Schmid Christian Philipp Rudolf
CSS Institute for Empirical Health Economics, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Department of Economics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):1807-1812. doi: 10.1002/hec.3504. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
Accurate information on individuals' health service use is important for evaluating health policies and analyzing health care demand. Although register data are considered to be more reliable than survey data, little is known about the extent and effect of censoring of the expenditure distribution in register data. We exploit a recent change in the health provider remuneration system in several Swiss cantons to empirically investigate whether censoring occurs when individuals do not have to disclose their health service use below their deductible level. Applying a difference-in-differences approach, we find that between CHF 6.70 (1.7%) to CHF 9.64 (2.4%) of all health service use paid out-of-pocket are not observed (per capita per year). This effect seems to be driven by high-deductible plans where observed out-of-pocket expenditures declined by CHF 30.34 (7.6%) after the change. Although statistically significant, these effects are almost negligible in economic terms. We therefore concluded that, if anything, censoring is a very limited issue in Swiss health insurance claims data.
准确的个人医疗服务使用信息对于评估卫生政策和分析医疗保健需求非常重要。尽管登记数据被认为比调查数据更可靠,但对于登记数据中支出分布的审查程度和影响却知之甚少。我们利用瑞士几个州近期医疗服务提供者薪酬体系的变化,实证研究当个人无需披露低于免赔额水平的医疗服务使用情况时,是否会发生审查。应用双重差分法,我们发现每年人均自付的所有医疗服务使用费用中有6.70瑞士法郎(1.7%)至9.64瑞士法郎(2.4%)未被观察到。这种影响似乎是由高免赔额计划驱动的,在变革之后,观察到的自付支出下降了30.34瑞士法郎(7.6%)。尽管在统计上具有显著性,但从经济角度来看,这些影响几乎可以忽略不计。因此,我们得出结论,在瑞士医疗保险理赔数据中,审查即便存在,也是一个非常有限的问题。