Esfahrood Zeinab Rezaei, Ahmadi Loghman, Karami Elahe, Asghari Shima
Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;43(2):70-76. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.2.70. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
The purpose of this study was to perform a literature review of short implants in the posterior maxilla and to assess the influence of different factors on implant success rate. A comprehensive search was conducted to retrieve articles published from 2004 to 2015 using short dental implants with lengths less than 10 mm in the posterior maxilla with at least one year of follow-up. Twenty-four of 253 papers were selected, reviewed, and produced the following results. (1) The initial survival rate of short implants in the posterior maxilla was not related to implant width, surface, or design; however, the cumulative success rate of rough-surface short implants was higher than that of machined-surface implants especially in performance of edentulous dental implants of length <7 mm. (2) While bone augmentation can be used for rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla, short dental implants may be an alternative approach with fewer biological complications. (3) The increased crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio and occlusal table (OT) values in short dental implants with favorable occlusal loading do not seem to cause peri-implant bone loss. Higher C/I ratio does not produce any negative influence on implant success. (4) Some approaches that decrease the stress in posterior short implants use an implant designed to increase bone-implant contact surface area, providing the patient with a mutually protected or canine guidance occlusion and splinting implants together with no cantilever load. The survival rate of short implants in the posterior edentulous maxilla is high, and applying short implants under strict clinical protocols seems to be a safe and predictable technique.
本研究的目的是对后上颌骨短种植体进行文献综述,并评估不同因素对种植体成功率的影响。进行了全面检索,以获取2004年至2015年发表的文章,这些文章使用的是后上颌骨长度小于10mm的短牙种植体,且随访时间至少为一年。从253篇论文中筛选出24篇进行综述,结果如下:(1)后上颌骨短种植体的初始存活率与种植体宽度、表面或设计无关;然而,粗糙表面短种植体的累积成功率高于机械加工表面种植体,尤其是在长度<7mm的无牙颌种植体的表现方面。(2)虽然骨增量可用于萎缩性后上颌骨的修复,但短牙种植体可能是一种生物并发症较少的替代方法。(3)具有良好咬合负荷的短牙种植体中,冠种植体(C/I)比和咬合面(OT)值的增加似乎不会导致种植体周围骨质流失。较高的C/I比不会对种植体成功产生任何负面影响。(4)一些降低后牙短种植体应力的方法包括使用一种设计用于增加骨-种植体接触表面积的种植体,为患者提供相互保护或尖牙引导咬合,并将种植体夹板固定在一起,且无悬臂负荷。后牙无牙颌短种植体的存活率很高,在严格的临床方案下应用短种植体似乎是一种安全且可预测的技术。