Suppr超能文献

在三个治疗社区中,对接受纠正和肯定的短期亲社会行为反应

Short-Run Prosocial Behavior in Response to Receiving Corrections and Affirmations in Three Therapeutic Communities.

作者信息

Warren Keith L, Doogan Nathan, De Leon George, Phillips Gary S, Moody James, Hodge Ashleigh

机构信息

The Ohio State University College of Social Work.

出版信息

J Offender Rehabil. 2013 Jan 1;52(4):270-286. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2013.782776.

Abstract

Therapeutic communities (TC s) have a strong record of maintaining a high quality social climate on prison units. One possible reason for this is the system of mutual monitoring among TC residents, based on the assumption that peer affirmation of behavior in accord with TC norms and peer correction of behavior contrary to TC norms will lead to increased resident prosocial behavior. Laboratory experiments have demonstrated that such peer monitoring can lead to cooperation, but there has been no quantitative test of this hypothesis in an actual TC. In this article we test this assumption by using the affirmations that residents of three different TCs send as a measure of prosocial behavior following the reception of peer affirmations and corrections. At all three facilities residents send more affirmations following the reception of both affirmations and corrections, with this relationship being stronger and longer lasting after receiving affirmations. No other variable consistently predicts the number of affirmations that residents send to peers. These findings imply that mutual monitoring among TC residents can lead to increased levels of prosocial behavior within the facility, and that prosocial behavior in response to peer affirmations plays a key role.

摘要

治疗性社区(TCs)在维持监狱单元高质量社会氛围方面有着出色的记录。造成这种情况的一个可能原因是TC居民之间的相互监督系统,其基于这样一种假设,即同伴对符合TC规范行为的肯定以及对违反TC规范行为的纠正将导致居民亲社会行为的增加。实验室实验表明,这种同伴监督可以促进合作,但在实际的治疗性社区中尚未对这一假设进行定量测试。在本文中,我们通过使用三个不同治疗性社区的居民在收到同伴的肯定和纠正后所发出的肯定作为亲社会行为的一种衡量方式,来检验这一假设。在所有三个设施中,居民在收到肯定和纠正后都会发出更多的肯定,并且在收到肯定后这种关系会更强且持续时间更长。没有其他变量能持续预测居民向同伴发出肯定的数量。这些发现表明,治疗性社区居民之间的相互监督可以导致设施内亲社会行为水平的提高,并且对同伴肯定做出回应的亲社会行为起着关键作用。

相似文献

1
Short-Run Prosocial Behavior in Response to Receiving Corrections and Affirmations in Three Therapeutic Communities.
J Offender Rehabil. 2013 Jan 1;52(4):270-286. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2013.782776.
3
Saving My Life: Dynamics of Peer and Staff Corrections Among Therapeutic Community Residents.
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Sep 19;52(11):1429-1438. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1284236. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
Difference in Response to Feedback and Gender in Three Therapeutic Community Units.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 30;12:690713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.690713. eCollection 2021.
5
Resident interactions when affirming and correcting peers in a therapeutic community for women.
Ther Communities. 2021 Dec 2;42(4):137-148. doi: 10.1108/tc-03-2021-0007. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
6
Building the community: Endogenous network formation, homophily and prosocial sorting among therapeutic community residents.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Feb 1;207:107773. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107773. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
8
Eigenvector centrality defines hierarchy and predicts graduation in therapeutic community units.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261405. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The development and psychometric properties of the Prison Fellowship-Well-being Index (PF WBI).
Int J Prison Health (2024). 2025 Mar 19;21(1):55-74. doi: 10.1108/IJOPH-03-2024-0009.
2
Court-ordered forensic psychiatry treatment in prison: determinants of outcome and risk mitigation.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 3;15:1436962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436962. eCollection 2024.
3
Difference in Response to Feedback and Gender in Three Therapeutic Community Units.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 30;12:690713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.690713. eCollection 2021.
4
Network Integration within a Prison-Based Therapeutic Community.
Soc Networks. 2021 Jan;64:16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
5
Building the community: Endogenous network formation, homophily and prosocial sorting among therapeutic community residents.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Feb 1;207:107773. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107773. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
Semantic Networks, Schema Change, and Reincarceration Outcomes of Therapeutic Community Graduates.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Nov;70:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Verbal feedback in therapeutic communities: pull-ups and reciprocated pull-ups as predictors of graduation.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Apr;44(4):361-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
2
Do dimensions of therapeutic community treatment predict retention and outcomes?
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Oct;35(3):223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
3
Five rules for the evolution of cooperation.
Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1133755.
4
THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?
Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58(5):295-300. doi: 10.1177/003591576505800503.
5
Treatment process in prison therapeutic communities: motivation, participation, and outcome.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2001 Nov;27(4):633-50. doi: 10.1081/ada-100107660.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验