Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):833-843. doi: 10.1152/jn.00175.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
Neural stimulation leads to increases in cerebral blood flow (CBF), but simultaneous changes in covariates, such as arterial blood pressure (BP) and , rule out the use of CBF changes as a reliable marker of neurovascular coupling (NVC) integrity. Healthy subjects performed repetitive (1 Hz) passive elbow flexion with their dominant arm for 60 s. CBF velocity (CBFV) was recorded bilaterally in the middle cerebral artery with transcranial Doppler, BP with the Finometer device, and end-tidal CO (EtCO) with capnography. The simultaneous effects of neural stimulation, BP, and on CBFV were expressed with a dynamic multivariate model, using BP, EtCO, and stimulation [()] as inputs. Two versions of () were considered: a gate function [()] or an orthogonal decomposition [()] function. A separate CBFV step response was extracted from the model for each of the three inputs, providing estimates of dynamic cerebral autoregulation [CA; autoregulation index (ARI)], CO reactivity [vasomotor reactivity step response (VMR)], and NVC [stimulus step response (STIM)]. In 56 subjects, 224 model implementations produced excellent predictive CBFV correlation (median = 0.995). Model-generated (), for both dominant (DH) and nondominant (NDH) hemispheres, was highly significant during stimulation (<10) and was correlated with the CBFV change ( = 0.73, = 0.0001). The () explained a greater fraction of CBFV variance (~50%) than () (44%, = 0.002). Most CBFV step responses to the three inputs were physiologically plausible, with better agreement for the CBFV-BP step response yielding ARI values of 7.3 for both DH and NDH for (), and 6.9 and 7.4 for (), respectively. No differences between DH and NDH were observed for VMR or STIM. A new procedure is proposed to represent the contribution from other aspects of CBF regulation than BP and CO in response to sensorimotor stimulation as a tool for integrated, noninvasive, assessment of the multiple influences of dynamic CA, CO reactivity, and NVC in humans. A new approach was proposed to identify the separate contributions of stimulation, arterial blood pressure (BP), and arterial CO () to the cerebral blood flow (CBF) response observed in neurovascular coupling (NVC) studies in humans. Instead of adopting an empirical gate function to represent the stimulation input, a model-generated function is derived as part of the modeling process, providing a representation of the NVC response, independent of the contributions of BP or . This new marker of NVC, together with the model-predicted outputs for the contributions of BP, and stimulation, has considerable potential to both quantify and simultaneously integrate the separate mechanisms involved in CBF regulation, namely, cerebral autoregulation, CO reactivity and other contributions.
神经刺激会导致脑血流 (CBF) 增加,但同时存在动脉血压 (BP) 和 等协变量的变化,这排除了将 CBF 变化用作神经血管耦合 (NVC) 完整性的可靠标志物。健康受试者用优势手臂进行 60 秒重复 (1 Hz) 被动肘部弯曲。使用经颅多普勒记录双侧大脑中动脉的 CBF 速度 (CBFV),使用 Finometer 设备测量 BP,使用 capnography 测量呼气末 CO (EtCO)。使用动态多变量模型表达神经刺激、BP 和 对 CBFV 的同时影响,使用 BP、EtCO 和刺激 [()] 作为输入。考虑了 () 的两种版本:门函数 [()] 或正交分解 [()] 函数。从模型中为每个三个输入中的每一个提取单独的 CBFV 阶跃响应,提供动态脑自动调节 [CA;自动调节指数 (ARI)]、CO 反应性 [血管运动反应阶跃响应 (VMR)] 和 NVC [刺激阶跃响应 (STIM)] 的估计值。在 56 名受试者中,224 个模型实现产生了出色的预测 CBFV 相关性 (中位数 = 0.995)。模型生成的 (),对于优势 (DH) 和非优势 (NDH) 半球,在刺激期间均具有高度显著性 (<10),并且与 CBFV 变化相关 (= 0.73,= 0.0001)。() 解释了 CBFV 方差的更大部分 (~50%),而 () 解释了 44%,= 0.002)。对于三个输入的大多数 CBFV 阶跃响应在生理上都是合理的,对于 CBFV-BP 阶跃响应,DH 和 NDH 的 ARI 值分别为 7.3 和 7.4,对于 (),DH 和 NDH 的 ARI 值分别为 6.9 和 7.4。DH 和 NDH 之间在 VMR 或 STIM 方面没有差异。提出了一种新的方法来表示除 BP 和 CO 之外的其他方面对脑血流 (CBF) 调节的贡献,作为一种工具,用于对人类中动态 CA、CO 反应性和 NVC 的多个影响进行综合、非侵入性评估。提出了一种新的方法来识别刺激、动脉血压 (BP) 和动脉 CO () 对人类神经血管耦合 (NVC) 研究中观察到的 CBF 反应的单独贡献。代替采用经验门函数来表示刺激输入,模型生成的函数作为建模过程的一部分被推导出来,为 NVC 响应提供了一种表示,独立于 BP 或 的贡献。这个新的 NVC 标志物,加上模型预测的 BP、和刺激的贡献输出,具有相当大的潜力来量化和同时整合 CBF 调节中涉及的单独机制,即脑自动调节、CO 反应性和其他贡献。