Scarpina Federica, Tagini Sofia
"Rita Levi Montalcini" Department of Neuroscience, University of TurinTurin, Italy.
IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Ospedale San GiuseppePiancavallo, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557. eCollection 2017.
The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) is a neuropsychological test extensively used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute, well-known as the Stroop Effect. The aim of the present work is to verify the theoretical adequacy of the various scoring methods used to measure the Stroop effect. We present a systematic review of studies that have provided normative data for the SCWT. We referred to both electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar) and citations. Our findings show that while several scoring methods have been reported in literature, none of the reviewed methods enables us to fully assess the Stroop effect. Furthermore, we discuss several normative scoring methods from the Italian panorama as reported in literature. We claim for an alternative scoring method which takes into consideration both speed and accuracy of the response. Finally, we underline the importance of assessing the performance in all Stroop Test conditions (word reading, color naming, named color-word).
斯特鲁普颜色与文字测验（SCWT）是一种广泛应用的神经心理学测验，用于评估抑制认知干扰的能力。当对特定刺激特征的处理妨碍了对第二个刺激属性的同时处理时，就会出现这种认知干扰，即著名的斯特鲁普效应。本研究的目的是验证用于测量斯特鲁普效应的各种计分方法在理论上的适用性。我们对提供了SCWT常模数据的研究进行了系统综述。我们检索了电子数据库（即PubMed、Scopus、谷歌学术）以及参考文献。我们的研究结果表明，虽然文献中报道了几种计分方法，但所审查的方法均无法使我们全面评估斯特鲁普效应。此外，我们还讨论了文献中报道的来自意大利的几种常模计分方法。我们主张采用一种同时考虑反应速度和准确性的替代计分方法。最后，我们强调了评估所有斯特鲁普测验条件（文字阅读、颜色命名、颜色-文字命名）下表现的重要性。
