Barrio-López Teresa, Ortiz Mercedes, Castellanos Eduardo, Lázaro Carla, Salas Jefferson, Madero Sergio, Almendral Jesús
Electrophysiology Laboratory and Arrhythmia Unit, Hospital Monteprincipe, Grupo HM Hospitales, University CEU-San Pablo, Madrid, Spain.
Unidad de Electrofisiología, Hospital Madrid Montepríncipe, Avda Monteprincipe, 25, 28660, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;49(2):147-155. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0253-7. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between contact force (CF) and pacing threshold in left atrium (LA).
Six to ten LA sites were studied in 28 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Median CF, bipolar and unipolar electrogram voltage, impedance, and bipolar and unipolar thresholds for consistent constant capture and for consistent intermittent capture were measured at each site.
Pacing threshold measurements were performed at 188 LA sites. Both unipolar and bipolar pacing thresholds correlated significantly with median CF; however, unipolar pacing threshold correlated better (unipolar: Pearson R -0.45; p < 0.001; Spearman Rho -0.62; p < 0.001, bipolar: Pearson R -0.39; p < 0.001; Spearman Rho -0.52; p < 0.001). Consistent constant capture threshold had better correlation with median CF than consistent intermittent capture threshold for both unipolar and bipolar pacing (Pearson R -0.45; p < 0.001 and Spearman Rho -0.62; p < 0.001 vs. Pearson R -0.35; p < 0.001; Spearman Rho -0.52; p < 0.001). The best pacing threshold cutoff point to detect a good CF (>10 g) was 3.25 mA for unipolar pacing with 69% specificity and 73% sensitivity. Both increased to 80% specificity and 74% sensitivity for sites with normal bipolar voltage and a pacing threshold cutoff value of 2.85 mA.
Pacing thresholds correlate with CF in human not previously ablated LA. Since the combination of a normal bipolar voltage and a unipolar pacing threshold <2.85 mA provide reasonable parameters of validity, pacing threshold could be of interest as a surrogate for CF in LA.
本研究旨在分析左心房(LA)接触力(CF)与起搏阈值之间的关系。
对28例连续接受肺静脉隔离的房颤患者的6至10个LA部位进行研究。在每个部位测量中位CF、双极和单极心电图电压、阻抗以及持续恒定夺获和持续间歇性夺获的双极和单极阈值。
在188个LA部位进行了起搏阈值测量。单极和双极起搏阈值均与中位CF显著相关;然而,单极起搏阈值的相关性更好(单极:Pearson R -0.45;p <0.001;Spearman Rho -0.62;p <0.001,双极:Pearson R -0.39;p <0.001;Spearman Rho -0.52;p <0.001)。对于单极和双极起搏,持续恒定夺获阈值与中位CF的相关性均优于持续间歇性夺获阈值(Pearson R -0.45;p <0.001和Spearman Rho -0.62;p <0.001对比Pearson R -0.35;p <0.001;Spearman Rho -0.52;p <0.001)。检测良好CF(>10 g)的最佳起搏阈值截止点,单极起搏为3.25 mA,特异性为69%,敏感性为73%。对于双极电压正常且起搏阈值截止值为2.85 mA的部位,特异性和敏感性均提高到80%和74%。
在未经消融的人体LA中,起搏阈值与CF相关。由于正常双极电压和单极起搏阈值<2.85 mA的组合提供了合理的有效性参数,起搏阈值可能作为LA中CF的替代指标受到关注。