Suppr超能文献

采用微创外科技术行腰骶部固定治疗复杂骶骨骨折的疗效

Outcomes of lumbopelvic fixation in the treatment of complex sacral fractures using minimally invasive surgical techniques.

作者信息

Jazini Ehsan, Weir Tristan, Nwodim Emeka, Tannous Oliver, Saifi Comron, Caffes Nicholas, Costales Timothy, Koh Eugene, Banagan Kelley, Gelb Daniel, Ludwig Steven C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland, 110 South Paca St, 6th Floor, Suite 300, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, Ste PH11, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2017 Sep;17(9):1238-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.032. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Complex sacral fractures with vertical and anterior pelvic ring instability treated with traditional fixation methods are associated with high rates of failure and poor clinical outcomes. Supplemental lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) has been applied for additional stability to help with fracture union.

PURPOSE

The study aimed to determine whether minimally invasive LPF provides reliable fracture stability and acceptable complication rates in cases of complex sacral fractures.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a retrospective cohort study at a single level I trauma center.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The sample includes 24 patients who underwent minimally invasive LPF for complex sacral fracture with or without associated pelvic ring injury.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reoperation for all causes, loss of fixation, surgical time, transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, postoperative day at mobilization, and mortality were evaluated.

METHODS

Patient charts from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. Of the 32 patients who underwent minimally invasive LPF for complex sacral fractures, 24 (12 male, 12 female) met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcome measures were assessed with a retrospective chart review and radiographic review. The authors did not receive external funding for this study.

RESULTS

Acute reoperation was 12%, and elective reoperation was 29%. Two (8%) patients returned to the operating room for infection, one (4.2%) required revision for instrumentation malposition, and seven (29%) underwent elective removal of instrumentation. No patient experienced failure of instrumentation or loss of correction. Average surgical time was 3.6 hours, blood loss was 180 mL, transfusion requirement was 2.1 units of packed red blood cells, and postoperative mobilization was on postoperative day 5. No mortalities occurred as a result of the minimally invasive LPF procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with historic reports of open LPF, our results demonstrate reliable maintenance of reduction and acceptable complication rates with minimally invasive LPF for complexsacral fractures. The benefits of minimally invasive LPF may be offset with increased elective reoperations for removal of instrumentation.

摘要

背景

采用传统固定方法治疗伴有垂直和骨盆前环不稳定的复杂骶骨骨折,失败率高且临床效果不佳。补充性腰骶部固定(LPF)已被用于增强稳定性以促进骨折愈合。

目的

本研究旨在确定在复杂骶骨骨折病例中,微创LPF是否能提供可靠的骨折稳定性及可接受的并发症发生率。

研究设计/地点:这是一项在单一的I级创伤中心进行的回顾性队列研究。

患者样本

样本包括24例接受微创LPF治疗的复杂骶骨骨折患者,伴有或不伴有骨盆环损伤。

观察指标

评估因各种原因进行的再次手术、内固定失败、手术时间、输血需求、住院时间、术后开始活动的天数以及死亡率。

方法

回顾了2008年至2014年的患者病历。在32例接受微创LPF治疗复杂骶骨骨折的患者中,24例(12例男性,12例女性)符合所有纳入和排除标准。通过回顾性病历审查和影像学检查评估观察指标。作者未获得本研究的外部资金。

结果

急性再次手术率为12%,择期再次手术率为29%。2例(8%)患者因感染返回手术室,1例(4.2%)因器械位置不当需要翻修,7例(29%)接受了器械的择期取出。没有患者出现内固定失败或矫正丢失。平均手术时间为3.6小时,失血量为180毫升,输血需求为2.1单位浓缩红细胞,术后第5天开始活动。微创LPF手术未导致死亡。

结论

与开放性LPF的既往报道相比,我们的结果表明,微创LPF治疗复杂骶骨骨折能可靠地维持复位,并发症发生率可接受。微创LPF的益处可能会因器械取出的择期再次手术增加而被抵消。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验