Plank-Kiegele Bettina, Bürkle Thomas, Müller Fabian, Patapovas Andrius, Sonst Anja, Pfistermeister Barbara, Dormann Harald, Maas Renke
Prof. Dr. med. Renke Maas, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Fahrstr. 17, 91054 Erlangen, Germany, E-mail:
Methods Inf Med. 2017 Aug 11;56(4):276-282. doi: 10.3414/ME16-01-0126. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Adverse drug events (ADE) involving or not involving medication errors (ME) are common, but frequently remain undetected as such. Presently, the majority of available clinical decision support systems (CDSS) relies mostly on coded medication data for the generation of drug alerts. It was the aim of our study to identify the key types of data required for the adequate detection and classification of adverse drug events (ADE) and medication errors (ME) in patients presenting at an emergency department (ED).
As part of a prospective study, ADE and ME were identified in 1510 patients presenting at the ED of an university teaching hospital by an interdisciplinary panel of specialists in emergency medicine, clinical pharmacology and pharmacy. For each ADE and ME the required different clinical data sources (i.e. information items such as acute clinical symptoms, underlying diseases, laboratory values or ECG) for the detection and correct classification were evaluated.
Of all 739 ADE identified 387 (52.4%), 298 (40.3%), 54 (7.3%), respectively, required one, two, or three, more information items to be detected and correctly classified. Only 68 (10.2%) of the ME were simple drug-drug interactions that could be identified based on medication data alone while 381 (57.5%), 181 (27.3%) and 33 (5.0%) of the ME required one, two or three additional information items, respectively, for detection and clinical classification.
Only 10% of all ME observed in emergency patients could be identified on the basis of medication data alone. Focusing electronic decisions support on more easily available drug data alone may lead to an under-detection of clinically relevant ADE and ME.
涉及或不涉及用药错误(ME)的药物不良事件(ADE)很常见,但往往未被识别出来。目前,大多数现有的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)主要依靠编码的用药数据来生成药物警报。我们研究的目的是确定在急诊科(ED)就诊的患者中,对药物不良事件(ADE)和用药错误(ME)进行充分检测和分类所需的关键数据类型。
作为一项前瞻性研究的一部分,由急诊医学、临床药理学和药学领域的跨学科专家小组,在一家大学教学医院的急诊科对1510例就诊患者进行了ADE和ME的识别。对于每一例ADE和ME,评估检测和正确分类所需的不同临床数据源(即急性临床症状、基础疾病、实验室值或心电图等信息项)。
在所有739例ADE中,分别有387例(52.4%)、298例(40.3%)、54例(7.3%)需要一项、两项或三项以上信息项才能被检测和正确分类。只有68例(10.2%)ME是单纯的药物相互作用,仅根据用药数据即可识别,而381例(57.5%)、181例(27.3%)和33例(5.0%)ME分别需要一项、两项或三项额外信息项才能进行检测和临床分类。
在急诊患者中,仅10%的ME可仅根据用药数据识别。仅将电子决策支持聚焦于更容易获取的药物数据,可能会导致对临床相关的ADE和ME检测不足。