• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用户参与和价值共创在幸福感生态系统中的作用。

User involvement and value co-creation in well-being ecosystems.

机构信息

Department of Business Studies, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.

The University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Health Organ Manag. 2023 Sep 26;37(9):34-55. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2022-0339.

DOI:10.1108/JHOM-11-2022-0339
PMID:37787111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10596431/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This article aims to examine how users' involvement in value co-creation influences the development and orchestration of well-being ecosystems to help tackle complex societal challenges. This research contributes to the public management literature and answers recent calls to investigate novel public service governances by discussing users' involvement and value co-creation for novel well-being solutions.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors empirically explore this phenomenon through a case study of a complex ecosystem addressing increased well-being, focussing on the formative evaluation stage of a longitudinal evaluation of Sweden's first support centre for people affected by cancer. Following an abductive reasoning and action research approach, the authors critically discuss the potential of user involvement for the development of well-being ecosystems and outline preconditions for the success of such approaches.

FINDINGS

The empirical results indicate that resource reconfiguration of multi-actor collaborations provides a platform for value co-creation, innovative health services and availability of resources. Common themes include the need for multi-actor collaborations to reconfigure heterogeneous resources; actors' adaptive change capabilities; the role of governance mechanisms to align the diverse well-being ecosystem components, and the engagement of essential actors.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Although using a longitudinal case study approach has revealed stimulating insights, additional data collection, multiple cases and quantitative studies are prompted. Also, the authors focus on one country but the characteristics of users' involvement for value co-creation in innovative well-being ecosystems might vary between countries.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate the value of cancer-affected individuals, with "lived experiences", acting as sources for social innovation, and drivers of well-being ecosystem development. The findings also suggest that participating actors in the ecosystem should utilise wider knowledge and experience to tackle complex societal challenges associated with well-being.

SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Policymakers should encourage the formation of well-being ecosystems with diverse actors and resources that can help patients navigate health challenges. The findings especially show the potential of starting from the user's needs and life situation when the ambition is to integrate and innovate in fragmented systems.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The proposed model proposes that having a user-led focus on innovating new solutions can play an important role in the development of well-being ecosystems.

摘要

目的

本文旨在探讨用户参与价值共创如何影响福祉生态系统的发展和协调,以帮助应对复杂的社会挑战。本研究通过讨论用户参与和价值共创对于新型福祉解决方案的作用,为公共管理文献做出贡献,并回应了最近关于新型公共服务治理的呼吁。

设计/方法/途径:通过对一个旨在提高福祉的复杂生态系统的案例研究,作者从实证角度探讨了这一现象,该案例重点关注瑞典首个癌症患者支持中心的纵向评估的形成性评估阶段。作者采用溯因推理和行动研究方法,批判性地讨论了用户参与对福祉生态系统发展的潜力,并概述了此类方法成功的前提条件。

发现

实证结果表明,多主体合作的资源重新配置为价值共创、创新型卫生服务和资源可用性提供了平台。共同主题包括多主体合作重新配置异质资源的必要性;参与者的适应性变革能力;治理机制在协调多样化福祉生态系统组成部分以及吸引必要参与者方面的作用。

研究局限性/影响:尽管使用纵向案例研究方法揭示了令人振奋的见解,但需要进一步的数据收集、多个案例和定量研究。此外,作者关注的是一个国家,但在创新型福祉生态系统中用户参与价值共创的特点可能因国家而异。

实际影响

本研究的发现表明,受癌症影响的个人具有“生活经验”,可以作为社会创新的源泉和福祉生态系统发展的驱动力。研究结果还表明,生态系统中的参与方应该利用更广泛的知识和经验来应对与福祉相关的复杂社会挑战。

社会影响

政策制定者应鼓励形成具有多样化参与者和资源的福祉生态系统,以帮助患者应对健康挑战。研究结果尤其表明,当目标是整合和创新碎片化系统时,从用户的需求和生活情况出发具有潜在的可能性。

原创性/价值:所提出的模型表明,以用户为导向的创新新解决方案的重点可以在福祉生态系统的发展中发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a82e/10596431/4b9d20d95a88/jhealthorganmanag-37-0034-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a82e/10596431/4b9d20d95a88/jhealthorganmanag-37-0034-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a82e/10596431/4b9d20d95a88/jhealthorganmanag-37-0034-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
User involvement and value co-creation in well-being ecosystems.用户参与和价值共创在幸福感生态系统中的作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2023 Sep 26;37(9):34-55. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2022-0339.
2
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Value co-creation in business-to-business context: A bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOS viewer.企业对企业背景下的价值共创:使用HistCite和VOSviewer的文献计量分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1027775. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027775. eCollection 2022.
5
Identification of required capabilities of digital health ecosystems when preventing and managing non-communicable diseases.预防和管理非传染性疾病时数字健康生态系统所需能力的识别。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 12;10:20552076241271807. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271807. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
SHAFE Mapping on Social Innovation Ecosystems.社会创新生态系统中的 SHAFE 映射。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010118.
7
The Involvement of Service Users and People With Lived Experience in Mental Health Care Innovation Through Design: Systematic Review.通过设计让服务使用者和有亲身经历者参与精神卫生保健创新:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Jul 25;10:e46590. doi: 10.2196/46590.
8
Orchestrating Multi-Agent Knowledge Ecosystems: The Role of Makerspaces.编排多智能体知识生态系统:创客空间的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 18;13:898134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.898134. eCollection 2022.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Enabling Value Co-Creation in Healthcare through Blockchain Technology.通过区块链技术实现医疗保健中的价值共创。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;20(1):67. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010067.

引用本文的文献

1
The ties that bind: innovation configurations in low- and middle-income healthcare delivery settings.束缚的纽带:中低收入医疗卫生服务环境下的创新配置。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 May 31;38(9):216-240. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2023-0275.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the meaning, role and experiences of a patient-led social innovation for people affected by cancer: a new collaborative care model complementing traditional cancer rehabilitation in Sweden.探索以患者为中心的社会创新对癌症患者的意义、作用和体验:一种新的协同护理模式,补充了瑞典传统的癌症康复。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Oct;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001400.
2
Brachytherapy-Based Radiotherapy and Radical Prostatectomy Are Associated With Similar Survival in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer.基于近距离放射治疗和根治性前列腺切除术的治疗与高危局限性前列腺癌的相似生存相关。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1192-1198. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9134. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
3
Whole System in the Room: Toward Systems Integration in Healthcare.
全屋系统:医疗保健系统集成的新方向。
Health Commun. 2018 Jul;33(7):800-808. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1314854. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
Interpersonal complaints regarding cancer care through a gender lens.从性别视角看关于癌症护理的人际投诉。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 Jul 11;29(6):687-702. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2014-0032.
5
Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.共同决策——以患者为中心的医疗的巅峰。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283.
6
Experiences of living with advanced colorectal cancer from two perspectives - inside and outside.从内外两个角度体验晚期结直肠癌的生活。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Dec;15(5):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
7
What 'patient-centered' should mean: confessions of an extremist.以患者为中心应该意味着什么:一个极端主义者的自白。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jul-Aug;28(4):w555-65. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w555. Epub 2009 May 19.
8
Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem.使你的创新战略与创新生态系统相匹配。
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Apr;84(4):98-107; 148.
9
Patient-centredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter?慢性病中的以患者为中心:它是什么,重要吗?
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Nov;51(3):197-206. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00194-5.