Jenkins R Gisli, Moore Bethany B, Chambers Rachel C, Eickelberg Oliver, Königshoff Melanie, Kolb Martin, Laurent Geoffrey J, Nanthakumar Carmel B, Olman Mitchell A, Pardo Annie, Selman Moises, Sheppard Dean, Sime Patricia J, Tager Andrew M, Tatler Amanda L, Thannickal Victor J, White Eric S
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017 May;56(5):667-679. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0096ST.
Numerous compounds have shown efficacy in limiting development of pulmonary fibrosis using animal models, yet few of these compounds have replicated these beneficial effects in clinical trials. Given the challenges associated with performing clinical trials in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), it is imperative that preclinical data packages be robust in their analyses and interpretations to have the best chance of selecting promising drug candidates to advance to clinical trials. The American Thoracic Society has convened a group of experts in lung fibrosis to discuss and formalize recommendations for preclinical assessment of antifibrotic compounds. The panel considered three major themes (choice of animal, practical considerations of fibrosis modeling, and fibrotic endpoints for evaluation). Recognizing the need for practical considerations, we have taken a pragmatic approach. The consensus view is that use of the murine intratracheal bleomycin model in animals of both genders, using hydroxyproline measurements for collagen accumulation along with histologic assessments, is the best-characterized animal model available for preclinical testing. Testing of antifibrotic compounds in this model is recommended to occur after the acute inflammatory phase has subsided (generally after Day 7). Robust analyses may also include confirmatory studies in human IPF specimens and validation of results in a second system using in vivo or in vitro approaches. The panel also strongly encourages the publication of negative results to inform the lung fibrosis community. These recommendations are for preclinical therapeutic evaluation only and are not intended to dissuade development of emerging technologies to better understand IPF pathogenesis.
许多化合物在使用动物模型限制肺纤维化发展方面已显示出疗效,但这些化合物中很少有在临床试验中重现这些有益效果的。鉴于在特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者中进行临床试验存在的挑战,临床前数据包在分析和解释方面必须强大有力,以便有最大机会选择有前景的候选药物推进到临床试验。美国胸科学会召集了一组肺纤维化专家,讨论并正式确定抗纤维化化合物临床前评估的建议。该小组考虑了三个主要主题(动物的选择、纤维化建模的实际考虑因素以及用于评估的纤维化终点)。认识到实际考虑的必要性,我们采取了务实的方法。共识观点是,在雄性和雌性动物中使用小鼠气管内博来霉素模型,使用羟脯氨酸测量来评估胶原蛋白积累并结合组织学评估,是可用于临床前测试的特征最明确的动物模型。建议在急性炎症期消退后(通常在第7天之后)在该模型中测试抗纤维化化合物。强有力的分析还可能包括在人类IPF标本中的验证研究以及使用体内或体外方法在第二个系统中验证结果。该小组还强烈鼓励发表阴性结果,以便为肺纤维化领域提供信息。这些建议仅用于临床前治疗评估,并非旨在劝阻开发新兴技术以更好地了解IPF发病机制。