Staudt M, Diederich J M, Meisel C, Meisel A, Klehmet J
Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Neurol. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0860-z.
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is presented by a large heterogeneity of clinical phenotypes. Around 50% of patients suffer from typical CIDP and show better therapy response than atypical variants. The goal of our study was to search for cellular immunological differences in typical versus atypical CIDP in comparison to controls.
We evaluated 26 (9 typical, 17 atypical) patients with mainly active-unstable CIDP using clinical and immunological examinations (enzyme-linked immunospot assay ELISPOT, fluorescence-activated cell sorting FACS) in comparison to 28 healthy, age-matched controls (HC). Typical or atypical CIDP measurements were compared with HC using Kruskal-Wallis test.
Atypical CIDP patients showed increased frequencies of T cell subsets, especially CD4+ effector memory T cells (TEM) and CD4+ central memory T cells (TCM) as well as a tendency of higher T cell responses against the peripheral myelin antigens of PMP-22, P2, P0 and MBP peptides compared to typical CIDP. Searching for novel auto-antigens, we found that T cell responses against P0 180-199 as well as MBP 82-100 were significantly elevated in atypical CIDP patients vs. HC.
Our results indicate differences in underlying T cell responses between atypical and typical CIDP characterized by a higher peripheral myelin antigen-specific T cell responses as well as a specific altered CD4+ memory compartment in atypical CIDP. Larger multi-center studies study are warranted in order to characterize T cell auto-reactivity in atypical CIDP subgroups in order to establish immunological markers as a diagnostic tool.
慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP)具有高度异质性的临床表型。约50%的患者患有典型CIDP,且其治疗反应优于非典型变异型。我们研究的目的是探寻典型与非典型CIDP与对照组相比在细胞免疫学方面的差异。
我们对26例(9例典型,17例非典型)主要为活动期-不稳定期CIDP患者进行了临床和免疫学检查(酶联免疫斑点试验ELISPOT、荧光激活细胞分选FACS),并与28例年龄匹配的健康对照(HC)进行比较。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验将典型或非典型CIDP的测量结果与HC进行比较。
与典型CIDP相比,非典型CIDP患者的T细胞亚群频率增加,尤其是CD4+效应记忆T细胞(TEM)和CD4+中枢记忆T细胞(TCM),并且对周围神经髓鞘抗原PMP-22、P2、P0和MBP肽的T细胞反应有升高趋势。在寻找新的自身抗原时,我们发现非典型CIDP患者对P0 180-199以及MBP 82-100的T细胞反应相对于HC显著升高。
我们的结果表明,非典型和典型CIDP在潜在T细胞反应方面存在差异,其特征是非典型CIDP中周围神经髓鞘抗原特异性T细胞反应更高以及CD4+记忆区室发生特定改变。有必要开展更大规模的多中心研究,以明确非典型CIDP亚组中的T细胞自身反应性,从而建立免疫标志物作为诊断工具。