Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 638 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Algorithm-Based Clinical Decision Support (ABCDS) Oversight, Office of Vice Dean of Data Science, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Crit Care. 2024 Apr 8;28(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04860-z.
BACKGROUND: Perhaps nowhere else in the healthcare system than in the intensive care unit environment are the challenges to create useful models with direct time-critical clinical applications more relevant and the obstacles to achieving those goals more massive. Machine learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to define states and predict future events are commonplace activities of modern life. However, their penetration into acute care medicine has been slow, stuttering and uneven. Major obstacles to widespread effective application of AI approaches to the real-time care of the critically ill patient exist and need to be addressed. MAIN BODY: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) in acute and critical care environments support clinicians, not replace them at the bedside. As will be discussed in this review, the reasons are many and include the immaturity of AI-based systems to have situational awareness, the fundamental bias in many large databases that do not reflect the target population of patient being treated making fairness an important issue to address and technical barriers to the timely access to valid data and its display in a fashion useful for clinical workflow. The inherent "black-box" nature of many predictive algorithms and CDSS makes trustworthiness and acceptance by the medical community difficult. Logistically, collating and curating in real-time multidimensional data streams of various sources needed to inform the algorithms and ultimately display relevant clinical decisions support format that adapt to individual patient responses and signatures represent the efferent limb of these systems and is often ignored during initial validation efforts. Similarly, legal and commercial barriers to the access to many existing clinical databases limit studies to address fairness and generalizability of predictive models and management tools. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based CDSS are evolving and are here to stay. It is our obligation to be good shepherds of their use and further development.
背景:在医疗保健系统中,也许没有其他地方比重症监护病房环境更能体现出创建具有直接时间关键临床应用的有用模型所面临的挑战和实现这些目标的障碍如此巨大。基于机器学习的人工智能 (AI) 技术用于定义状态和预测未来事件,这是现代生活中常见的活动。然而,它们在急性护理医学中的渗透速度缓慢、不稳定且不均衡。广泛有效地将人工智能方法应用于危重病患者的实时护理存在重大障碍,需要加以解决。
正文:急性和重症监护环境中的临床决策支持系统 (CDSS) 支持临床医生,而不是在床边取代他们。正如本综述中所讨论的,原因有很多,包括基于人工智能的系统缺乏情境感知能力、许多大型数据库存在根本偏见,这些数据库不能反映正在接受治疗的患者人群,这使得公平性成为一个需要解决的重要问题,以及及时获取有效数据及其显示在对临床工作流程有用的格式方面存在技术障碍。许多预测算法和 CDSS 的固有“黑盒”性质使得它们难以获得医疗界的信任和接受。从逻辑上讲,整理和实时整理各种来源的多维数据流以告知算法,并最终以适应个体患者反应和特征的相关临床决策支持格式显示,这代表了这些系统的传出支,在最初的验证工作中往往被忽视。同样,对许多现有临床数据库的访问存在法律和商业障碍,限制了研究以解决预测模型和管理工具的公平性和通用性。
结论:基于人工智能的 CDSS 正在不断发展,并且将继续存在。我们有责任成为它们使用和进一步发展的好牧羊人。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-10-4
Autism Adulthood. 2024-12-2
Comput Biol Med. 2024-9
Front Public Health. 2025-8-1
Crit Care Explor. 2025-5-27
NPJ Digit Med. 2024-1-23
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023-9
JAMA Netw Open. 2023-8-1
JAMA Netw Open. 2023-8-1
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023-6
Nature. 2023-3-30