Accuracy of testing for anti- IgG in urine for infection diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aims to systematically measure the potential diagnostic value of anti- IgG in urine for infection diagnosis, using all eligible studies published in English and Chinese languages.

DESIGN

The random effect model was used to analyse the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative LR (NLR), diagnostic OR (DOR), together with the summary receiver operator characteristic curve.

SETTING

Literature searches of databases including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases were performed to retrieve studies evaluating the diagnostic value of urine IgG antibody for infection.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Twenty-three studies with 4963 subjects were included in the current meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.83 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.85), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.90), 8.81 (95% CI 6.37 to 12.2), 0.13 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.2), 73 (95% CI 46.45 to 114.74) and 0.9551, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that diagnostic accuracy of the urine IgG assay was no different in age, region, study population and assay method.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti- antibody in urine might serve as a good marker in diagnosing infection. However, further validation based on a larger sample is still required.