• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSA 重建核是否会影响颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学预测?对几何形状和血流变化的分析。

Does the DSA reconstruction kernel affect hemodynamic predictions in intracranial aneurysms? An analysis of geometry and blood flow variations.

机构信息

Department of Fluid Dynamics and Technical Flows, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Department of Simulation and Graphics, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Mar;10(3):290-296. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-012996. Epub 2017 May 2.

DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-012996
PMID:28465404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) blood flow predictions in intracranial aneurysms promise great potential to reveal patient-specific flow structures. Since the workflow from image acquisition to the final result includes various processing steps, quantifications of the individual introduced potential error sources are required.

METHODS

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the acquired imaging data as input to 3D model generation was evaluated. Six different reconstruction modes for 3D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) acquisitions were applied to eight patient-specific aneurysms. Segmentations were extracted to compare the 3D luminal surfaces. Time-dependent CFD simulations were carried out in all 48 configurations to assess the velocity and wall shear stress (WSS) variability due to the choice of reconstruction kernel.

RESULTS

All kernels yielded good segmentation agreement in the parent artery; deviations of the luminal surface were present at the aneurysm neck (up to 34.18%) and in distal or perforating arteries. Observations included pseudostenoses as well as noisy surfaces, depending on the selected reconstruction kernel. Consequently, the hemodynamic predictions show a mean SD of 11.09% for the aneurysm neck inflow rate, 5.07% for the centerline-based velocity magnitude, and 17.83%/9.53% for the mean/max aneurysmal WSS, respectively. In particular, vessel sections distal to the aneurysms yielded stronger variations of the CFD values.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of reconstruction kernel for DSA data influences the segmentation result, especially for small arteries. Therefore, if precise morphology measurements or blood flow descriptions are desired, a specific reconstruction setting is required. Furthermore, research groups should be encouraged to denominate the kernel types used in future hemodynamic studies.

摘要

背景

颅内动脉瘤的计算流体动力学(CFD)血流预测具有揭示患者特定血流结构的巨大潜力。由于从图像采集到最终结果的工作流程包括各种处理步骤,因此需要对各个引入的潜在误差源进行量化。

方法

评估了作为 3D 模型生成输入的采集成像数据的 3D 重建。将六种不同的 3D 数字减影血管造影(DSA)采集重建模式应用于八个患者特定的动脉瘤。提取分割以比较 3D 管腔表面。对所有 48 种配置进行了时变 CFD 模拟,以评估由于重建核选择引起的速度和壁面剪切应力(WSS)变化。

结果

所有内核在母动脉中均产生良好的分割一致性;在动脉瘤颈部(最高可达 34.18%)和远端或穿透动脉处存在管腔表面的偏差。观察结果包括根据所选重建内核出现的假性狭窄和嘈杂表面。因此,血流动力学预测显示,动脉瘤颈部流入率的平均值标准偏差为 11.09%,基于中心线的速度幅度的平均值标准偏差为 5.07%,平均/最大动脉瘤 WSS 的平均值标准偏差分别为 17.83%/9.53%。特别是,动脉瘤远端的血管段产生了更强的 CFD 值变化。

结论

DSA 数据的重建内核选择会影响分割结果,特别是对于小动脉。因此,如果需要精确的形态测量或血流描述,则需要特定的重建设置。此外,应鼓励研究小组在未来的血流动力学研究中注明所用内核类型。

相似文献

1
Does the DSA reconstruction kernel affect hemodynamic predictions in intracranial aneurysms? An analysis of geometry and blood flow variations.DSA 重建核是否会影响颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学预测?对几何形状和血流变化的分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Mar;10(3):290-296. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-012996. Epub 2017 May 2.
2
Critical role of angiographic acquisition modality and reconstruction on morphometric and haemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms.血管造影采集方式和重建对颅内动脉瘤形态和血流动力学分析的关键作用。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Sep;10(9):911-915. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013677. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
3
Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of 4D-DSA with 3D-DSA Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations in Cerebral Aneurysms.基于计算流体动力学模拟的脑动脉瘤 4D-DSA 与 3D-DSA 的定量与定性比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Sep;40(9):1505-1510. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6172.
4
Real-World Variability in the Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Shear Stress: The 2015 International Aneurysm CFD Challenge.颅内动脉瘤壁面剪应力预测的真实世界变异性:2015年国际动脉瘤计算流体动力学挑战赛
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2018 Dec;9(4):544-564. doi: 10.1007/s13239-018-00374-2. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
Hemodynamic Effect of Flow Diverter and Coils in Treatment of Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms.血流导向装置和弹簧圈治疗大型及巨大型颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学效应
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.079. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics.颅内动脉瘤的计算流体动力学建模:母动脉分割对瘤内血流动力学的影响
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Sep;27(8):1703-9.
7
Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.使用机器学习对颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的结果预测。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E7. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18332.
8
Influence of hemodynamics on recanalization of totally occluded intracranial aneurysms: a patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation study.血流动力学对完全闭塞颅内动脉瘤再通的影响:一项基于患者个体的计算流体动力学模拟研究。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Aug;117(2):276-83. doi: 10.3171/2012.5.JNS111558. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
9
A multidimensional pre-operative planning method of unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms using three-dimensional AWE mapping and hemodynamic simulation.基于三维 AWE 图谱和血流动力学模拟的未破裂椎动脉夹层动脉瘤多维术前规划方法。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Aug;243:108398. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108398. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
10
Magnetic resonance fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms--comparison with computed fluid dynamics.颅内动脉瘤的磁共振流体动力学——与计算流体动力学的比较。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Jun;154(6):993-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1305-5. Epub 2012 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive modeling and machine learning show poor performance of clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic parameters for small intracranial aneurysm rupture.预测建模和机器学习表明,临床、形态学和血流动力学参数对小型颅内动脉瘤破裂的预测效果不佳。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 5;15(1):24051. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08478-1.
2
Optimizing Image Quality in Cerebral 3D Rotational Angiography: A Study on the Impact of Voxel Size.优化脑三维旋转血管造影的图像质量:体素大小影响的研究
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 3;46(6):1173-1179. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8672.
3
Multimodal exploration of the intracranial aneurysm wall.
颅内动脉瘤壁的多模态研究。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023 Dec;18(12):2243-2252. doi: 10.1007/s11548-023-02850-0. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
4
Aneurysm Neck Overestimation has a Relatively Modest Impact on Simulated Hemodynamics.瘤颈高估对模拟血流动力学的影响相对较小。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2023 Apr;14(2):252-263. doi: 10.1007/s13239-022-00652-0. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
5
Geometric uncertainty in intracranial aneurysm rupture status discrimination: a two-site retrospective study.颅内动脉瘤破裂状态判别中的几何不确定性:一项两地回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):e063051. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063051.
6
Aneurysm Wall Enhancement Is Associated With Decreased Intrasaccular IL-10 and Morphological Features of Instability.动脉瘤壁强化与囊内 IL-10 减少和不稳定性的形态学特征有关。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Sep 15;89(4):664-671. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab249.
7
VICTORIA: VIrtual neck Curve and True Ostium Reconstruction of Intracranial Aneurysms.维多利亚:颅内动脉瘤的虚拟颈部曲线和真实口重建。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2021 Aug;12(4):454-465. doi: 10.1007/s13239-021-00535-w. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
8
Multimodal validation of focal enhancement in intracranial aneurysms as a surrogate marker for aneurysm instability.颅内动脉瘤局灶强化的多模态验证作为动脉瘤不稳定的替代标志物。
Neuroradiology. 2020 Dec;62(12):1627-1635. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02498-6. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.计算流体动力学能告诉我们关于颅内动脉瘤的什么信息?一项荟萃分析和批判性回顾。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020 May;40(5):1021-1039. doi: 10.1177/0271678X19854640. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)-Phase Ib: Effect of morphology on hemodynamics.2018 年多动脉瘤解剖挑战(MATCH)-Ib 期:形态对血液动力学的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 May 17;14(5):e0216813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216813. eCollection 2019.