Schincaglia Gian Pietro, Thoma Daniel S, Haas Robert, Tutak Marcin, Garcia Abel, Taylor Thomas D, Hämmerle Christoph H F
School of Dentistry Universita' di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Nov;42(11):1042-51. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12465. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
To compare, clinically and radiographically, short dental implants (6 mm) to long implants (11-15 mm) placed with sinus grafting.
Participants with 5-7 mm of bone height in the posterior maxilla were randomly allocated to receive short implants (GS) or long implants with sinus grafting (GG). Implants were loaded with single crowns 6 months after placement (PR). Patients were re-evaluated 12 months after loading (FU-1). Outcome variables included: Implant survival rate (CSR), marginal bone level alteration (MBL), periodontal probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque control record (PCR) and crown-to-implant ratios (C/I). Statistical analysis was performed using parametric tests.
In 97 subjects, 132 implants were re-evaluated at FU-1. The CSR was 100%. The MBL from implant placement (IP) to (PR) was -0.22 ± 0.4 mm for GG and -0.3 ± 0.45 mm for GS (p < 0.001). MBL from IP to FU-1 was -0.37 ± 0.59 mm for GG and -0.22 ± 0.3 mm for GS (p < 0.001). Intergroup comparisons showed non-significant differences for MBL (p > 0.05), PPD (p = 1) and PCR (p = 0.09). BoP was higher in the GS (p = 0.04). The C/I was 0.99 ± 0.17 for GG and 1.86 ± 0.23 for GS (p < 0.001). No correlation was observed between C/I and MBL, (GG: p = 0.13; GS: p = 0.38).
Both treatment modalities provided similar outcomes.
在临床和影像学方面,比较短种植体(6毫米)与采用上颌窦植骨的长种植体(11 - 15毫米)。
上颌后牙区骨高度为5 - 7毫米的参与者被随机分配接受短种植体(GS)或采用上颌窦植骨的长种植体(GG)。种植体植入6个月后安装单冠(PR)。在加载后12个月对患者进行重新评估(FU - 1)。结果变量包括:种植体存留率(CSR)、边缘骨水平改变(MBL)、牙周探诊深度(PPD)、探诊出血(BoP)、菌斑控制记录(PCR)以及冠种植体比率(C/I)。使用参数检验进行统计分析。
97名受试者中,132颗种植体在FU - 1时进行了重新评估。种植体存留率为100%。从种植体植入(IP)到(PR),GG组的MBL为 - 0.22±0.4毫米,GS组为 - 0.3±0.45毫米(p < 0.001)。从IP到FU - 1,GG组的MBL为 - 0.37±0.59毫米,GS组为 - 0.22±0.3毫米(p < 0.001)。组间比较显示,MBL(p > 0.05)、PPD(p = 1)和PCR(p = 0.09)无显著差异。GS组的BoP更高(p = 0.04)。GG组的C/I为0.99±0.17,GS组为1.86±0.23(p < 0.001)。未观察到C/I与MBL之间存在相关性(GG组:p = 0.13;GS组:p = 0.38)。
两种治疗方式的效果相似。