• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产瘢痕妊娠与胎盘植入:不同还是相似?

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Different or Similar?

作者信息

Pekar-Zlotin Marina, Melcer Yaakov, Levinsohn-Tavor Orna, Tovbin Josef, Vaknin Zvi, Maymon Ron

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Isr Med Assoc J. 2017 Mar;19(3):168-171.

PMID:28457095
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence suggests that cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) may represent a continuum of the same disease.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate and compare the prior risk factors in women with either CSP or MAP.

METHODS

The study included 33 women diagnosed with CSP in our department between 2006 and 2014. For each CSP case, two pregnant patients with MAP were matched for hospitalization date from delivery ward records, constituting the control group.

RESULTS

In both groups, maternal age, parity, and previous early and late abortions were similar. The rate of conception by assisted reproductive technologies was 9% in both groups. Although the number of previous cesarean sections was statistically different between CSP versus MAP (2.0 ± 1.0 vs. 1.0 ± 1.0, respectively, P = 0.006), the leading indication of previous cesarean section was breech presentation in both groups (28.1% and 27.8%, respectively, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CSP and MAP share similar prior risk factors. Due to high morbidity in both diseases, further research is needed toward reducing the known etiological factors contributing to the growing number of both complications.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)和胎盘植入(MAP)可能是同一种疾病的连续过程。

目的

调查并比较CSP或MAP女性患者的既往危险因素。

方法

本研究纳入了2006年至2014年间在我科诊断为CSP的33名女性患者。对于每例CSP病例,从分娩病房记录中选取两名与CSP患者住院日期匹配的MAP孕妇作为对照组。

结果

两组患者的产妇年龄、产次以及既往早期和晚期流产情况相似。两组通过辅助生殖技术受孕的比例均为9%。虽然CSP组与MAP组既往剖宫产次数在统计学上存在差异(分别为2.0±1.0次和1.0±1.0次,P=0.006),但两组既往剖宫产的主要指征均为臀位(分别为28.1%和27.8%,P>0.05)。

结论

CSP和MAP具有相似的既往危险因素。由于这两种疾病的发病率都很高,因此需要进一步研究以减少导致这两种并发症数量不断增加的已知病因因素。

相似文献

1
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Morbidly Adherent Placenta: Different or Similar?剖宫产瘢痕妊娠与胎盘植入:不同还是相似?
Isr Med Assoc J. 2017 Mar;19(3):168-171.
2
Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠与早期胎盘植入具有共同的组织学特征。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;43(4):383-95. doi: 10.1002/uog.13282.
3
Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠后的生殖结局——病例系列及文献综述
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 May;200:102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.039. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
4
Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠是凶险性前置胎盘的前驱病变。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;44(3):346-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.13426. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
5
[Expectant management of 11 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy].11例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的期待治疗
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Sep 25;52(9):594-599. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.09.004.
6
Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的生殖结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Oct;99(10):1278-1289. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13918. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
7
Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠在产前超声检查中的自然史:交叉征
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;50(1):100-104. doi: 10.1002/uog.16216. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted "on the scar" versus "in the niche".剖宫产瘢痕妊娠“着床于瘢痕”与“着床于憩室”的临床结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):510.e1-510.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
9
Cesarean scar pregnancy and placenta accreta.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠与胎盘植入。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;43(4):361-2. doi: 10.1002/uog.13346.
10
When a cesarean section scar is more than an innocent bystander in a subsequent pregnancy: Ultrasound to the rescue.当剖宫产瘢痕在后续妊娠中不仅仅是一个无辜的旁观者时:超声来救援。
J Clin Ultrasound. 2017 Jul 8;45(6):319-327. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22485. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的新超声分级系统及其对管理策略的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202020. eCollection 2018.