Suppr超能文献

抗疟药物青蒿素在酵母中诱导一种额外的、Sod1 抑制的抗线粒体作用。

The antimalarial drug artemisinin induces an additional, Sod1-supressible anti-mitochondrial action in yeast.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017 Jul;1864(7):1285-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

Abstract

The molecular action of artemisinins (ARTs) is not well understood. To determine the molecular and cellular basis that might underlie their differential effects observed in anti-malarial and anti-cancer studies, we utilized the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to examine their toxicity profiles and properties. Previously we reported that while both low levels (2-8μM) of artemisinin (ART) and dihydroartemisinin (DHA) partly depolarize the mitochondrial membranes, inhibiting yeast growth on non-fermentable media, only DHA at moderate levels (such as 40μM) potently represses yeast growth on fermentable media via a heme-mediated pathway. Here we show that the lack of toxicity of ART even at high levels (200-400μM) on fermentable medium is due to the presence of Sod1. While we expected this normally Sod1-supressed action to be heme-mediated like DHA, surprisingly, this toxicity of ART is due to further depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane. We also found that for DHA, the Sod1-suppressible anti-mitochondrial action is hidden by its heme-mediated cytotoxicity, and becomes readily noticeable only when the heme-mediated action is compromised and Sod1 is inactivated. Based on these findings, we propose that depending on the cell type and particular compound, ARTs work via one or more of the three types of activities: a Sod1-independent, partial mitochondria-depolarizing action; a Sod1-suppressible, more severe mitochondria-depolarizing action; and a heme-mediated general cytotoxicity. These action properties may underlie the disparities seen in the efficacy and toxicity of various ARTs, and additionally suggest it is important for researchers to clearly detail the particular compound when reporting on the effects of ARTs.

摘要

青蒿素(ARTs)的分子作用机制尚不清楚。为了确定可能是导致其在抗疟和抗癌研究中表现出不同效果的分子和细胞基础,我们利用酵母酿酒酵母来研究其毒性特征和性质。之前我们曾报道,虽然低浓度(2-8μM)青蒿素(ART)和双氢青蒿素(DHA)部分去极化线粒体膜,抑制酵母在非发酵培养基中的生长,但只有中等浓度(如 40μM)的 DHA 能够通过血红素介导的途径强烈抑制酵母在发酵培养基中的生长。在这里,我们表明,ART 即使在高浓度(200-400μM)下也没有毒性发酵培养基是由于 Sod1 的存在。虽然我们预计这种通常由 Sod1 抑制的作用与 DHA 一样是血红素介导的,但令人惊讶的是,ART 的这种毒性是由于线粒体膜进一步去极化引起的。我们还发现,对于 DHA,Sod1 抑制的抗线粒体作用被其血红素介导的细胞毒性所掩盖,只有当血红素介导的作用受到损害且 Sod1 失活时,这种毒性才会变得明显。基于这些发现,我们提出,取决于细胞类型和特定化合物,ARTs 通过一种或多种以下三种类型的活性起作用:Sod1 非依赖性、部分线粒体去极化作用;Sod1 抑制、更严重的线粒体去极化作用;和血红素介导的一般细胞毒性。这些作用特性可能是各种 ARTs 疗效和毒性差异的基础,此外还表明,研究人员在报告 ARTs 的影响时,详细说明特定化合物非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验