Bidell Markus P
a Department of Educational Foundations and Counseling Programs , Hunter College of the City University of New York , New York , New York , USA.
J Homosex. 2017;64(10):1432-1460. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1321389.
These three studies provide initial evidence for the development, factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (LGBT-DOCSS), a new interdisciplinary LGBT clinical self-assessment for health and mental health providers. Research participants were voluntarily recruited in the United States and United Kingdom and included trainees, clinicians, and educators from applied psychology, counseling, psychotherapy, and primary care medicine. Study 1 (N = 602) used exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic techniques, revealing an 18-item three-factor structure (Clinical Preparedness, Attitudinal Awareness, and Basic Knowledge). Study 2 established internal consistency for the overall LGBT-DOCSS (α = .86) and for each of the three subscales (Clinical Preparedness = .88, Attitudinal Awareness = .80, and Basic Knowledge = .83) and 2-week test-retest reliability (.87). In study 3 (N = 564), participant criteria (sexual orientation and education level) and four established scales that measured LGBT prejudice, assessment skills, and social desirability were used to support initial content and discriminant validity. Psychometric properties, limitations, and recommendations are discussed.
这三项研究为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者临床技能发展量表(LGBT-DOCSS)的开发、因子结构、信度和效度提供了初步证据,该量表是一种面向健康和心理健康服务提供者的新型跨学科LGBT临床自我评估工具。研究参与者是在美国和英国自愿招募的,包括应用心理学、咨询、心理治疗和初级保健医学领域的实习生、临床医生和教育工作者。研究1(N = 602)使用探索性和验证性因子分析技术,揭示了一个由18个项目组成的三因子结构(临床准备、态度意识和基础知识)。研究2确定了LGBT-DOCSS总量表(α = .86)以及三个子量表(临床准备 = .88、态度意识 = .80、基础知识 = .83)的内部一致性和2周重测信度(.87)。在研究3(N = 564)中,使用参与者标准(性取向和教育水平)以及四个已确立的量表(测量LGBT偏见、评估技能和社会期望)来支持初始内容效度和区分效度。文中讨论了心理测量特性、局限性和建议。