Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston General Hospital site, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;71(9):1229-1237. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02788-0. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
Medical errors may be occasionally explained by inattentional blindness (IB), i.e., failing to notice an event/object that is in plain sight. We aimed to determine whether age/experience, restfulness/fatigue, and previous exposure to simulation education may affect IB in the anesthetic/surgical setting.
In this multicentre/multinational study, a convenience sample of 280 anesthesiologists watched an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient undergoing laparotomy and (independently/anonymously) recorded the abnormalities they noticed. The video contained four expected/common abnormalities (hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxia, hypothermia) and two prominently displayed unexpected/rare events (patient's head movement, leaky central venous line). We analyzed the participants' ability to notice the expected/unexpected events (primary outcome) and the proportion of expected/unexpected events according to age group and prior exposure to simulation education (secondary outcomes).
Anesthesiologists across all ages noticed fewer unexpected/rare events than expected/common ones. Overall, younger anesthesiologists missed fewer common events than older participants did (P = 0.02). There was no consistent association between age and perception of unexpected/rare events (P = 0.28), although the youngest cohort (< 30 yr) outperformed the other age groups. Prior simulation education did not affect the proportion of misses for the unexpected/rare events but was associated with fewer misses for the expected/common events. Self-perceived restfulness did not impact perception of events.
Anesthesiologists noticed fewer unexpected/rare clinical events than expected/common ones in an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient, in keeping with IB. Prior simulation training was associated with an improved ability to notice anticipated/expected events, but did not reduce IB. Our findings may have implications for understanding medical mishaps, and efforts to improve situational awareness, especially in acute perioperative and critical care settings.
医疗差错偶尔可以用注意力疏忽(IB)来解释,即未能注意到明显存在的事件/物体。我们旨在确定年龄/经验、休息/疲劳以及之前是否接受过模拟教育是否会影响麻醉/手术环境中的 IB。
在这项多中心/多国研究中,280 名麻醉师观看了一段模拟创伤患者接受剖腹手术的注意力要求高的视频,并(独立地/匿名地)记录了他们注意到的异常情况。视频包含四个预期的/常见的异常(低血压、心动过速、缺氧、低体温)和两个突出显示的意外/罕见事件(患者头部移动、中央静脉泄漏)。我们分析了参与者注意到预期/意外事件的能力(主要结果)以及根据年龄组和之前接受模拟教育的情况,预期/意外事件的比例(次要结果)。
所有年龄段的麻醉师都注意到罕见/意外事件的次数少于预期/常见事件。总体而言,年轻的麻醉师比年长的参与者错过的常见事件更少(P=0.02)。年龄与对意外/罕见事件的感知之间没有一致的关联(P=0.28),尽管最年轻的队列(<30 岁)表现优于其他年龄组。之前的模拟教育并没有影响对意外/罕见事件的错过比例,但与对预期/常见事件的错过比例减少有关。自我感知的休息状态不会影响对事件的感知。
在观看模拟创伤患者的注意力要求高的视频时,麻醉师注意到的罕见/意外临床事件少于预期/常见事件,这符合 IB。之前的模拟培训与提高注意到预期/预期事件的能力有关,但不会减少 IB。我们的发现可能对理解医疗失误以及努力提高情境意识具有重要意义,尤其是在急性围手术期和重症监护环境中。