• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的减重修复手术——一项单中心长期回顾性研究

Revisional bariatric surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - a single-center, long-term retrospective study.

作者信息

Kowalewski Piotr K, Olszewski Robert, Kwiatkowski Andrzej P, Paśnik Krzysztof

机构信息

Department of General, Oncological, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Cardiology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017;12(1):32-36. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.66671. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2017.66671
PMID:28446930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5397551/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) used to be one of the most popular bariatric procedures.

AIM

To present our institution's experience with LAGB, its complications, causes of failure and revisional bariatric procedures, in a long-term follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of patients who underwent pars flaccida LAGB from 2003 to 2006 were gathered. We selected data on patients with a history of additional bariatric procedures. Their initial demographic data, body mass index and causes of revision were gathered. We analyzed length of stay and early perioperative complications.

RESULTS

60% of patients (n = 57) who underwent LAGB in our institution between 2003 and 2006 had their band removed (out of 107, 11% lost to follow-up). Median time to revisional surgery was 50 months. The main reasons for removal were: weight regain (n = 23; 40%), band slippage (n = 14; 25%), and pouch dilatation (n = 9; 16%). Thirty (53%) patients required additional bariatric surgery, 10 (33%) of which were simultaneous with band removal. The most popular procedures were: laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) (n = 15; 50%), open gastric bypass (n = 8; 27%), and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) - (n = 3; 10%). Mean length of stay (LOS) was 5.4 ±2.0. One (3%) perioperative complication was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that LAGB is not an effective bariatric procedure in long-term follow-up due to the high rate of complications causing band removal and the high rate of obesity recurrence. Revisional bariatric surgery after failed LAGB may be performed in a one-stage approach with band removal.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)曾是最流行的减肥手术之一。

目的

在长期随访中展示我们机构开展LAGB的经验、其并发症、失败原因及减肥修正手术。

材料与方法

收集2003年至2006年接受松弛部LAGB手术患者的记录。我们选取了有其他减肥手术史患者的数据。收集他们的初始人口统计学数据、体重指数及修正原因。分析住院时间和早期围手术期并发症。

结果

2003年至2006年在我们机构接受LAGB手术的患者中,60%(n = 57)的束带被移除(107例中,11%失访)。修正手术的中位时间为50个月。移除束带的主要原因是:体重反弹(n = 23;40%)、束带滑脱(n = 14;25%)和胃囊扩张(n = 9;16%)。30例(53%)患者需要额外的减肥手术,其中10例(33%)在移除束带的同时进行。最常用的手术是:腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)(n = 15;50%)、开放式胃旁路术(n = 8;27%)和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)(n = 3;10%)。平均住院时间(LOS)为5.4±2.0天。报告了1例(3%)围手术期并发症。

结论

结果表明,由于导致束带移除的并发症发生率高以及肥胖复发率高,LAGB在长期随访中不是一种有效的减肥手术。LAGB失败后的减肥修正手术可在移除束带的一期手术中进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b49/5397551/35b310885216/WIITM-12-29668-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b49/5397551/9e731867ea48/WIITM-12-29668-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b49/5397551/0df6e192dc77/WIITM-12-29668-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b49/5397551/35b310885216/WIITM-12-29668-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b49/5397551/9e731867ea48/WIITM-12-29668-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b49/5397551/0df6e192dc77/WIITM-12-29668-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b49/5397551/35b310885216/WIITM-12-29668-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Revisional bariatric surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - a single-center, long-term retrospective study.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的减重修复手术——一项单中心长期回顾性研究
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017;12(1):32-36. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.66671. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
2
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal and outcome of subsequent revisional bariatric procedures: A retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients.腹腔镜可调节胃束带移除术及后续减重手术修正的结果:对214例连续患者的回顾性研究
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.068. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Two-step conversion surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Comparison between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric sleeve.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的两步转换手术。腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与腹腔镜胃袖状切除术的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1085-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
4
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedures after Adjustable Gastric Band: 5-Year Outcomes.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术作为可调节胃束带术后修正手术的5年结果
Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1430-1437. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2502-8.
5
Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature.减重手术后的长期结果:可调胃束带术 15 年随访结果及减重手术文献的系统评价
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):87-94. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b6c02.
6
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Revisions in Singapore: a 10-Year Experience.新加坡腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的翻修:十年经验
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):1069-74. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1852-y.
7
Procedure-related morbidity in bariatric surgery: a retrospective short- and mid-term follow-up of a single institution of the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence.减重手术相关发病率:美国外科医师学会减重手术卓越中心单机构的回顾性短期和中期随访。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Oct;217(4):614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
8
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure for failed laparoscopic gastric banding with a "2-step approach": a multicenter study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为一种采用“两步法”对失败的腹腔镜胃束带术进行的修正手术:一项多中心研究
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):626-31. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
9
Short-Term Outcomes of Conversion of Failed Gastric Banding to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy or Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Meta-Analysis.胃束带术失败后转换为腹腔镜袖状胃切除术或 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的短期疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2019 Feb;29(2):420-425. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3538-8.
10
What happens after gastric band removal without additional bariatric surgery?在不进行额外减肥手术的情况下,拆除胃束带后会发生什么?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1092-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisional bariatric surgery after adjustable gastric band: a multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS).可调胃束带减肥术后再次手术:多中心波兰减肥手术研究(PROSS)。
BMC Surg. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02002-w.
2
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a Revisional Procedure After Failed Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding.胃旁路吻合术作为腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的翻修术。
Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3296-3300. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04569-2.
3
Is it possible to improve long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with appropriate patient selection?

本文引用的文献

1
Present status of bariatric surgery in Poland.波兰减重手术的现状。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016;11(1):22-25. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.58742. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
2
Life with a Gastric Band. Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding-a Retrospective Study.胃束带的生活。腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的长期结果——一项回顾性研究。
Obes Surg. 2017 May;27(5):1250-1253. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2435-2.
3
5-year outcomes of 1-stage gastric band removal and sleeve gastrectomy.一期胃束带移除术和袖状胃切除术的5年结果
通过适当的患者选择,有可能改善腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的长期效果吗?
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Mar;15(1):166-170. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.86773. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Setting realistic expectations for weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后的体重减轻设定现实的期望。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Sep;14(3):415-419. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.81661. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
5
Present trends in bariatric surgery in Poland.波兰减肥手术的当前趋势。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Jan;14(1):86-89. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.77707. Epub 2018 Aug 19.
6
A prospective study comparing 5-year results between superobese and non-superobese patients after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.一项比较腹腔镜可调节胃束带术后超肥胖患者与非超肥胖患者5年结果的前瞻性研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Jan;14(1):79-85. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.77269. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
7
Revisional Gastric Bypass Is Inferior to Primary Gastric Bypass in Terms of Short- and Long-term Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.再次胃旁路手术在短期和长期结果方面劣于初次胃旁路手术-系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2018 Jul;28(7):2083-2091. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3300-2.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Dec;12(10):1769-1776. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 May 20.
4
Natural History of Adjustable Gastric Banding: Lifespan and Revisional Rate: A Nationwide Study on Administrative Data on 53,000 Patients.可调节胃束带术的自然史:寿命与翻修率:一项基于53000例患者行政数据的全国性研究
Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):439-445. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001879.
5
Fast-Track in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Feasibility and Cost Analysis Through a Matched-Cohort Study in a Single Centre.减重与代谢手术的快速通道:通过单中心配对队列研究进行可行性和成本分析
Obes Surg. 2016 Aug;26(8):1970-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2255-4.
6
Comparison of safety between 1-stage and 2-stage surgery: from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.一期手术与二期手术安全性的比较:从腹腔镜可调节胃束带术到腹腔镜袖状胃切除术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jun;12(5):976-983. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
7
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: efficacy and consequences over a 13-year period.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术:13年期间的疗效及影响
Am J Surg. 2016 Jul;212(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.021. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
8
Lap band outcomes from 19,221 patients across centers and over a decade within the state of New York.纽约州内各中心在十年多时间里对19221名患者进行胃束带手术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1725-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4402-8. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
9
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013.《2013年全球减肥手术》
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1822-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z.
10
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.