• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项为期 4 年的随机试验,比较了三种外展干预措施以促进乳房 X 光筛查。

A 4-year randomized trial comparing three outreach interventions to promote screening mammograms.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):328-335. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby031.

DOI:10.1093/tbm/iby031
PMID:29796649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6610174/
Abstract

As population health has become a focus of health care payers and providers, interest has grown in mail, phone, and other forms of outreach for improving population rates of cancer screening. Translational research is needed to compare the effectiveness and cost of low- and high-intensity behavioral outreach interventions for promoting cancer screening. The purpose of the article is to compare the effectiveness in promoting biannual mammograms of three interventions delivered over 4 years to a primary care population with a high baseline mammography adherence of 83.3%. We randomized women aged 40-84 to reminder letter only (LO arm), letter + reminder call (RC arm), and two letters + counseling call (CC arm) involving tailored education and motivational interviewing. Mammography adherence (≥1 mammogram in the previous 24 months) at four time points was determined from insurance claims records. Over 4 years, 30,162 women were randomized. At the end of 4 years, adherence was highest in the RC arm (83.0%) compared with CC (80.8%) and LO (80.8%) arms (p = .03). Only 23.5% of women in the CC arm were reached and accepted full counseling. The incremental cost per additional mammogram for RC arm women was $30.45 over the LO arm cost. A simple reminder call can increase screening mammogram adherence even when baseline adherence is high. Some more complex behavioral interventions delivered by mail and phone as in this study may be less effective, due to limited participation of patients, a focus on ambivalence, lack of follow-up, and other factors.

摘要

随着人口健康已成为医疗保健支付者和提供者关注的焦点,人们对通过邮件、电话和其他形式的外展来提高人口癌症筛查率的兴趣日益浓厚。需要开展转化研究来比较低强度和高强度行为外展干预措施在促进癌症筛查方面的效果和成本。本文的目的是比较三种干预措施在促进 83.3%基线乳房 X 光筛检依从率较高的初级保健人群中每两年进行一次乳房 X 光检查的效果,这三种干预措施在 4 年内完成。我们将年龄在 40-84 岁的女性随机分配到仅接受提醒信(LO 臂)、信件+提醒电话(RC 臂)和两封信件+咨询电话(CC 臂)组,这些干预措施包括量身定制的教育和动机访谈。通过保险索赔记录确定四个时间点的乳房 X 光筛检依从性(过去 24 个月内至少进行一次乳房 X 光检查)。在 4 年内,有 30162 名女性被随机分配。在 4 年结束时,RC 臂的依从率最高(83.0%),高于 CC 臂(80.8%)和 LO 臂(80.8%)(p =.03)。只有 23.5%的 CC 臂女性接受了全面咨询。与 LO 臂相比,RC 臂女性每增加一次乳房 X 光检查的增量成本为 30.45 美元。即使基线依从率较高,简单的提醒电话也可以提高乳房 X 光筛检的依从率。本研究中通过邮件和电话提供的一些更复杂的行为干预措施可能效果较差,原因是患者参与度有限、关注犹豫不决、缺乏后续行动以及其他因素。

相似文献

1
A 4-year randomized trial comparing three outreach interventions to promote screening mammograms.一项为期 4 年的随机试验,比较了三种外展干预措施以促进乳房 X 光筛查。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):328-335. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby031.
2
Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.在一大群初级保健人群中实施并进行过程评估的三种促进乳腺钼靶筛查干预措施,为期4年。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):547-556. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0497-x.
3
Comparing Telephone Counseling With Reminding to Promote On-Time Repeated Mammography: A Randomized Trial in a Cohort With 4 Years Follow-Up.比较电话咨询与提醒对促进按时重复乳房 X 光检查的效果:一项在具有 4 年随访期的队列中进行的随机试验。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Feb;47(1):37-46. doi: 10.1177/1090198119886347. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
4
Design and methods for a randomized clinical trial comparing three outreach efforts to improve screening mammography adherence.比较三种外展活动以提高筛查乳房 X 光照片检查依从性的随机临床试验的设计和方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun 3;11:145. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-145.
5
A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.三种针对性干预措施提高乳腺钼靶筛查率的成本效益比较。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Oct;13(8):909-18. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.909.
6
Economic Evaluation of Web- versus Telephone-based Interventions to Simultaneously Increase Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening Among Women.基于网络与电话的干预措施同时提高女性结直肠癌与乳腺癌筛查率的经济学评价。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Sep;14(9):905-916. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0009. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
7
Cost-effectiveness of strategies to enhance mammography use.提高乳房X光检查使用率策略的成本效益
Eff Clin Pract. 2000 Sep-Oct;3(5):213-20.
8
Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening.五种增加乳房X光检查筛查率干预措施的成本效益比较
Prev Med. 1999 Nov;29(5):374-82. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0568.
9
Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.乳腺癌筛查外展效果:乳腺 X 光具体提醒与综合预防服务生日信。
Prev Med. 2017 Sep;102:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
10
Enhancing compliance with screening mammography recommendations: a clinical trial in a primary care office.提高乳腺钼靶筛查建议的依从性:一项在初级保健诊所进行的临床试验。
Fam Med. 1995 Feb;27(2):117-21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Telemedicine on Preventive Medicine- A Case from Israel.远程医疗对预防医学的影响——来自以色列的一个案例。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Jun 2;14(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00696-2.
2
Advancing Mammographic Screening Among Underserved Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Strategies to Increase Breast Cancer Screening Uptake.在服务不足群体中推进乳腺钼靶筛查:增加乳腺癌筛查接受率的干预策略的系统评价和荟萃分析
Public Health Rev. 2025 Apr 4;46:1607873. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2025.1607873. eCollection 2025.
3
Increasing screening for breast cancer using a randomized evaluation of electronic health record nudges: Design and rationale of the I-screen clinical trial.通过电子健康记录推动的随机评估增加乳腺癌筛查:I-筛查临床试验的设计与原理
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jan;148:107753. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107753. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
4
Socioeconomic inequalities in uptake of outreach mammography before and after accessibility improvement of Taiwan's national universal breast cancer screening policy.台湾全民乳癌筛检政策实施前后,扩大筛检服务对提升可近性后,接受乳房摄影筛检之社会经济差异。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 8;24(1):2439. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19896-7.
5
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.
6
Association of Electronic Self-Scheduling and Screening Mammogram Completion.电子自助预约与乳房 X 光筛查完成情况的关联。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Mar;66(3):399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.11.002. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
7
Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与乳腺癌筛查就诊相关的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e046660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660.
8
Adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer patients: impact of a health system outreach program to improve adherence.乳腺癌患者的辅助内分泌治疗:改善依从性的卫生系统外展计划的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):219-226. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05539-z. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.在一大群初级保健人群中实施并进行过程评估的三种促进乳腺钼靶筛查干预措施,为期4年。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):547-556. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0497-x.
2
Advancing a Culture of Health: Population Health Programs in Place at Essential Hospitals and Academic Medical Centers (2012-2014).推进健康文化:基层医院和学术医疗中心实施的人群健康项目(2012 - 2014年)
J Healthc Qual. 2016 Mar-Apr;38(2):66-75. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000032.
3
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.平均风险女性的乳腺癌筛查:美国癌症协会2015年指南更新
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12783.
4
Screening for cancer: advice for high-value care from the American College of Physicians.癌症筛查:美国医师学院提供的高价值医疗保健建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):718-25. doi: 10.7326/M14-2326.
5
Evaluating the mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing in the treatment of mental health problems: A review and meta-analysis.评估动机性访谈在心理健康问题治疗中改变机制:综述和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Jun;38:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
6
Get screened: a randomized trial of the incremental benefits of reminders, recall, and outreach on cancer screening.进行筛查:一项关于提醒、召回和外展服务对癌症筛查的增量效益的随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):90-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2586-y.
7
Motivational interviewing with primary care populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对基层医疗人群的动机性访谈:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Behav Med. 2014 Aug;37(4):768-80. doi: 10.1007/s10865-013-9527-4. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
8
Effectiveness of a motivational interviewing intervention on weight loss, physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomised controlled trial with a 12-month post-intervention follow-up.动机性访谈干预对体重减轻、身体活动和心血管疾病风险因素的效果:一项随机对照试验,干预后随访 12 个月。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Mar 28;10:40. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-40.
9
Training practitioners to deliver opportunistic multiple behaviour change counselling in primary care: a cluster randomised trial.培训初级保健医生进行机会性多种行为改变咨询:一项集群随机试验。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 19;346:f1191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1191.
10
Telephone counseling and attendance in a national mammography-screening program a randomized controlled trial.电话咨询和参与全国乳腺 X 光筛查计划:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Oct;41(4):421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.040.