Garofalo Sara, Robbins Trevor W
Behavioral and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of CambridgeCambridge, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, University of CambridgeCambridge, UK.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Apr 12;11:63. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00063. eCollection 2017.
The present study investigates human aversive Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer (PIT) and possible influences of outcome devaluation and instrumental overtraining on this effect. PIT measures the extent to which a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (CS) can increase instrumental responses independently paired with the same (outcome-specific transfer) or a different (general transfer) reinforcer. Two measures of PIT were obtained: the percentage of instrumental responses and the vigor of such responses. Thirty-eight volunteers performed a standard PIT task sequence. Results showed a double dissociation between outcome-specific and general transfer: the first selectively expressed in the amount of responses, the second in the vigor measure solely. Furthermore, outcome-specific transfer was enhanced by overtraining, but not affected by devaluation. General transfer, on the other hand, was affected by neither overtraining, nor devaluation. A positive correlation between general transfer and sensitivity to punishments was found. Findings are discussed in terms of hypothetically different underlying neurobehavioral mechanisms and their relations to habits and goal-directed behavior.
本研究调查了人类厌恶条件性刺激到工具性反应的转换(PIT),以及结果贬值和工具性过度训练对这种效应可能产生的影响。PIT衡量的是巴甫洛夫条件性刺激(CS)能够在多大程度上独立地增加与相同(特定结果转换)或不同(一般转换)强化物配对的工具性反应。获得了两种PIT测量指标:工具性反应的百分比和此类反应的强度。38名志愿者执行了标准的PIT任务序列。结果显示特定结果转换和一般转换之间存在双重分离:前者选择性地体现在反应数量上,后者仅体现在强度测量上。此外,特定结果转换通过过度训练得到增强,但不受贬值影响。另一方面,一般转换既不受过度训练影响,也不受贬值影响。发现一般转换与惩罚敏感性之间存在正相关。根据假设的不同潜在神经行为机制及其与习惯和目标导向行为的关系对研究结果进行了讨论。