• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[左右经胸入路手术切除治疗胸段中段食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效]

[Efficacy of surgical resection of left and right transthoracic approaches for middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].

作者信息

Luo Kong-Jia, Fu Jian-Hua, Hu Yi, Rong Tie-Hua, Lin Peng, Wang Xin, Yang Hong, Zheng Bin, Li Yong-Feng

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060,P. R. China.

出版信息

Ai Zheng. 2009 Dec;28(12):1260-4. doi: 10.5732/cjc.008.10660.

DOI:10.5732/cjc.008.10660
PMID:19958619
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

For squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus, surgical resection of left or right transthoracic approach has its advantages and disadvantages, respectively. This study was to compare the outcomes between the two approaches.

METHODS

A total of 482 consecutive patients with middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) underwent transthoracic esophagectomy between January 1999 and June 2005. These patients were divided into left transthoracic approach group (n=350) and right transthoracic approach group (n=132). Surgical resection rate, postoperative complications, lymphadenectomy, recurrence pattern, disease-free survival, and overall survival of the two groups were compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

The surgical resection rate was 92.0% in left approach group and 92.4% in right approach group (P=0.878). The incidence of postoperative complications was higher in right approach group than in left approach group (57.6% vs. 35.4%, P<0.001). The average number of lymph nodes resected was 11.8+/-6.6 in left approach group and 16.3+/-8.0 in right approach group (P<0.001). Lymphatic recurrence rate was lower in right approach group than in left approach group (51.1% vs. 69.6%,P=0.028), especially occurring to mediastinal lymph nodes (15.6% vs. 38.4%,P=0.005). Three-year disease-free survival was higher in right approach group than in left approach group(22.92+/-0.74 vs. 25.09+/-1.22, P=0.039).

CONCLUSION

Although left transthoracic resection reduced the incidence of postoperative complications, esophagectomy of right transthoracic approach was more effective in survival improvement.

摘要

背景与目的

对于胸段中段食管癌,经左胸或经右胸手术切除各有优缺点。本研究旨在比较两种手术方式的治疗效果。

方法

1999年1月至2005年6月期间,共有482例连续性胸段中段食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者接受了经胸段食管切除术。这些患者被分为经左胸手术组(n = 350)和经右胸手术组(n = 132)。回顾性比较两组患者手术切除率、术后并发症、淋巴结清扫情况、复发模式、无病生存率和总生存率等指标。

结果

经左胸手术组手术切除率为92.0%,经右胸手术组为92.4%(P = 0.878);经右胸手术组术后并发症发生率高于经左胸手术组(57.6% 对35.4%,P <0.001);经左胸手术组平均切除淋巴结数为11.8 ± 6.6枚,经右胸手术组为16.3 ±8.0枚(P <0.001);经右胸手术组淋巴转移复发率低于经左胸手术组(51.1% 对69.6%;P =0.028),尤其在纵隔淋巴结转移方面(15.6% 对38.4%;P =0.005);经右胸手术组三年无病生存率高于经左胸手术组(22.92 ± 0.74对25.09 ± 1.22;P =0.039)。

结论

虽然经左胸手术可降低术后并发症发生率,但经右胸手术切除食管对提高生存率更有效。

相似文献

1
[Efficacy of surgical resection of left and right transthoracic approaches for middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[左右经胸入路手术切除治疗胸段中段食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效]
Ai Zheng. 2009 Dec;28(12):1260-4. doi: 10.5732/cjc.008.10660.
2
[Comparison of the results of lymph node dissection via left versus right thoracotomy].[经左胸与右胸开胸进行淋巴结清扫的结果比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;34(4):296-300. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.04.013.
3
Efficacy comparison of transcervical video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy combined with left transthoracic esophagectomy versus right transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer treatment.经颈纵隔镜辅助淋巴结清扫术联合左开胸食管癌切除术与右开胸食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的疗效比较。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Feb 9;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1268-3.
4
[Regulations and lymphadenectomy strategy of mediastinal and upper abdominal lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma].[胸段食管癌纵隔及上腹部淋巴结转移的相关规定及淋巴结清扫策略]
Ai Zheng. 2007 Sep;26(9):1020-4.
5
[Patterns of recurrence in patients with stage pT3N0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after two-field esophagectomy].[两野淋巴结清扫食管切除术治疗胸段pT3N0M0期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的复发模式]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;38(1):48-54. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2016.01.010.
6
Right versus left transthoracic approach for lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.经胸右路与左路治疗淋巴结阴性食管鳞状细胞癌的比较
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Sep 18;10:123. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0328-4.
7
Extended Right Thoracic Approach Compared With Limited Left Thoracic Approach for Patients With Middle and Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Three-year Survival of a Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Trial.经右胸入路与经左胸入路治疗中下段食管鳞癌的前瞻性随机开放标签临床试验:3 年生存分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):826-832. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280.
8
[Lymphatic metastasis intensity of and lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的淋巴转移强度及淋巴结清扫术]
Ai Zheng. 2006 May;25(5):604-8.
9
Clinical outcome of transthoracic esophagectomy with thoracic duct resection: Number of dissected lymph node and distribution of lymph node metastasis around the thoracic duct.经胸食管切除术联合胸导管切除术的临床结果:清扫淋巴结数量及胸导管周围淋巴结转移分布情况
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(24):e3839. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003839.
10
[Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with two-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus].[经腹-右胸两切口食管癌根治术联合二野淋巴结清扫治疗胸段下段食管鳞癌]
Ai Zheng. 2007 Mar;26(3):307-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of esophagectomy via left thoracic approach versus via right thoracic approach for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (NST1501).左胸入路与右胸入路食管癌切除术治疗胸段中下段食管癌的疗效与安全性:一项多中心随机临床试验(NST1501)
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Aug;10(16):904. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3810.
2
Society for Translational Medicine Expert consensus on the selection of surgical approaches in the management of thoracic esophageal carcinoma.转化医学学会关于胸段食管癌治疗中手术入路选择的专家共识
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jan;11(1):319-328. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.07.
3
Long-term survival of the middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer patients after surgical treatment through left or right thoracic approach.
经左胸或右胸入路手术治疗的胸段中下段食管癌患者的长期生存情况。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 May;10(5):2648-2655. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.45.
4
Minimally invasive esophagectomy via Sweet approach in combination with cervical mediastinoscopy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case series.经Sweet入路微创食管切除术联合颈部纵隔镜检查治疗食管鳞状细胞癌:病例系列
Int J Surg Oncol (N Y). 2017 Dec;2(11):e45. doi: 10.1097/IJ9.0000000000000045. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
5
Prognostic Nomogram for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Radical Esophagectomy.根治性食管切除术后胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的预后列线图
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0124437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124437. eCollection 2015.