Cigliana Giovanni, Gulli Francesca, Napodano Cecilia, Pocino Krizia, De Santis Elena, Colacicco Luigi, Cordone Iole, Conti Laura, Basile Umberto
Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Feb;32(2). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22243. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Serum free light chains detection assays are consistently meeting greater interest for the diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal gammopathies and plasma cell dyscrasias. Nowadays, there are neither standardized methods nor reference material for the determination of free light chains; for this reason, it is important to compare two different assays used in clinical laboratory.
We evaluated 300 serum samples from patients with B-cell disorders and compared the analytical performances of both assay. Each test was assayed on both testing platforms (Siemens Dade Behring BN II Nephelometer and SPAPLUS by The Binding Site). κ/λ ratios were determined and compared. Results were analyzed by Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman plots to evaluate comparability of the two techniques and to determine bias.
The reproducibility of both assays is acceptable, reaching minimum and desirable analytical goals derived from biological variability. However, values are not interchangeable between systems. This study shows that the two systems do not allow results to be transferred from one method to the other even if they display good agreement.
Our study highlights the importance of elaborating an international standard for free light chains quantification in order to offer homogeneous results as well as guarantee harmonization of values among laboratories. Moreover, the assays should be validated in specific patient groups to determine that they are clinically fit for purpose.
血清游离轻链检测方法在单克隆丙种球蛋白病和浆细胞异常增生症的诊断及监测方面越来越受到关注。目前,游离轻链的测定既没有标准化方法,也没有参考物质;因此,比较临床实验室使用的两种不同检测方法很重要。
我们评估了300例B细胞疾病患者的血清样本,并比较了两种检测方法的分析性能。每种检测在两个检测平台(西门子达德拜耳BN II散射比浊仪和Binding Site公司的SPAPLUS)上进行。测定并比较κ/λ比值。通过Passing-Bablok法和Bland-Altman图分析结果,以评估两种技术的可比性并确定偏差。
两种检测方法的重现性均可接受,达到了源自生物学变异的最低和理想分析目标。然而,不同系统间的数值不可互换。本研究表明,即使两种系统显示出良好的一致性,也不能将结果从一种方法转换到另一种方法。
我们的研究强调了制定游离轻链定量国际标准的重要性,以便提供一致的结果,并保证各实验室间数值的一致性。此外,检测方法应在特定患者群体中进行验证,以确定其在临床上是否适用。