Padegimas Eric M, Kreitz Tyler M, Zmistowski Benjamin M, Girden Alexander J, Hozack William J, Chen Antonia F
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sidney-Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2347-2352. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.032. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
The purpose of this study is to compare perioperative outcomes for total hip arthroplasty (THA) at an orthopedic specialty hospital (OSH) and a general hospital (GH).
A retrospective study of all primary THAs was performed at an OSH and GH in 2014. A cohort of GH patients was manually matched to the OSH by clinical and demographic variables blinded to outcome. These matched groups were then unblinded and compared by length of stay (LOS), 90-day readmissions, mortality, reoperations, and inpatient rehabilitation utilization.
The 329 THAs at the OSH were matched with 329 THAs at the GH. Average LOS for THA at the OSH was 1.10 ± 0.51 days compared with 1.27 ± 0.93 (P = .004) at the GH. There were 2 OSH readmissions vs 5 GH readmissions (P = .25). There were 3 OSH reoperations vs 4 GH reoperations (P = .70). There were no mortalities. Three OSH patients used inpatient rehabilitation vs 13 GH patients (P = .011). When GH outlier and rehabilitation patients were excluded, the difference in LOS was not significant (1.08 ± 0.47 vs 1.13 ± 0.55 days; t = 1.331; P = .184). Two OSH patients required transfer to a GH postoperatively (angina and gastrointestinal bleed).
This study found that perioperative outcomes for THA were equally good at the OSH and GH. Rehabilitation utilization was higher at the GH. The LOS at both facilities was lower than the national average of 2.9 days. When rehabilitation patients and outliers were excluded, there was no significant difference in LOS between the two.
本研究旨在比较骨科专科医院(OSH)和综合医院(GH)全髋关节置换术(THA)的围手术期结果。
对2014年在一家OSH和一家GH进行的所有初次THA手术进行回顾性研究。一组GH患者通过对结果不知情的临床和人口统计学变量与OSH患者进行人工匹配。然后对这些匹配组进行结果揭晓,并比较住院时间(LOS)、90天再入院率、死亡率、再次手术率和住院康复利用率。
OSH的329例THA手术与GH的329例THA手术相匹配。OSH的THA平均住院时间为1.10±0.51天,而GH为1.27±0.93天(P = 0.004)。OSH有2例再入院,GH有5例再入院(P = 0.25)。OSH有3例再次手术,GH有4例再次手术(P = 0.70)。无死亡病例。OSH有3例患者使用住院康复,GH有13例患者(P = 0.011)。排除GH的异常值和康复患者后,住院时间差异无统计学意义(1.08±0.47天 vs 1.13±0.55天;t = 1.331;P = 0.184)。2例OSH患者术后需要转至GH(心绞痛和胃肠道出血)。
本研究发现,OSH和GH的THA围手术期结果同样良好。GH的康复利用率更高。两家机构的住院时间均低于全国平均水平2.9天。排除康复患者和异常值后,两者的住院时间无显著差异。