Suppr超能文献

超越营养素:如何评估炎症性肠病患者的饮食质量——一篇叙述性综述

Looking Beyond Nutrients, How to Assess Diet Quality in an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Population-A Narrative Review.

作者信息

Portmann Laura J, Fitzpatrick Jessica A, Halmos Emma P, Bryant Robert V, Day Alice S

机构信息

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Service, Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Group, The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2025 Jul 17;17(14):2343. doi: 10.3390/nu17142343.

Abstract

: Dietary assessment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is moving away from individual food and nutrient analyses and towards dietary patterns (e.g., Mediterranean diet, Western diet) and diet quality assessment that are increasingly implicated in IBD onset and course. However, an IBD-specific diet quality index (DQI) does not exist. This review aimed to identify current DQIs and assess their suitability for an IBD population. : MEDLINE and EmCare databases were systematically searched for a-priori, food-based DQI reflecting current dietary guidelines and/or nutrition science. Data extracted were adapted from optimal DQI criteria, including quality measures of adequacy, moderation, variety and balance and DQI evaluation. : Twenty-four DQI were identified. No DQI included all optimal DQI criteria. The Dietary Guideline Index 2013 (DGI-2013) most closely met the criteria, followed by the Dutch Healthy Diet Index-2015 (DHD-Index 2015), Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) and Healthy Eating Index for Australian Adults-2013 (HEIFA-2013). Most DQI assessed adequacy (22/24, 92%) and moderation (21/24, 88%), half assessed balance (12/24) while few assessed variety (8/24, 33%). Application of other optimal DQI criteria varied. Food frequency questionnaire (13/24) and 24 h diet recall (12/24) were the most common dietary assessment methods used. Most DQI (17/24, 71%) were validated; however, not for an IBD population. Few were evaluated for reliability (6/24) or reproducibility (1/24). : No DQI meets all optimal criteria for an IBD-specific DQI. The DGI-2013 met the most criteria, followed by the DHD Index-2015, PHDI and HEIFA-2013 and may be most appropriate for an IBD population. An IBD-specific DQI is lacking and needed.

摘要

炎症性肠病(IBD)的饮食评估正从个体食物和营养分析转向饮食模式(如地中海饮食、西方饮食)以及饮食质量评估,而这些因素与IBD的发病和病程的关联日益增加。然而,目前尚不存在针对IBD的饮食质量指数(DQI)。本综述旨在识别当前的DQI,并评估其对IBD人群的适用性。:系统检索MEDLINE和EmCare数据库,以查找基于食物的先验DQI,这些DQI反映了当前的饮食指南和/或营养科学。提取的数据改编自最佳DQI标准,包括充足性、适度性、多样性和平衡性的质量指标以及DQI评估。:共识别出24种DQI。没有一种DQI包含所有最佳DQI标准。2013年饮食指南指数(DGI - 2013)最接近这些标准,其次是2015年荷兰健康饮食指数(DHD - Index 2015)、行星健康饮食指数(PHDI)和2013年澳大利亚成年人健康饮食指数(HEIFA - 2013)。大多数DQI评估了充足性(22/24,92%)和适度性(21/24,88%),一半评估了平衡性(12/24),而很少评估多样性(8/24,33%)。其他最佳DQI标准的应用情况各不相同。食物频率问卷(13/24)和24小时饮食回顾(12/24)是最常用的饮食评估方法。大多数DQI(17/24,71%)经过了验证;然而,并非针对IBD人群。很少有DQI评估可靠性(6/24)或可重复性(1/24)。:没有一种DQI符合针对IBD的特定DQI的所有最佳标准。DGI - 2013符合的标准最多,其次是DHD指数 - 2015、PHDI和HEIFA - 2013,可能最适合IBD人群。目前缺乏且需要针对IBD的特定DQI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验