Suppr超能文献

视觉-听觉颜色词斯特鲁普不对称性及其时间进程。

The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.

作者信息

Roelofs Ardi

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1325-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03193365.

Abstract

Four experiments examined crossmodal versions of the Stroop task in order (1) to look for Stroop asymmetries in color naming, spoken-word naming, and written-word naming and to evaluate the time course of these asymmetries, and (2) to compare these findings to current models of the Stroop effect. Participants named color patches while ignoring spoken color words presented with an onset varying from 300 msec before to 300 msec after the onset of the color (Experiment 1), or they named the spoken words and ignored the colors (Experiment 2). A secondary visual detection task assured that the participants looked at the colors in both tasks. Spoken color words yielded Stroop effects in color naming, but colors did not yield an effect in spoken-word naming at any stimulus onset asynchrony. This asymmetry in effects was obtained with equivalent color- and spoken-word-naming latencies. Written color words yielded a Stroop effect in naming spoken words (Experiment 3), and spoken color words yielded an effect in naming written words (Experiment 4). These results were interpreted as most consistent with an architectural account of the color-word Stroop asymmetry, in contrast with discriminability and pathway strength accounts.

摘要

四项实验对斯特鲁普任务的跨通道版本进行了研究,目的如下:(1)探寻颜色命名、口语单词命名和书面单词命名中的斯特鲁普不对称现象,并评估这些不对称现象的时间进程;(2)将这些研究结果与当前的斯特鲁普效应模型进行比较。参与者在忽略与颜色呈现起始时间相差从提前300毫秒到延迟300毫秒的口语颜色词的同时,对颜色块进行命名(实验1),或者他们对口语单词进行命名并忽略颜色(实验2)。一项辅助视觉检测任务确保参与者在两项任务中都注视颜色。口语颜色词在颜色命名中产生了斯特鲁普效应,但在任何刺激起始异步条件下,颜色在口语单词命名中都未产生效应。这种效应的不对称在颜色命名潜伏期和口语单词命名潜伏期相当的情况下出现。书面颜色词在口语单词命名中产生了斯特鲁普效应(实验3),口语颜色词在书面单词命名中产生了效应(实验4)。与辨别力和通路强度解释相比,这些结果被解释为与颜色-单词斯特鲁普不对称的结构解释最为一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验