Amoush Ahmad, Long Huang, Subedi Laxmi, Qi Peng, Djemil Toufik, Xia Ping
Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912; Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195.
University of Utah, 1950 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Med Dosim. 2017;42(2):111-115. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
This work aimed to study the dosimetric effect of multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf widths in treatment plans for patients receiving volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Thirteen patients treated with spine SBRT were retrospectively selected for this study. The patients were treated following the protocol of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0631 (RTOG 0631) for spine metastasis. The prescription dose was 16 Gy in 1 fraction to 90% of the target volume (V16 > 90%). The maximum spinal cord dose of 14 Gy and 10% of the spinal cord receiving < 10 Gy (V10) were the acceptable tolerance doses. For the purpose of this study, 2 dual-arc VMAT plans were created for each patient using 3 different MLC leaf widths: 2.5 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm. The compliance with the RTOG 0631 protocol, conformity index (CI), dose gradient index (DGI), and number of monitor units (MUs) were compared. The average V16Gy of the targets was 91.8 ± 1.2%, 92.2 ± 2.1%, and 91.7 ± 2.3% for 2.5-mm, 4-mm, and 5-mm leaf widths, respectively (p = 0.78). Accordingly, the average CI was 1.45 ± 0.4, 1.47 ± 0.29, and 1.47 ± 0.31 (p = 0.98), respectively. The average DGI was 0.22 ± 0.04, 0.20 ± 0.06, and 0.22 ± 0.05, respectively (p = 0.77). The average maximum dose to the spinal cord was 12.45 ± 1.0 Gy, 12.80 ± 1.0 Gy, and 12.48 ± 1.1 (p = 0.62) and V10% of the spinal cord was 3.6 ± 2.1%, 5.6 ± 2.8%, and 5.5 ± 3.0% (p = 0.11) for 2.5-mm, 4-mm, and 5-mm leaf widths, respectively. Accordingly, the average number of MUs was 4341 ± 500 MU, 5019 ± 834 MU, and 4606 ± 691 MU, respectively (p = 0.053). The use of 2.5-mm, 4-mm, and 5-mm MLCs achieved similar VMAT plan quality as recommended by the RTOG 0631. The dosimetric parameters were also comparable for the 3 MLCs. In general, any of these leaf widths can be used for spine SBRT using VMAT.
本研究旨在探讨在接受脊柱立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)的容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)患者的治疗计划中,多叶准直器(MLC)叶片宽度的剂量学效应。本研究回顾性选取了13例接受脊柱SBRT治疗的患者。患者按照放射治疗肿瘤学组0631(RTOG 0631)脊柱转移瘤方案进行治疗。处方剂量为16 Gy,单次照射至靶区体积的90%(V16>90%)。脊髓最大剂量14 Gy以及10%的脊髓接受剂量<10 Gy(V10)为可接受的耐受剂量。为进行本研究,为每位患者使用3种不同的MLC叶片宽度(2.5 mm、4 mm和5 mm)创建了2个双弧VMAT计划。比较了符合RTOG 0631方案的情况、适形指数(CI)、剂量梯度指数(DGI)和监测单位(MU)数量。对于2.5 mm、4 mm和5 mm的叶片宽度,靶区的平均V16Gy分别为91.8±1.2%、92.2±2.1%和91.7±2.3%(p = 0.78)。相应地,平均CI分别为1.45±0.4、1.47±0.29和1.47±0.31(p = 0.98)。平均DGI分别为0.22±0.04、0.20±0.06和0.22±0.05(p = 0.77)。脊髓的平均最大剂量分别为12.45±1.0 Gy、12.80±1.0 Gy和12.48±1.1(p = 0.62),脊髓的V10%分别为3.6±2.1%、5.6±2.8%和5.5±3.0%(p = 0.11)。相应地,平均MU数量分别为4341±500 MU, 5019±834 MU和4606±691 MU(p = 0.053)。使用2.5 mm、4 mm和5 mm的MLC实现了与RTOG 0631推荐的相似的VMAT计划质量。这3种MLC的剂量学参数也具有可比性。总体而言,这些叶片宽度中的任何一种均可用于采用VMAT的脊柱SBRT。