Sohil Pothiawala, Hao Pua Yong, Mark Leong
Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Department of Physiotherapy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
World J Emerg Med. 2017;8(2):110-115. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.02.005.
Musculoskeletal complaints, especially non-traumatic neck and back pain, are routinely encountered in the emergency department (ED) and lead to ED overcrowding, a burgeoning wait time for physiotherapy and outpatient orthopedic reviews. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of early physiotherapy evaluation and treatment (EPET) vs. standard care (SC) on clinical outcomes for patients presenting to the ED with non-traumatic neck and back pain.
A retrospective observational study of 125 patients who presented to the ED with non-traumatic neck and back pain with/without peripheral symptoms from July 2010 to February 2011. Neck Disability Index (NDI), Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (MODI) and 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale were used as outcome measures and compared between groups at a mean of 34 days from their initial ED visit.
We identified a total of 125 patients. EPET group comprised 62 patients (mean age, 45 years; men, 63%) and SC group comprised 63 patients (mean age, 45 years; men, 43%). The EPET and SC groups received physiotherapy at a median of 4 and 34 days respectively from their first ED visit. EPET patients had significantly lower levels of disability (9.0% vs. 33.4%, Welch -test, <0.001) and pain (median value, 1 vs. 4 points, Mann-Whitney -test, <0.001) compared with SC patients.
Early access to physiotherapy in ED was associated with reduced pain and disability levels. EPET protocol can potentially decrease the demand on outpatient orthopedic services, thereby freeing up available resources to treat patients who are more likely to benefit from it.
肌肉骨骼问题,尤其是非创伤性颈肩痛和腰背痛,在急诊科很常见,会导致急诊科过度拥挤,物理治疗和门诊骨科复诊的等待时间不断延长。本研究旨在评估早期物理治疗评估与治疗(EPET)与标准护理(SC)对因非创伤性颈肩痛和腰背痛就诊于急诊科的患者临床结局的影响。
一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象为2010年7月至2011年2月期间因非创伤性颈肩痛和腰背痛伴或不伴有周围症状就诊于急诊科的125例患者。采用颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、改良奥斯维斯特腰背痛功能障碍问卷(MODI)和11点数字疼痛评分量表作为结局指标,并在患者首次就诊急诊科平均34天后对两组进行比较。
共纳入125例患者。EPET组62例(平均年龄45岁;男性占63%),SC组63例(平均年龄45岁;男性占43%)。EPET组和SC组分别在首次就诊急诊科后中位数4天和34天接受物理治疗。与SC组患者相比,EPET组患者的残疾水平(9.0%对33.4%,韦尔奇检验,<0.001)和疼痛程度(中位数,1分对4分,曼-惠特尼检验,<0.001)显著更低。
在急诊科尽早接受物理治疗与疼痛和残疾水平降低相关。EPET方案可能会减少对门诊骨科服务的需求,从而腾出可用资源来治疗更可能从中受益的患者。