• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全屋系统:医疗保健系统集成的新方向。

Whole System in the Room: Toward Systems Integration in Healthcare.

机构信息

a Department of Business Administration , Lund University School of Economics and Management.

b Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2018 Jul;33(7):800-808. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1314854. Epub 2017 May 3.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2017.1314854
PMID:28467191
Abstract

How might systems integration be furthered in healthcare? The paper addresses this by exploring critically the potentials of appreciative inquiry for accelerating systems integration through a large group intervention. We analyze a one-day dialog workshop to get "the whole system in the room" to improve cancer care in a regional health authority in south west Sweden. Seeing systems integration as socialization and enhanced common understandings, we suggest that discourse may play a crucial role in bringing together the various stakeholders in the system. Our analysis of the group discussions of the event demonstrates however that the degree of shared understanding can vary considerably across the discussion themes of appreciative inquiry. We argue that the "patient," as a linguistic artifact, can act as a boundary signifier that enables those present to interact in a meaningful and coherent way but that this stops short of systems integration.

摘要

在医疗保健领域,系统集成如何进一步发展?本文通过批判性地探讨欣赏式探询通过大规模群体干预加速系统集成的潜力来解决这个问题。我们分析了一个为期一天的对话研讨会,旨在让“整个系统都参与进来”,以改善瑞典西南部一个地区卫生局的癌症护理。我们将系统集成视为社会化和增强共同理解,因此我们认为话语可能在将系统中的各个利益相关者聚集在一起方面发挥关键作用。然而,我们对该事件的小组讨论的分析表明,在欣赏式探询的讨论主题中,共同理解的程度可能有很大差异。我们认为,“患者”作为一种语言符号,可以充当边界指示符,使在场的人能够以有意义和连贯的方式进行互动,但这并不能实现系统集成。

相似文献

1
Whole System in the Room: Toward Systems Integration in Healthcare.全屋系统:医疗保健系统集成的新方向。
Health Commun. 2018 Jul;33(7):800-808. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1314854. Epub 2017 May 3.
2
Using appreciative inquiry to bring neonatal nurses and parents together to enhance family-centred care: A collaborative workshop.运用积极探究法让新生儿护士与家长携手合作以加强以家庭为中心的护理:一次协作研讨会
J Child Health Care. 2015 Jun;19(2):239-53. doi: 10.1177/1367493513508059. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
3
How do stakeholders from multiple hierarchical levels of a large provincial health system define engagement? A qualitative study.多层面大型省级卫生系统的利益相关者如何定义参与?一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 1;12(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5.
4
Theoretical foundations guiding culture change: The work of the Partnerships in Dementia Care Alliance.指导文化变革的理论基础:痴呆症护理联盟中的伙伴关系工作。
Dementia (London). 2016 Jan;15(1):85-105. doi: 10.1177/1471301213518935. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
5
Implementing the 4D cycle of appreciative inquiry in health care: a methodological review.在医疗保健中实施欣赏式探询的 4D 循环:方法学回顾。
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jun;69(6):1224-34. doi: 10.1111/jan.12086. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
6
Implementing health and social care integration in Scotland: Renegotiating new partnerships in changing cultures of care.在苏格兰实施健康与社会护理整合:在不断变化的护理文化中重新协商新的伙伴关系。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):e396-e403. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12537. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
7
Clinical integration: one health-care system's experience.临床整合:一个医疗系统的经验。
Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1998 Sep-Oct;12(5):314-6.
8
Continuous innovation in health care: implications of the Geisinger experience.医疗保健的持续创新:基于 Geisinger 经验的启示。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):1235-45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1235.
9
Toward a collaborative care delivery model: the role of population health improvement organizations in the patient-centered medical home.迈向协作式医疗服务模式:人群健康改善组织在以患者为中心的医疗之家的作用。
Popul Health Manag. 2010 Oct;13(5):285-8. doi: 10.1089/pop.2010.1369.
10
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice.跨专业协作实践
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2016 Apr;47(4):156-7. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20160322-03.

引用本文的文献

1
Action researchers as "orchestrators" of co-innovation: a theoretical and methodological framework.行动研究者作为协同创新的“指挥者”:理论与方法框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 9;24(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10779-6.
2
User involvement and value co-creation in well-being ecosystems.用户参与和价值共创在幸福感生态系统中的作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2023 Sep 26;37(9):34-55. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2022-0339.
3
A framework to improve quality of hospital-based physiotherapy: a design-based research study.改善医院物理治疗质量的框架:基于设计的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 14;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09062-x.