• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短种植体与间接上颌窦提升术对比标准长度种植体直接上颌窦提升术:病例报告

Short Implants and Indirect Sinus Lift Versus Direct Sinus Lift With Standard-Length Implants: A Case Report.

作者信息

Changrani Rachel, Patankar Amod, Patankar Swapna A, Kulkarni Pranjali, Sharma Amisha

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.

Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 23;16(7):e65197. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65197. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.65197
PMID:39176339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340658/
Abstract

The choice of implant length in relation to the available bone quality and quantity and biting force is a critical factor in the success of implants and longevity of the prosthesis. Long implants have always been considered more desirable in this respect but in patients with advanced alveolar bone resorption, their placement is problematic due to the anatomic boundaries. This holds more true in relation to the posterior maxilla wherein the residual crestal bone height is usually compromised due to pneumatizing sinus floor. In this study, we have incorporated the use of short implants in conjunction with indirect sinus lift for cases with severely resorbed posterior maxillary edentulous regions to avoid direct sinus lift surgery and increase patient comfort. A 63-year-old patient had tooth 16 missing and wanted implant rehabilitation. The residual alveolar bone height was 3 mm. Short implant placement after indirect sinus lift was achieved with good primary stability. Prosthetic loading was performed after six months. One year follow-up showed no complaints or discomfort. In cases where the residual alveolar bone height of the edentulous space in the posterior maxilla was less than 4 mm, the use of indirect sinus lift with placement of short implants (height < 6 mm) proved to be advantageous over a direct sinus lift procedure with delayed placement of standard-length implants. This technique was less time-consuming, less surgically morbid, and more economical. The patient compliance was superior and no complaints were faced in a one-year follow-up period.

摘要

根据可用骨质量和数量以及咬合力来选择种植体长度是种植体成功及修复体长期使用的关键因素。在这方面,长种植体一直被认为更理想,但在牙槽骨严重吸收的患者中,由于解剖边界的限制,种植体的植入存在问题。这在与上颌后牙区相关的情况中更为明显,其中由于上颌窦底气化,剩余牙槽嵴顶骨高度通常会受到影响。在本研究中,对于上颌后牙区严重吸收的无牙区域病例,我们采用了短种植体结合间接上颌窦提升术,以避免直接上颌窦提升手术并提高患者舒适度。一名63岁患者缺失16号牙,希望进行种植修复。剩余牙槽骨高度为3毫米。间接上颌窦提升术后植入短种植体,获得了良好的初期稳定性。六个月后进行修复体加载。一年随访显示无任何不适主诉。在上颌后牙区无牙间隙剩余牙槽骨高度小于4毫米的病例中,使用间接上颌窦提升术并植入短种植体(高度<6毫米)被证明比直接上颌窦提升术并延迟植入标准长度种植体更具优势。该技术耗时更少、手术创伤更小且更经济。患者依从性更好,在一年随访期内未出现任何不适主诉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2a/11340658/719cd46f77b6/cureus-0016-00000065197-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2a/11340658/5778cf884d0f/cureus-0016-00000065197-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2a/11340658/15185d75e2d9/cureus-0016-00000065197-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2a/11340658/719cd46f77b6/cureus-0016-00000065197-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2a/11340658/5778cf884d0f/cureus-0016-00000065197-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2a/11340658/15185d75e2d9/cureus-0016-00000065197-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2a/11340658/719cd46f77b6/cureus-0016-00000065197-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Short Implants and Indirect Sinus Lift Versus Direct Sinus Lift With Standard-Length Implants: A Case Report.短种植体与间接上颌窦提升术对比标准长度种植体直接上颌窦提升术:病例报告
Cureus. 2024 Jul 23;16(7):e65197. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65197. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus.缺失牙修复干预措施:上颌窦增量手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;2014(5):CD008397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008397.pub2.
3
Direct maxillary sinus floor augmentation and simultaneous implant placement for rehabilitation of the severely resorbed posterior maxilla: A prospective clinical study.直接上颌窦底提升同期种植修复严重吸收的上颌后牙区:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2020 May-Jun;31(3):449-456. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_848_18.
4
Guided implant surgery and sinus lift in severely resorbed maxillae: A retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.引导性种植手术与上颌窦提升同期进行在严重萎缩上颌骨中的应用:一项长达 10 年随访的回顾性临床研究。
J Dent. 2022 Jun;121:104137. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104137. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
5
Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomised controlled clinical trial.萎缩性上颌后牙区种植体的早期加载:自体骨联合Bio-Oss行外侧上颌窦提升术与嵴顶微创上颌窦提升术及8毫米羟基磷灰石涂层种植体的比较。一项随机对照临床试验。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Spring;2(1):25-38.
6
Implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla with sinus elevation without bone grafting: a 2-year prospective study.无骨移植情况下经窦提升行上颌后牙区萎缩牙槽嵴种植体植入:一项为期 2 年的前瞻性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):526-30. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2249.
7
Short and Ultra-Short Implants, in Association with Simultaneous Internal Sinus Lift in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.短种植体和超短种植体联合上颌后牙区萎缩性骨增量同期内提升术:一项五年回顾性研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 12;15(22):7995. doi: 10.3390/ma15227995.
8
Insufficient evidence for sinus lifts over short implants for dental implant rehabilitation.在牙种植修复中,关于上颌窦提升术对比短种植体的证据不足。
Evid Based Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):21-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401081.
9
Sinus elevation with an alloplastic material and simultaneous implant placement: a 1-stage procedure in severely atrophic maxillae.使用异体材料进行上颌窦提升并同期植入种植体:严重萎缩上颌骨的一期手术
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014 Sep;13(3):271-80. doi: 10.1007/s12663-013-0536-1. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
10
Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.上颌窦提升术用于牙种植修复的有效性:一项Cochrane系统评价
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):7-26.

引用本文的文献

1
A network meta-analysis comparing treatment modalities of short and long implants in the posterior maxilla with insufficient bone height.一项网络荟萃分析,比较上颌骨后部骨高度不足时短种植体与长种植体的治疗方式。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 31;24(1):1574. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05377-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Short implants (≤6mm) as an alternative treatment option to maxillary sinus lift.短种植体(≤6mm)作为上颌窦提升的替代治疗选择。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Nov;50(11):1502-1510. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
2
Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (≥10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.短种植体(5-8 毫米)与长种植体(≥10 毫米)在萎缩性后颌骨中的应用:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Dec;46(12):1192-1203. doi: 10.1111/joor.12860.
3
Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study.
后牙区上颌骨短种植体以避免上颌窦提升术:一项回顾性队列研究的5年结果
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Jan 22;5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0155-1.
4
Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta-analysis.短种植体与上颌窦提升后较长种植体的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e86. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0086. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
5
Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature.上颌后牙区的短种植体:文献综述
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;43(2):70-76. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.2.70. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
6
Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry.短种植体:种植牙科学的新视野。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Sep;10(9):ZE14-ZE17. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21838.8550. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) Versus Longer Implants (>8 mm) with Sinus Lifting in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs.萎缩性上颌后牙区短种植体(5至8毫米)与长种植体(>8毫米)同期上颌窦提升术的随机对照试验的Meta分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):207-215. doi: 10.1111/cid.12432. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
8
EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review.欧洲口腔种植学会补充工作组4 - 欧洲口腔种植学会2015年临床共识:短种植体与长种植体上颌窦提升术用于修复上颌后牙区:一项系统评价
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 11:154-69. doi: 10.1111/clr.12615. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
The sinus lift graft: basic technique and variations.上颌窦提升植骨术:基本技术与变体
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1997 Oct;9(8):885-93; quiz 895.
10
A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique.上颌种植手术的新概念:骨凿技术。
Compendium. 1994 Feb;15(2):152, 154-6, 158 passim; quiz 162.