Frenken Koen
Innovation Studies, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017 Jun 13;375(2095). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0367.
The sudden rise of the sharing economy has sparked an intense public debate about its definition, its effects and its future regulation. Here, I attempt to provide analytical guidance by defining the sharing economy as the practice that consumers grant each other temporary access to their under-utilized physical assets. Using this definition, the rise of the sharing economy can be understood as occurring at the intersection of three salient economic trends: peer-to-peer exchange, access over ownership and circular business models. I shortly discuss some of the environmental impacts of online sharing platforms and then articulate three possible futures of the sharing economy: a capitalist future cumulating in monopolistic super-platforms allowing for seamless services, a state-led future that shifts taxation from labour to capital and redistributes the gains of sharing from winners to losers, and a citizen-led future based on cooperatively owned platforms under democratic control. The nature and size of the social and environmental impacts are expected to differ greatly in each of the three scenarios.This article is part of the themed issue 'Material demand reduction'.
共享经济的突然兴起引发了公众对其定义、影响及未来监管的激烈辩论。在此,我试图通过将共享经济定义为消费者相互给予临时使用其未充分利用的有形资产的行为,来提供分析指导。基于这一定义,共享经济的兴起可被理解为发生在三个显著经济趋势的交叉点上:点对点交换、使用权优于所有权以及循环商业模式。我简要讨论了在线共享平台的一些环境影响,然后阐述了共享经济的三种可能未来:一种是资本主义未来,最终形成垄断性超级平台,提供无缝服务;一种是国家主导的未来,将税收从劳动力转向资本,并将共享收益从赢家重新分配给输家;还有一种是公民主导的未来,基于民主控制下的合作所有平台。预计这三种情景下社会和环境影响的性质及规模会有很大差异。本文是主题为“减少物质需求”的特刊的一部分。