Suppr超能文献

拯救我的生命:治疗性社区居民中同伴与工作人员纠正的动态变化

Saving My Life: Dynamics of Peer and Staff Corrections Among Therapeutic Community Residents.

作者信息

Doogan Nathan J, Warren Keith L

机构信息

a College of Public Health , The Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio , USA.

b College of Social Work , The Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio , USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Sep 19;52(11):1429-1438. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1284236. Epub 2017 May 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic communities (TCs) maintain order and encourage behavior change through a system of peer corrections. This study is the first quantitative analysis of the dynamics of the exchange of peer corrections at TCs.

OBJECTIVES

We applied longitudinal social network analysis to compare the reactions of TC residents to peer versus staff intervention, while analyzing dynamics of correction exchange among residents.

METHOD

The data consisted of a large database of staff and peer affirmations and corrections at four therapeutic community units that occurred between the years 2006 and 2008. We modeled the data as a directed temporal social event network, using a generalized linear mixed effects model to analyze predictors of corrections among residents.

RESULTS

Residents were more likely to send a correction following peer affirmations and corrections than following staff affirmations and corrections. Residents reciprocated corrections to individual peers. Autocorrelation was evident in both sending and receiving corrections and residents were more likely to send a correction after having sent an affirmation. Residents who arrived at roughly the same time were more likely to exchange corrections. Residents tended to send and receive more corrections in the middle 3 months of their treatment. European American residents and those with higher scores on the LSI-R were more likely to receive corrections than others.

CONCLUSIONS

TC residents respond more strongly and more positively to peer than to staff intervention. The pattern of exchange of peer corrections in TCs is complex. This suggests possible paths to improved outcomes.

摘要

背景

治疗社区(TCs)通过同伴矫正系统维持秩序并鼓励行为改变。本研究是对治疗社区中同伴矫正交流动态的首次定量分析。

目的

我们应用纵向社会网络分析来比较治疗社区居民对同伴干预与工作人员干预的反应,同时分析居民之间矫正交流的动态。

方法

数据包括2006年至2008年间四个治疗社区单元中工作人员和同伴的肯定与矫正的大型数据库。我们将数据建模为有向时间社会事件网络,使用广义线性混合效应模型分析居民之间矫正的预测因素。

结果

与工作人员的肯定和矫正相比,居民在同伴的肯定和矫正之后更有可能进行矫正。居民会向个别同伴回报矫正。在发送和接收矫正方面,自相关都很明显,并且居民在发送肯定之后更有可能发送矫正。大致同时到达的居民更有可能进行矫正交流。居民在治疗的中间3个月倾向于发送和接收更多的矫正。与其他居民相比,欧美裔居民和在LSI-R上得分较高的居民更有可能收到矫正。

结论

治疗社区居民对同伴干预的反应比对工作人员干预的反应更强烈、更积极。治疗社区中同伴矫正的交流模式很复杂。这提示了可能改善治疗效果的途径。

相似文献

1
Saving My Life: Dynamics of Peer and Staff Corrections Among Therapeutic Community Residents.
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Sep 19;52(11):1429-1438. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1284236. Epub 2017 May 3.
3
Building the community: Endogenous network formation, homophily and prosocial sorting among therapeutic community residents.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Feb 1;207:107773. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107773. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
4
Short-Run Prosocial Behavior in Response to Receiving Corrections and Affirmations in Three Therapeutic Communities.
J Offender Rehabil. 2013 Jan 1;52(4):270-286. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2013.782776.
5
Difference in Response to Feedback and Gender in Three Therapeutic Community Units.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 30;12:690713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.690713. eCollection 2021.
6
Eigenvector centrality defines hierarchy and predicts graduation in therapeutic community units.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261405. eCollection 2021.
7
Evaluating peer-influence processes in a prison-based therapeutic community: a dynamic network approach.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Oct 1;203:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Resident interactions when affirming and correcting peers in a therapeutic community for women.
Ther Communities. 2021 Dec 2;42(4):137-148. doi: 10.1108/tc-03-2021-0007. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
9
Verbal feedback in therapeutic communities: pull-ups and reciprocated pull-ups as predictors of graduation.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Apr;44(4):361-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Resident interactions when affirming and correcting peers in a therapeutic community for women.
Ther Communities. 2021 Dec 2;42(4):137-148. doi: 10.1108/tc-03-2021-0007. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
2
Eigenvector centrality defines hierarchy and predicts graduation in therapeutic community units.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261405. eCollection 2021.
3
Network Integration within a Prison-Based Therapeutic Community.
Soc Networks. 2021 Jan;64:16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
4
Building the community: Endogenous network formation, homophily and prosocial sorting among therapeutic community residents.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Feb 1;207:107773. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107773. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
5
Evaluating peer-influence processes in a prison-based therapeutic community: a dynamic network approach.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Oct 1;203:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

2
An Enhanced Understanding of Therapeutic Communities Worldwide.
Rev Adiccion Cienc. 2011;1(4). Epub 2015 Oct 24.
3
Predictors and treatment outcomes of perceived ward atmosphere among therapeutic community residents.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 May-Jun;46(5):567-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
4
Human cooperation.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):413-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
5
I dare you to punish me-vendettas in games of cooperation.
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045093. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
6
How therapeutic communities work: specific factors related to positive outcome.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;59(7):636-45. doi: 10.1177/0020764012450992. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
8
Do dimensions of therapeutic community treatment predict retention and outcomes?
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Oct;35(3):223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
9
Five rules for the evolution of cooperation.
Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1133755.
10
Evolution of indirect reciprocity.
Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1291-8. doi: 10.1038/nature04131.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验