• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Design and baseline data from a PCORI-funded randomized controlled trial of family-centered tailoring of diabetes self-management resources.一项由PCORI资助的关于以家庭为中心定制糖尿病自我管理资源的随机对照试验的设计与基线数据。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Jul;58:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
2
Impact of family-centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self-management resources.以家庭为中心的儿科糖尿病自我管理资源定制的影响。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Nov;20(7):1016-1024. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12899. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
4
5
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
6
Assessment of a Precision Medicine Analysis of a Behavioral Counseling Strategy to Improve Adherence to Diabetes Self-management Among Youth: A Post Hoc Analysis of the FLEX Trial.评估一项精准医学分析,即行为咨询策略对改善青少年糖尿病自我管理依从性的效果:FLEX 试验的事后分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e195137. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5137.
7
Improving empowerment, motivation, and medical adherence in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial of a patient-centered intervention.提高治疗不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的授权、动机和医疗依从性:一项以患者为中心的干预的随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Dec;102(12):2238-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
8
Motivational Interviewing and Self-Care in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study Protocol.动机性访谈联合自我护理在 1 型糖尿病患者中的应用:一项随机对照临床试验研究方案。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Dec 10;11:574312. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.574312. eCollection 2020.
9
A person-centered education for adolescents with type 1 diabetes-A randomized controlled trial.以患者为中心的教育在青少年 1 型糖尿病患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验
Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Nov;20(7):986-996. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12888. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
10
Development and validation of the self-management Barriers and Supports Evaluation for working-aged adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.1 型糖尿病患者自我管理障碍与支持评估量表的编制及信效度检验。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002583.

引用本文的文献

1
What Are the Various Comprehensive Treatment Models to Improve Self-Efficacy and Self-Management in Adolescents with Diabetes Mellitus? A Scoping Review.改善糖尿病青少年自我效能和自我管理的各种综合治疗模式有哪些?一项范围综述。
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Jul;52(7):1320-1333. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i7.13234.
2
Evaluating the Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in a School-Based Type 1 Diabetes Study.评估利益相关者参与一项基于学校的1型糖尿病研究的影响。
Diabetes Spectr. 2021 Nov;34(4):419-424. doi: 10.2337/ds21-0004. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
3
Pilot and feasibility studies for pragmatic trials have unique considerations and areas of uncertainty.实用临床试验的初步研究和可行性研究具有独特的考虑因素和不确定领域。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:102-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.029. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
4
Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.美国临床试验中使用真实世界数据的当代应用:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):144-154. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa224.
5
Impact of family-centered tailoring of pediatric diabetes self-management resources.以家庭为中心的儿科糖尿病自我管理资源定制的影响。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Nov;20(7):1016-1024. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12899. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
6
The Quality of Family Relationships, Diabetes Self-Care, and Health Outcomes in Older Adults.老年人的家庭关系质量、糖尿病自我管理与健康结局
Diabetes Spectr. 2019 May;32(2):132-138. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0039.
7
Developing "Aryan:" Diabetes Self-care Mobile Application.开发“Aryan”:糖尿病自我护理移动应用程序。
Int J Prev Med. 2019 May 6;10:59. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_344_17. eCollection 2019.
8
Review of Community-Engaged Research in Pediatric Diabetes.《儿科糖尿病中的社区参与式研究述评》。
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Jun 22;18(8):56. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1029-x.
9
The relationship of Type 1 diabetes self-management barriers to child and parent quality of life: a US cross-sectional study.1 型糖尿病自我管理障碍与儿童和家长生活质量的关系:一项美国横断面研究。
Diabet Med. 2018 Nov;35(11):1523-1530. doi: 10.1111/dme.13760. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-centred outcomes research: brave new world meets old institutional policies.以患者为中心的结果研究:全新世界与旧有机构政策的碰撞。
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):296-300. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw129.
2
Whose quality of life is it anyway? Discrepancies between youth and parent health-related quality of life ratings in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.这到底是谁的生活质量?1型和2型糖尿病中青年与父母健康相关生活质量评分的差异。
Qual Life Res. 2016 May;25(5):1113-21. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1158-5. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
3
Seeing Is Believing: Using Skype to Improve Diabetes Outcomes in Youth.眼见为实:使用 Skype 改善青少年的糖尿病治疗效果。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Aug;38(8):1427-34. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2469. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
4
Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry.美国 1 型糖尿病治疗现状:T1D Exchange 诊所注册中心的最新数据。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jun;38(6):971-8. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0078.
5
Trends in the evidence level for the American Diabetes Association's "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" from 2005 to 2014.2005年至2014年美国糖尿病协会《糖尿病医疗护理标准》的证据水平趋势。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):6-8. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2142.
6
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes.2014年国际儿童青少年糖尿病研究学会(ISPAD)临床实践共识指南。糖尿病儿童和青少年血糖控制的评估与监测
Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Sep;15 Suppl 20:102-14. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12190.
7
Development and validation of PRISM: a survey tool to identify diabetes self-management barriers.PRISM的开发与验证:一种用于识别糖尿病自我管理障碍的调查工具
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Apr;104(1):126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
8
Effectiveness of groups for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their parents.针对1型糖尿病青少年及其父母的小组干预效果。
Fam Syst Health. 2013 Sep;31(3):280-93. doi: 10.1037/a0033039. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
9
Family-based psychoeducation and Care Ambassador intervention to improve glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes: a randomized trial.基于家庭的心理教育和关爱大使干预以改善 1 型糖尿病青少年的血糖控制:一项随机试验。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Mar;15(2):142-50. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12065. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
10
Utility of the PedsQL™ family impact module: assessing the psychometric properties in a community sample.儿科生活质量问卷家庭影响模块的效用:在社区样本中评估心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2899-907. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0422-9. Epub 2013 Apr 27.

一项由PCORI资助的关于以家庭为中心定制糖尿病自我管理资源的随机对照试验的设计与基线数据。

Design and baseline data from a PCORI-funded randomized controlled trial of family-centered tailoring of diabetes self-management resources.

作者信息

Fiallo-Scharer Rosanna, Palta Mari, Chewning Betty A, Wysocki Tim, Wetterneck Tosha B, Cox Elizabeth D

机构信息

Medical College of Wisconsin/Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53266, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53726, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53726, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Jul;58:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.007
PMID:28450194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5535788/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This article describes the methodology, recruitment, participant characteristics, and sustained, intensive stakeholder engagement for Project ACE (Achieving control, Connecting resources, Empowering families). Project ACE is a randomized controlled trial of children and youth ages 8-16 with type 1 diabetes evaluating the impact of tailored self-management resources on hemoglobin A1c (A1c) and quality of life (QOL). Despite strong evidence that controlling A1c reduces long-term complications, <25% of US youth with type 1 diabetes meet A1c targets. Many interventions are efficacious in improving A1c and QOL for these youth, whose families often struggle with the substantial demands of the treatment regimen. However, most such interventions are ineffective in the real world due to lack of uptake by families and limited healthcare system resources. Project ACE is a multi-site trial designed to improve diabetes outcomes by tailoring existing, evidence-based interventions to meet families' needs and preferences. We hypothesize that this family-centered approach will result in better A1c and QOL than usual care. Project ACE has recruited and randomized 214 eligible 8-16year old youth and their parents. The 9-month intervention consisted of 4 group sessions tailored to families' self-management barriers as identified by a validated instrument. Outcomes including A1c and QOL for parents and youth will be assessed for 1year after the intervention. Stakeholder engagement was used to enhance this trial's recruitment, retention and integration into routine clinical care. Findings will inform implementation and dissemination of family-centered approaches to address self-management barriers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02024750 Trial Registrar: Clinicaltrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02024750.

摘要

未标注

本文介绍了“ACE项目”(实现控制、连接资源、赋能家庭)的方法、招募情况、参与者特征以及持续且深入的利益相关者参与情况。“ACE项目”是一项针对8至16岁1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的随机对照试验,评估量身定制的自我管理资源对糖化血红蛋白(A1c)和生活质量(QOL)的影响。尽管有充分证据表明控制A1c可减少长期并发症,但美国1型糖尿病青少年中只有不到25%的人达到A1c目标。许多干预措施对改善这些青少年的A1c和QOL有效,但其家庭往往难以应对治疗方案的巨大需求。然而,由于家庭缺乏接受度以及医疗系统资源有限,大多数此类干预措施在现实世界中效果不佳。“ACE项目”是一项多中心试验,旨在通过调整现有的循证干预措施以满足家庭的需求和偏好来改善糖尿病治疗效果。我们假设这种以家庭为中心的方法将比常规护理带来更好的A1c和QOL。“ACE项目”已招募并随机分配了214名符合条件的8至16岁青少年及其父母。为期9个月的干预包括4次根据经过验证的工具确定的家庭自我管理障碍量身定制的小组会议。干预后1年内将评估包括父母和青少年的A1c和QOL在内的结果。利益相关者参与被用于加强该试验的招募、保留以及融入常规临床护理。研究结果将为解决自我管理障碍的以家庭为中心的方法的实施和推广提供参考。

试验注册号

NCT02024750 试验注册机构:Clinicaltrials.gov,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02024750