Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Niels Steensens Vej 6, DK-2820, Gentofte, Denmark.
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Dec;102(12):2238-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
To test whether an intervention consisting of four patient-centered consultations improves glycemic control and self-management skills in patients with poorly regulated type 2 diabetes (T2DM), compared to a control group receiving usual care.
Unblinded parallel randomized controlled trial including 97 adults diagnosed with T2DM ≥ 1 year and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels ≥ 8.0% (64 mmol/mol). Consultations incorporated tools supporting self-reflection, learning processes, and goal setting. Primary outcome was HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were autonomy support, motivation, self-management skills, and well-being.
Average HbA1c decreased slightly in both groups. Autonomy support and frequency of healthy eating were significantly higher in the intervention group. Most participants in the intervention group chose to set goals related to diet and physical exercise. Implementation of the intervention was inconsistent.
Despite increased autonomy support and individual goal-setting, the intervention was not superior to usual care in terms of glycemic control. More research is needed on how individual preferences and goals can be supported in practice to achieve sustainable behavior changes.
The intervention promoted participant engagement and supported exploration of participants' challenges and preferences. Further exploration of more flexible use of tools adapted to individual contexts is recommended.
与接受常规护理的对照组相比,测试由四次以患者为中心的咨询组成的干预措施是否能改善血糖控制和自我管理技能不佳的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血糖控制和自我管理技能。
这是一项非盲平行随机对照试验,纳入了 97 名诊断为 T2DM 超过 1 年且糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平≥8.0%(64mmol/mol)的成年人。咨询采用了支持自我反思、学习过程和目标设定的工具。主要结局指标是 HbA1c。次要结局指标为自主支持、动机、自我管理技能和幸福感。
两组的平均 HbA1c 略有下降。干预组的自主支持和健康饮食频率显著提高。干预组的大多数参与者选择设定与饮食和体育锻炼相关的目标。干预的实施并不一致。
尽管自主支持和个体化目标设定有所增加,但该干预在血糖控制方面并不优于常规护理。需要进一步研究如何在实践中支持个体偏好和目标,以实现可持续的行为改变。
该干预措施促进了参与者的参与,并支持了对参与者的挑战和偏好的探索。建议进一步探索更灵活地使用适用于个体情况的工具。