• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导致死亡和脑损伤的情境意识错误的频率及类型:一项索赔结案分析。

Frequency and Type of Situational Awareness Errors Contributing to Death and Brain Damage: A Closed Claims Analysis.

作者信息

Schulz Christian M, Burden Amanda, Posner Karen L, Mincer Shawn L, Steadman Randolph, Wagner Klaus J, Domino Karen B

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany (C.M.S., K.J.W.); Department of Anesthesiology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey (A.B.); Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (K.L.P., S.L.M., K.B.D.); and Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Health System, Los Angeles, California (R.S.).

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2017 Aug;127(2):326-337. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001661.

DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001661
PMID:28459735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6237430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Situational awareness errors may play an important role in the genesis of patient harm. The authors examined closed anesthesia malpractice claims for death or brain damage to determine the frequency and type of situational awareness errors.

METHODS

Surgical and procedural anesthesia death and brain damage claims in the Anesthesia Closed Claims Project database were analyzed. Situational awareness error was defined as failure to perceive relevant clinical information, failure to comprehend the meaning of available information, or failure to project, anticipate, or plan. Patient and case characteristics, primary damaging events, and anesthesia payments in claims with situational awareness errors were compared to other death and brain damage claims from 2002 to 2013.

RESULTS

Anesthesiologist situational awareness errors contributed to death or brain damage in 198 of 266 claims (74%). Respiratory system damaging events were more common in claims with situational awareness errors (56%) than other claims (21%, P < 0.001). The most common specific respiratory events in error claims were inadequate oxygenation or ventilation (24%), difficult intubation (11%), and aspiration (10%). Payments were made in 85% of situational awareness error claims compared to 46% in other claims (P = 0.001), with no significant difference in payment size. Among 198 claims with anesthesia situational awareness error, perception errors were most common (42%), whereas comprehension errors (29%) and projection errors (29%) were relatively less common.

CONCLUSIONS

Situational awareness error definitions were operationalized for reliable application to real-world anesthesia cases. Situational awareness errors may have contributed to catastrophic outcomes in three quarters of recent anesthesia malpractice claims.Situational awareness errors resulting in death or brain damage remain prevalent causes of malpractice claims in the 21st century.

摘要

背景

情境意识失误可能在患者伤害的发生中起重要作用。作者检查了因死亡或脑损伤而提出的麻醉医疗事故索赔,以确定情境意识失误的频率和类型。

方法

分析了麻醉封闭索赔项目数据库中的手术和程序性麻醉死亡及脑损伤索赔。情境意识失误被定义为未能察觉相关临床信息、未能理解现有信息的含义或未能进行预测、预期或规划。将存在情境意识失误的索赔中的患者和病例特征、主要损害事件以及麻醉赔付与2002年至2013年的其他死亡和脑损伤索赔进行比较。

结果

在266项索赔中的198项(74%)中,麻醉医生的情境意识失误导致了死亡或脑损伤。与其他索赔(21%,P<0.001)相比,存在情境意识失误的索赔中呼吸系统损害事件更为常见(56%)。失误索赔中最常见的具体呼吸事件是氧合或通气不足(24%)、插管困难(11%)和误吸(10%)。85%的情境意识失误索赔获得了赔付,而其他索赔的赔付比例为46%(P=0.001),赔付金额无显著差异。在198项存在麻醉情境意识失误的索赔中,感知失误最为常见(42%),而理解失误(29%)和预测失误(29%)相对较少见。

结论

情境意识失误的定义得以实施,以便可靠地应用于实际的麻醉病例。情境意识失误可能在近期四分之三的麻醉医疗事故索赔中导致了灾难性后果。导致死亡或脑损伤的情境意识失误在21世纪仍然是医疗事故索赔的常见原因。

相似文献

1
Frequency and Type of Situational Awareness Errors Contributing to Death and Brain Damage: A Closed Claims Analysis.导致死亡和脑损伤的情境意识错误的频率及类型:一项索赔结案分析。
Anesthesiology. 2017 Aug;127(2):326-337. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001661.
2
Trends in anesthesia-related death and brain damage: A closed claims analysis.麻醉相关死亡和脑损伤的趋势:一项索赔分析。
Anesthesiology. 2006 Dec;105(6):1081-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200612000-00007.
3
What Adverse Events and Injuries Are Cited in Anesthesia Malpractice Claims for Nonspine Orthopaedic Surgery?非脊柱骨科手术麻醉医疗事故索赔中提到了哪些不良事件和损伤?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2941-2951. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5303-z.
4
Patient injuries from anesthesia gas delivery equipment: a closed claims update.麻醉气体输送设备致患者损伤:封闭索赔更新。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Oct;119(4):788-95. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10b5e.
5
A comparison of pediatric and adult anesthesia closed malpractice claims.儿科与成人麻醉闭合式医疗事故索赔的比较。
Anesthesiology. 1993 Mar;78(3):461-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199303000-00009.
6
Analysis of adverse outcomes in the post-anesthesia care unit based on anesthesia liability data.基于麻醉责任数据的麻醉后监护病房不良结局分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.038. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
7
Safety of Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: A Closed Claims Update.非手术室麻醉的安全性:闭合性索赔最新情况
Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Dec;35(4):569-581. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2017.07.003.
8
A contemporary medicolegal claims analysis of injuries related to neuraxial anesthesia between 2007 and 2016.2007 年至 2016 年与椎管内麻醉相关的伤害的当代法医学索赔分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Injuries associated with regional anesthesia in the 1980s and 1990s: a closed claims analysis.20世纪80年代和90年代与区域麻醉相关的损伤:一项索赔结案分析。
Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):143-52. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00023.
10
Preventable Closed Claims in the AANA Foundation Closed Malpractice Claims Database.美国麻醉护士协会基金会已结案医疗事故索赔数据库中的可预防已结案索赔
AANA J. 2019 Dec;87(6):468-476.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting Awareness of Dynamic Data: Approaches to Designing and Capturing Data within Interactive Clinical Checklists.支持对动态数据的认知:交互式临床检查表中数据的设计与获取方法
DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf). 2023 Jul;2023:1293-1308. doi: 10.1145/3563657.3595979. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Hyperangulated videolaryngoscope for difficult airway management: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.用于困难气道管理的超角度视频喉镜:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 23;15(6):e098508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098508.
3
Artificial intelligence for difficult airway assessment: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis.用于困难气道评估的人工智能:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 10;15(6):e096744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096744.
4
The future of sound in patient monitoring: a call to action to embrace the evidence and move forward.患者监测中声音技术的未来:呼吁积极接纳相关证据并向前迈进。
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;134(6):1616-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.03.012. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
5
CT based 3D radiomic and clinical airway examination model for evaluating mask ventilation in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients.基于CT的三维放射组学和临床气道检查模型,用于评估口腔颌面外科患者的面罩通气情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 15;15(1):5665. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90075-3.
6
Avatar-based versus conventional patient monitoring with distant vision: a computer-based simulation study.基于虚拟化身与传统远程视觉患者监测:一项基于计算机的模拟研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Nov 15. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01239-x.
7
Survey-based qualitative exploration of user perspectives on the philips visual patient avatar in clinical situation management.基于调查的对用户在临床情况管理中对飞利浦可视患者化身看法的定性探索。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72338-7.
8
Identifying intraoperative events in a simulated laparotomy video: a multinational study of inattentional blindness among anesthesiologists.在模拟腹腔镜视频中识别手术室内事件:麻醉师注意盲的跨国研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;71(9):1229-1237. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02788-0. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
9
Qualitative Exploration of Anesthesia Providers' Perceptions Regarding Philips Visual Patient Avatar in Clinical Practice.麻醉医护人员对飞利浦可视化患者虚拟形象在临床实践中认知的定性探索
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;11(4):323. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040323.
10
Use of artificial intelligence in critical care: opportunities and obstacles.人工智能在重症监护中的应用:机遇与挑战。
Crit Care. 2024 Apr 8;28(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04860-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Situation awareness errors in anesthesia and critical care in 200 cases of a critical incident reporting system.200例危急事件报告系统中麻醉与重症监护的情境意识错误
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Jan 16;16:4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0172-7.
2
The non-technical skills used by anaesthetic technicians in critical incidents reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring System between 2002 and 2008.2002年至2008年期间,麻醉技术人员在向澳大利亚事件监测系统报告的危急事件中所使用的非技术技能。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Jul;43(4):512-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300416.
3
Decision-making and cognitive strategies.决策与认知策略
Simul Healthc. 2015 Jun;10(3):133-8. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000093.
4
Massive hemorrhage: a report from the anesthesia closed claims project.大出血:麻醉闭合性索赔项目报告
Anesthesiology. 2014 Sep;121(3):450-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000369.
5
Situation Awareness and Interruption Handling During Medication Administration.给药过程中的情境意识与干扰处理
West J Nurs Res. 2014 Aug;36(7):891-916. doi: 10.1177/0193945914533426. Epub 2014 May 12.
6
Nurse-surgeon object transfer: video analysis of communication and situation awareness in the operating theatre.护士-外科医生物品交接:手术室沟通与情境意识的视频分析
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Sep;51(9):1195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
7
Operating room fires: a closed claims analysis.手术室火灾:封闭索赔分析。
Anesthesiology. 2013 May;118(5):1133-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828afa7b.
8
Situation awareness in anesthesia: concept and research.麻醉中的情境意识:概念与研究。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Mar;118(3):729-42. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318280a40f.
9
Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care.探索初级保健中诊断错误的情境意识。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):30-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000310. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
10
Beyond monitoring: distributed situation awareness in anaesthesia.超越监测:麻醉中的分布式态势感知。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;105(1):83-90. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq137.