Micha Renata, Shulkin Masha L, Peñalvo Jose L, Khatibzadeh Shahab, Singh Gitanjali M, Rao Mayuree, Fahimi Saman, Powles John, Mozaffarian Dariush
Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 27;12(4):e0175149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175149. eCollection 2017.
Dietary habits are major contributors to coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. However, comprehensive evaluation of etiologic effects of dietary factors on cardiometabolic outcomes, their quantitative effects, and corresponding optimal intakes are not well-established.
To systematically review the evidence for effects of dietary factors on cardiometabolic diseases, including comprehensively assess evidence for causality; estimate magnitudes of etiologic effects; evaluate heterogeneity and potential for bias in these etiologic effects; and determine optimal population intake levels.
We utilized Bradford-Hill criteria to assess probable or convincing evidence for causal effects of multiple diet-cardiometabolic disease relationships. Etiologic effects were quantified from published or de novo meta-analyses of prospective studies or randomized clinical trials, incorporating standardized units, dose-response estimates, and heterogeneity by age and other characteristics. Potential for bias was assessed in validity analyses. Optimal intakes were determined by levels associated with lowest disease risk.
We identified 10 foods and 7 nutrients with evidence for causal cardiometabolic effects, including protective effects of fruits, vegetables, beans/legumes, nuts/seeds, whole grains, fish, yogurt, fiber, seafood omega-3s, polyunsaturated fats, and potassium; and harms of unprocessed red meats, processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages, glycemic load, trans-fats, and sodium. Proportional etiologic effects declined with age, but did not generally vary by sex. Established optimal population intakes were generally consistent with observed national intakes and major dietary guidelines. In validity analyses, the identified effects of individual dietary components were similar to quantified effects of dietary patterns on cardiovascular risk factors and hard endpoints.
These novel findings provide a comprehensive summary of causal evidence, quantitative etiologic effects, heterogeneity, and optimal intakes of major dietary factors for cardiometabolic diseases, informing disease impact estimation and policy planning and priorities.
饮食习惯是冠心病、中风和糖尿病的主要促成因素。然而,饮食因素对心脏代谢结局的病因学影响、其定量效应以及相应的最佳摄入量尚未得到充分确立。
系统回顾饮食因素对心脏代谢疾病影响的证据,包括全面评估因果关系的证据;估计病因学效应的大小;评估这些病因学效应的异质性和偏倚可能性;并确定最佳人群摄入量水平。
我们利用布拉德福德·希尔标准来评估多种饮食与心脏代谢疾病关系的因果效应的可能或令人信服的证据。病因学效应通过对前瞻性研究或随机临床试验的已发表或新的荟萃分析进行量化,纳入标准化单位、剂量反应估计以及按年龄和其他特征的异质性。在有效性分析中评估偏倚可能性。最佳摄入量通过与最低疾病风险相关的水平来确定。
我们确定了10种食物和7种营养素具有因果性心脏代谢效应的证据,包括水果、蔬菜、豆类/豆科植物、坚果/种子、全谷物、鱼类、酸奶、纤维、海鲜ω-3脂肪酸、多不饱和脂肪和钾的保护作用;以及未加工红肉、加工肉类、含糖饮料、血糖负荷、反式脂肪和钠的危害。病因学效应比例随年龄下降,但一般不因性别而异。既定的最佳人群摄入量通常与观察到的全国摄入量和主要饮食指南一致。在有效性分析中,确定的个体饮食成分的效应与饮食模式对心血管危险因素和硬性终点的量化效应相似。
这些新发现提供了关于心脏代谢疾病主要饮食因素的因果证据、定量病因学效应、异质性和最佳摄入量的全面总结,为疾病影响估计以及政策规划和重点提供了信息。