Williams C A L, Panerai R B, Robinson T G, Haunton V J
University of Leicester, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Leicester, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Disease, British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
J Neurosci Methods. 2017 Jun 1;284:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
We tested the hypothesis that paradigms from the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III), including those that had not been studied using TCD previously (novel) versus those which had been (established), would elicit changes in CBF velocity (CBFv).
Healthy subjects were studied with bilateral transcranial Doppler (TCD), beat-to-beat blood pressure (Finapres), continuous electrocardiogram (ECG), and end-tidal CO (nasal capnography). After a 5-min baseline recording, cognitive tests of the ACE-III were presented to subjects, covering attention (SUB7, subtracting 7 from 100 sequentially), language (REP, repeating words and phrases), fluency (N-P, naming words), visuospatial (DRAW, clock-drawing), and memory (MEM, recalling name and address). An event marker noted question timing.
Forty bilateral data sets were obtained (13 males, 37 right-hand dominant) with a median age of 31 years (IQR 22-52). Population normalized mean peak CBFv% in the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres, respectively, were: SUB7 (11.3±9.6%, 11.2±10.5%), N-P (12.7±11.7%, 11.5±12.0%), REP (12.9±11.7%, 11.6±11.6%), DRAW (13.3±11.7%, 13.2±15.4%) and MEM (13.2±10.3%, 12.0±10.1%). There was a significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant CBFv responses (p<0.008), but no difference between the amplitude of responses.
For established paradigms, our results are in excellent agreement to what has been found previously in the middle cerebral artery.
Cognitive paradigms derived from the ACE-III led to significant lateralised changes in CBFv that were not distinct for novel paradigms. Further work is needed to assess the potential of paradigms to improve the interpretation of cognitive assessments in patients at risk of mild cognitive impairment.
我们检验了以下假设,即来自剑桥认知评估量表(ACE-III)的测试范式,包括那些之前未使用经颅多普勒(TCD)研究过的范式(新范式)与那些已经研究过的范式(既定范式),是否会引起脑血流速度(CBFv)的变化。
对健康受试者进行双侧经颅多普勒(TCD)、逐搏血压(Finapres)、连续心电图(ECG)和呼气末二氧化碳监测(鼻罩式二氧化碳描记法)。在5分钟的基线记录后,向受试者呈现ACE-III的认知测试,包括注意力(SUB7,从100开始依次减7)、语言(REP,重复单词和短语)、流畅性(N-P,说出单词)、视觉空间能力(DRAW,画钟)和记忆(MEM,回忆姓名和地址)。一个事件标记记录问题出现的时间。
共获得40个双侧数据集(13名男性,37名右利手),中位年龄为31岁(四分位间距22 - 52岁)。优势半球和非优势半球的总体标准化平均CBFv峰值百分比分别为:SUB7(11.3±9.6%,11.2±10.5%)、N-P(12.7±11.7%,11.5±12.0%)、REP(12.9±11.7%,11.6±11.6%)、DRAW(13.3±11.7%,13.2±15.4%)和MEM(13.2±10.3%,12. ±10.1%)。优势半球和非优势半球的CBFv反应存在显著差异(p<0.008),但反应幅度无差异。
对于既定范式,我们的结果与先前在大脑中动脉中发现的结果高度一致。
源自ACE-III的认知范式导致CBFv出现显著的侧化变化,新范式与既定范式之间无明显差异。需要进一步开展工作,以评估这些范式在改善对有轻度认知障碍风险患者的认知评估解释方面的潜力。