• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转诊模式和治疗类型对导管原位癌女性肿瘤学结局的影响。

Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

作者信息

Wai Elaine S, Lesperance Mary, Lu Linghong, Alexander Cheryl S, Truong Pauline T

机构信息

Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency.

Statistics, University of Victoria.

出版信息

Cureus. 2017 Mar 31;9(3):e1128. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1128.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.1128
PMID:28465875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5409819/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. This study examined long-term outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with pure DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone, BCS + radiotherapy (RT), and mastectomy. Outcomes were compared between patients referred versus not referred for oncologic assessment after definitive surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects were 2575 women diagnosed between 1985 and 1999. Data from several electronic databases were linked and analyzed. Outcomes were invasive local recurrence-free survival (ILRFS), mastectomy-free survival (MFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 9.8 years. Overall, 56% (n = 1448) of subjects were referred to a cancer centre. Factors associated with non-referral were older age, comorbidities, and travel distance. Ten-year MFS, BCSS, and OS were higher among referred patients (all p ≤ 0.001). In cohorts treated with BCS alone (n = 1314) vs. BCS + RT (n = 510) vs. mastectomy (n = 751), 10-year ILRFS were 93.7% vs. 96.6% vs. 97.7%, (p < 0.001) and BCSS were 97.6% vs. 99.8% vs. 98.6%, (p = 0.01). Corresponding rates of ipsilateral invasive breast relapse at 10 years were 6.3% after BCS alone, 3.4% after BCS + RT, and 2.3% after mastectomy (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with improved ILRFS were older age at diagnosis, low comorbidity score, absence of comedo histology, mastectomy, and post-BCS RT.

CONCLUSION

Patients with DCIS referred for oncologic assessment were more likely to undergo post-BCS RT, resulting in lower mastectomy and higher survival rates compared to non-referred patients. Patients with significant comorbidities were less likely to be referred and experienced lower ILRFS and BCSS. Referral for multidisciplinary oncologic assessment after surgery is warranted to individualize management and optimize outcomes for patients with DCIS.

摘要

目的

导管原位癌(DCIS)的治疗仍存在争议。本研究调查了一组以人群为基础的单纯接受保乳手术(BCS)、BCS+放疗(RT)和乳房切除术的纯DCIS患者的长期预后。比较了确诊手术后转诊和未转诊接受肿瘤学评估的患者的预后。

材料与方法

研究对象为1985年至1999年间确诊的2575名女性。对来自多个电子数据库的数据进行了关联和分析。预后指标为无局部浸润性复发生存率(ILRFS)、无乳房切除生存率(MFS)、乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)和总生存率(OS)。

结果

中位随访时间为9.8年。总体而言,56%(n=1448)的研究对象被转诊至癌症中心。与未转诊相关的因素包括年龄较大、合并症和出行距离。转诊患者的10年MFS、BCSS和OS更高(所有p≤0.001)。在单纯接受BCS治疗的队列(n=1314)、BCS+RT治疗的队列(n=510)和乳房切除术治疗的队列(n=751)中,10年ILRFS分别为93.7%、96.6%和97.7%,(p<0.001),BCSS分别为97.6%、99.8%和98.6%,(p=0.01)。10年时同侧浸润性乳腺癌复发率在单纯BCS后为6.3%,BCS+RT后为3.4%,乳房切除术后为2.3%(p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,与ILRFS改善相关的因素包括诊断时年龄较大、合并症评分低、无粉刺样组织学、乳房切除术和BCS后放疗。

结论

转诊接受肿瘤学评估的DCIS患者更有可能接受BCS后放疗,与未转诊患者相比,乳房切除术率更低,生存率更高。合并症严重的患者被转诊的可能性较小,ILRFS和BCSS较低。手术后转诊进行多学科肿瘤学评估对于DCIS患者的个体化治疗和优化预后是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c85/5409819/9ae9e5874839/cureus-0009-00000001128-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c85/5409819/5a5058be9328/cureus-0009-00000001128-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c85/5409819/9ae9e5874839/cureus-0009-00000001128-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c85/5409819/5a5058be9328/cureus-0009-00000001128-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c85/5409819/9ae9e5874839/cureus-0009-00000001128-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.转诊模式和治疗类型对导管原位癌女性肿瘤学结局的影响。
Cureus. 2017 Mar 31;9(3):e1128. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1128.
2
Omitting radiation therapy after lumpectomy for pure DCIS does not reduce the risk of salvage mastectomy.保乳术后省略放疗治疗单纯 DCIS 并不能降低挽救性乳房切除术的风险。
Breast. 2018 Feb;37:181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
Local Relapse After Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Mastectomy for Extensive Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ≥4 cm.广泛纯导管原位癌≥4cm 行保乳治疗与乳房切除术的局部复发比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Feb 1;103(2):381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
4
Management of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Following Breast Conservation Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Data-Poor Zone.保乳手术后同侧乳腺导管原位癌复发的管理:数据匮乏区域。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):8843-8847. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16133-8. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
5
Multiple foci of microinvasion is associated with an increased risk of invasive local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery.多灶微浸润与保乳手术后导管原位癌女性浸润性局部复发风险增加相关。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Nov;178(1):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05364-z. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
6
Trade-offs between survival and breast preservation for three initial treatments of ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast.乳腺导管原位癌三种初始治疗方法在生存与保乳之间的权衡。
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jan;14(1):70-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.70.
7
8
Survival outcomes after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion.保乳手术联合放疗与乳房切除术治疗伴有微浸润的乳腺导管原位癌的生存结局比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 22;12(1):20132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24630-7.
9
Oncologic outcomes after breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy versus mastectomy in patients with Paget's disease of the breast: systematic review and meta-analysis.保乳手术联合放疗与乳房切除术治疗乳腺佩吉特病患者的肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析
Br J Surg. 2023 Oct 10;110(11):1451-1457. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad199.
10
Treating Second Breast Events After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.治疗导管原位癌保乳手术后的第二乳房事件。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Apr;16(4):387-394. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7003.

引用本文的文献

1
Saving normal tissues - a goal for the ages.保存正常组织——一个永恒的目标。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2019 Jul;95(7):920-935. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1589654. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.导管原位癌的治疗模式及预后趋势
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 30;107(12):djv263. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv263. Print 2015 Dec.
2
Surgical Excision Without Radiation for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: 12-Year Results From the ECOG-ACRIN E5194 Study.不进行放疗的手术切除治疗乳腺导管原位癌:ECOG-ACRIN E5194研究的12年结果
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 20;33(33):3938-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8588. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
3
Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
导管原位癌诊断后的乳腺癌死亡率。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):888-96. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2510.
4
A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone.一项基于人群的验证性研究,评估DCIS评分对仅接受保乳手术治疗的个体复发风险的预测作用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;152(2):389-98. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3464-6. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Post-operative radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.乳腺导管原位癌的术后放疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 21;2013(11):CD000563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000563.pub7.
6
Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma In Situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial.保乳治疗联合或不联合放疗治疗导管原位癌:来自 EORTC 10853 随机 III 期试验的 15 年复发率和复发后的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 10;31(32):4054-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.5077. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
7
Quality indicators for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: development using a multidisciplinary delphi process and its use in monitoring population-based treatment.乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)的质量指标:使用多学科 Delphi 流程开发及其在基于人群的治疗监测中的应用。
J Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;108(6):348-51. doi: 10.1002/jso.23401. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
8
Factors influencing the quality of local management of ductal carcinoma in situ: a cohort study.影响导管原位癌局部管理质量的因素:一项队列研究。
Curr Oncol. 2013 Jun;20(3):e212-22. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1293.
9
A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.一种多基因表达检测方法,用于预测乳腺导管原位癌的局部复发风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 May 15;105(10):701-10. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt067. Epub 2013 May 2.
10
Can we select individuals with low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)? A population-based outcomes analysis.能否筛选出低风险导管原位癌(DCIS)患者?基于人群的结局分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(2):581-90. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2455-8. Epub 2013 Mar 3.