• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经右胸入路与经左胸入路治疗中下段食管鳞癌的前瞻性随机开放标签临床试验:3 年生存分析。

Extended Right Thoracic Approach Compared With Limited Left Thoracic Approach for Patients With Middle and Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Three-year Survival of a Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Trial.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):826-832. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280
PMID:28448385
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether survival is improved by using the right thoracic approach (extended lymphadenectomy) compared with the left thoracic approach (limited lymphadenectomy) for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical technique for esophageal cancer remains unclear.

METHODS

Between May 2010 and July 2012, 300 patients with middle and lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma were randomized to receive esophagectomy through either the right or left thoracic approach. Of these, 286 patients with squamous cell carcinoma determined by postoperative pathology were included in this analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the right (n = 146) and left thoracic groups (n = 140).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 55.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 53.1-58.6]. The 3-year DFS rates were 62% and 52% in the right and left thoracic arms, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.709; 95% CI, 0.506-0.995; P = 0.047, log-rank test]. The 3-year OS rates were 74% and 60%, respectively (HR, 0.663; 95% CI, 0.457-0.961; P = 0.029). Subgroup analyses revealed longer DFS in the right thoracic arm (vs left thoracic arm) in patients with lymph node involvement (HR, 0.632; 95% CI, 0.412-0.969, P = 0.034), but not in patients without lymph node involvement (HR, 0.757; 95% CI, 0.434-1.320, P = 0.325), and in patients with R1-2 resection margins (HR, 0.495; 95% CI, 0.290-0.848, P = 0.009), but not R0 margins (HR, 0.944; 95% CI, 0.603-1.477, P = 0.801).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the left thoracic approach, the right thoracic approach associated with increased DFS and OS in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, particularly in those with lymph node involvement and/or R1-2 resection margins.

摘要

目的

研究对于食管癌,右胸入路(扩大淋巴结清扫术)相较于左胸入路(局限性淋巴结清扫术)是否能提高生存率。

背景

食管癌的最佳手术技术仍不明确。

方法

2010 年 5 月至 2012 年 7 月,300 例中下段食管鳞癌患者被随机分为右胸或左胸入路行食管癌切除术。术后病理证实为鳞癌的 286 例患者被纳入本分析。比较右胸组(n=146)和左胸组(n=140)的无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)。

结果

中位随访时间为 55.9 个月(95%置信区间[CI]:53.1-58.6)。右胸组和左胸组的 3 年 DFS 率分别为 62%和 52%(风险比[HR]0.709;95%CI:0.506-0.995;P=0.047,对数秩检验)。3 年 OS 率分别为 74%和 60%(HR,0.663;95%CI:0.457-0.961;P=0.029)。亚组分析显示,淋巴结受累患者右胸组(vs 左胸组)DFS 更长(HR,0.632;95%CI:0.412-0.969,P=0.034),而无淋巴结受累患者(HR,0.757;95%CI:0.434-1.320,P=0.325)和 R1-2 切缘(HR,0.495;95%CI:0.290-0.848,P=0.009)患者无差异,而 R0 切缘患者(HR,0.944;95%CI:0.603-1.477,P=0.801)DFS 无差异。

结论

与左胸入路相比,右胸入路增加了食管鳞癌患者的 DFS 和 OS,尤其是淋巴结受累和/或 R1-2 切缘患者。

相似文献

1
Extended Right Thoracic Approach Compared With Limited Left Thoracic Approach for Patients With Middle and Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Three-year Survival of a Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Trial.经右胸入路与经左胸入路治疗中下段食管鳞癌的前瞻性随机开放标签临床试验:3 年生存分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):826-832. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280.
2
Prophylactic thoracic duct ligation is associated with poor prognosis and regional lymph node relapse in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.预防性胸导管结扎与食管鳞癌预后不良和区域淋巴结复发相关。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;122(2):336-343. doi: 10.1002/jso.25948. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
[Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌两野与三野淋巴结清扫术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):990-994.
4
Survival risk prediction model for patients with pT NM esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for therapeutic purposes.pT NM期食管鳞状细胞癌患者行R0食管切除术及两野淋巴结清扫术治疗后的生存风险预测模型
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 1;16(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01503-0.
5
Surgical quality determines the long-term survival superiority of right over left thoracic esophagectomy for localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a real-world multicenter study.外科质量决定了左胸与右胸食管切除术治疗局限性食管鳞癌患者的长期生存优势:一项真实世界多中心研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):675-683. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000897.
6
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between 3-field and modern 2-field lymph node dissections for thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.胸段食管鳞状细胞癌三野与现代两野淋巴结清扫术的短期和长期疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;29(3):434-441. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz108.
7
[Efficacy of surgical resection of left and right transthoracic approaches for middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[左右经胸入路手术切除治疗胸段中段食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效]
Ai Zheng. 2009 Dec;28(12):1260-4. doi: 10.5732/cjc.008.10660.
8
Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection.在根治性食管切除术和三野淋巴结清扫术后,颈淋巴结转移在胸段食管鳞状细胞癌中被归类为区域淋巴结分期。
BMC Surg. 2014 Dec 19;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-110.
9
[Lymphatic metastasis intensity of and lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的淋巴转移强度及淋巴结清扫术]
Ai Zheng. 2006 May;25(5):604-8.
10
Metastatic patterns of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without neoadjuvant therapy.未经新辅助治疗的胸段食管鳞癌的隆突下、右和左喉返神经淋巴结转移模式。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 7;150(8):387. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05911-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The optimal number of lymph node dissections in three-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large retrospective study.食管鳞状细胞癌三野淋巴结清扫术中淋巴结清扫的最佳数量:一项大型回顾性研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Apr 5;410(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03686-9.
2
Right versus left thoracic approach esophagectomy for patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.新辅助免疫化疗患者行右胸与左胸入路食管切除术的比较
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2456691. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2456691. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
3
Prognostic prediction model for patients with pathological T1N0 stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergone esophagectomy.
接受食管切除术的病理T1N0期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的预后预测模型
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):5274-5284. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-935. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
Clinical value of station 4R node dissection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞癌 4R 区淋巴结清扫的临床价值。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec 18;21(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03280-7.
5
Surgical quality determines the long-term survival superiority of right over left thoracic esophagectomy for localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a real-world multicenter study.外科质量决定了左胸与右胸食管切除术治疗局限性食管鳞癌患者的长期生存优势:一项真实世界多中心研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):675-683. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000897.
6
Pattern of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助化疗免疫治疗后的肿瘤退缩模式
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):5517-5524. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-882. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
7
Precise pattern of lymphatic spread of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results of 1074 patients with N1 disease.食管鳞状细胞癌的精确淋巴转移模式:1074例N1期疾病患者的研究结果
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(17):15819-15825. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05359-w. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
8
A novel anastomotic vacuum-assisted closure system for cervical anastomotic fistula after three-incisional esophagectomy.一种用于三切口食管切除术后颈段吻合口瘘的新型吻合口负压封闭系统。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023 Jun 7;11:goad023. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goad023. eCollection 2023.
9
Left compared with right thoracic approach thoracotomy in esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.左胸入路与右胸入路开胸手术治疗食管癌的回顾性队列研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(11):8289-8296. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04765-4. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
10
Comparison of thoracoabdominal versus abdominal-transhiatal surgical approaches in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction: Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.胸腹部联合手术与经腹食管裂孔手术治疗食管胃交界部Siewert II型腺癌的比较:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验方案
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 30;13:1091615. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1091615. eCollection 2023.