• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《暗区中窥淫癖的观看反应时间作为诊断工具》

The Viewing Reaction Time as a Diagnostic Tool of Pedohebephilia in the Dunkelfeld.

机构信息

Institut für Sexualwissenschaft und Sexualmedizin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Luisenstraße 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, CCM, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and HumboldtUniversität zu Berlin, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, CCM, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):25-42. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02662-y. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10508-023-02662-y
PMID:37594679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10794365/
Abstract

Diagnosing pedohebephilia is fraught with obstacles given the tabooed nature of this sexual preference. The viewing reaction time effect (VRT) provides a non-intrusive indirect measure of sexual interest in minors. In forensic populations, the ability of the difference between the latencies while viewing child and adult sexual stimuli (VRT index) to discern child sexual offenders from a range of control groups has been ascertained meta-analytically. Given that the effect has been studied almost exclusively in forensic samples, its dependence or independence on prior overt (deviant) sexual behavior remains unclear. The present study sought to examine the relationship of prior sexual and non-sexual behaviors with the VRT in a sample of 282 self-referring, help-seeking men with and without pedohebephilia with and without a history of prior child sexual offenses (CSO) or a use of child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) recruited outside a forensic context. We found that (1) the clinical diagnosis of pedohebephilia but not prior CSO or CSAM showed a significant association with the VRT index; (2) the discriminatory ability of the VRT index did not differ significantly between samples with and without a history of prior overt sexual behavior with children; (3) the VRT index correlated positively with a behavioral marker of pedohebephilia in a subsample of individuals with prior judicially detected or undetected overt sexual behavior with children; and (4) in the same subsample, the VRT index correlated positively with markers of sexual interests in minors or hypersexuality but not of antisociality. Equivalence testing failed to refute a potential effect of prior sexual behavior on the VRT index. Our study showed that the VRT may provide an unintrusive diagnostic tool for pedohebephilia. The effect of prior overt sexual behavior with children needs further examination.

摘要

诊断恋童癖和恋少癖是困难的,因为这种性偏好具有禁忌性。观看反应时效应(VRT)提供了一种非侵入性的间接测量对未成年人的性兴趣的方法。在法医人群中,通过比较观看儿童和成人色情刺激时的潜伏期差异(VRT 指数)来区分儿童性犯罪者和一系列对照组的能力已经通过元分析得到了确定。鉴于该效应几乎仅在法医样本中进行了研究,因此其对先前明显(异常)性行为的依赖性或独立性仍不清楚。本研究旨在检查 282 名自我报告、寻求帮助的男性样本中,先前的性和非性行为与 VRT 的关系,这些男性有或没有恋童癖和恋少癖,有或没有先前的儿童性犯罪史(CSO)或使用儿童性虐待材料(CSAM),这些参与者是在法医背景之外招募的。我们发现:(1)恋童癖和恋少癖的临床诊断与 VRT 指数显著相关,但先前的 CSO 或 CSAM 则没有;(2)VRT 指数的判别能力在有无先前与儿童发生明显性行为史的样本之间没有显著差异;(3)VRT 指数与具有先前被司法发现或未被发现的与儿童发生明显性行为的个体亚样本中的恋童癖行为标志物呈正相关;(4)在同一亚样本中,VRT 指数与对未成年人的性兴趣或性欲的标志物呈正相关,但与反社会行为的标志物无关。等效性检验未能反驳先前性行为对 VRT 指数的潜在影响。我们的研究表明,VRT 可能为恋童癖和恋少癖提供一种非侵入性的诊断工具。先前与儿童发生明显性行为的影响需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa50/10794365/c4d593a415b2/10508_2023_2662_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa50/10794365/ef1a89c99b7e/10508_2023_2662_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa50/10794365/c4d593a415b2/10508_2023_2662_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa50/10794365/ef1a89c99b7e/10508_2023_2662_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa50/10794365/c4d593a415b2/10508_2023_2662_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Viewing Reaction Time as a Diagnostic Tool of Pedohebephilia in the Dunkelfeld.《暗区中窥淫癖的观看反应时间作为诊断工具》
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):25-42. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02662-y. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) May Be a Measure of Pedohebephilia.修订后的恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)可能是恋童癖和恋少癖的一种测量工具。
J Sex Med. 2019 Oct;16(10):1655-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
3
The German Dunkelfeld project: a pilot study to prevent child sexual abuse and the use of child abusive images.德国“暗网”项目:一项预防儿童性虐待及儿童虐待图像使用的试点研究。
J Sex Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):529-42. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12785. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
4
Evidence of Construct Validity in the Assessment of Hebephilia.青春期恋评估中结构效度的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jan;46(1):301-309. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0907-z. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
5
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia.青少年色情癖阴茎测量测试的敏感性和特异性。
J Sex Med. 2015 Sep;12(9):1940-50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12970. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
6
Pedohebephilia and Perceived Non-coercive Childhood Sexual Experiences: Two Non-matched Case-Control Studies.恋童癖和性虐待倾向与儿童期非强迫性性经历的关联:两项非匹配病例对照研究。
Sex Abuse. 2023 Apr;35(3):340-374. doi: 10.1177/10790632221098341. Epub 2022 May 12.
7
Neurodevelopmental Differences, Pedohebephilia, and Sexual Offending: Findings from Two Online Surveys.神经发育差异、恋童癖和性犯罪:两项在线调查的结果。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):849-866. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02228-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
8
Potential and Dunkelfeld offenders: two neglected target groups for prevention of child sexual abuse.潜在和隐性施害者:儿童性虐待预防中被忽视的两个目标群体。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 May-Jun;33(3):154-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 May 13.
9
Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia.恋童癖的阴茎测量诊断。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989 Feb;57(1):100-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.57.1.100.
10
Hebephilia as a sexual disorder.青春期前儿童恋[癖]作为一种性障碍。
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2015 Feb;83(2):e1-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398960. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurodevelopmental Differences, Pedohebephilia, and Sexual Offending: Findings from Two Online Surveys.神经发育差异、恋童癖和性犯罪:两项在线调查的结果。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):849-866. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02228-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
International overview of phallometric testing for sexual offending behaviour and sexual risk.性犯罪行为与性风险的阴茎测量测试国际综述
BJPsych Int. 2021 Nov;18(4):E11. doi: 10.1192/bji.2021.17.
3
How well do indirect measures assess sexual interest in children? A meta-analysis.间接测量评估儿童性兴趣的效果如何?一项荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;89(4):350-363. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000627. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Indirect and Neuropsychological Indicators of Pedophilia.恋童癖的间接和神经心理学指标。
Sex Abuse. 2021 Aug;33(5):579-605. doi: 10.1177/1079063220931822. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Stigmatization of Paraphilias and Psychological Conditions Linked to Sexual Offending.性偏好障碍和与性犯罪相关的心理状况的污名化。
J Sex Res. 2021 May;58(4):438-447. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1754748. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Worldwide Secular Trends in Age at Pubertal Onset Assessed by Breast Development Among Girls: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球范围内通过女孩乳房发育评估的青春期启动年龄的季节性趋势:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 1;174(4):e195881. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5881. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
The Prevalence of Paraphilic Interests in the Czech Population: Preference, Arousal, the Use of Pornography, Fantasy, and Behavior.捷克人口中偏常性兴趣的流行情况:偏好、唤起、色情制品使用、幻想和行为。
J Sex Res. 2021 Jan;58(1):86-96. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1707468. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Advances in the Assessment of Sexual Deviance.性变态评估的进展。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Jul 21;20(8):55. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0918-7.
9
Diagnostic Issues in the Paraphilias.性偏好障碍的诊断问题。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Jul 21;20(8):54. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0919-6.
10
Clinical characteristics associated with paedophilia and child sex offending - Differentiating sexual preference from offence status.与恋童癖和儿童性犯罪相关的临床特征-将性偏好与犯罪状态区分开来。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;51:74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Apr 4.