• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同干针技术治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的比较。

Comparision of two different dry-needling techniques in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome.

作者信息

Taşoğlu Özlem, Şahin Onat Şule, Bölük Hüma, Taşoğlu İrfan, Özgirgin Neşe

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara Physcial Medicine and Rehabiliation Training and Research Hospital, Ankara,

出版信息

Agri. 2017 Jan;29(1):9-16. doi: 10.5505/agri.2016.38991.

DOI:10.5505/agri.2016.38991
PMID:28467572
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of two different dry needling (DN) techniques (deep dry needling & peppering) in myofascial pain syndrome (MPS).

METHODS

Seventy-two patients, who were diagnosed as MPS at our outpatient clinic were randomly assigned into two groups as deep dry needling (DDN) and peppering. All patients were evaluated four times as: before the treatment and 1-5-12 weeks after the completion of treatment protocol. In each evaluation, Visual analogue scale (VAS), Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale (NEADLS), Beck depression inventory (BDI) scores were recorded. Additionally, all patients were evaluated for the pain felt during the procedure and side effect profile.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients from DDN group and twenty-eight patients from peppering group accomplished the follow-up period. Both DDN and peppering seem to be effective for relieving pain and depressive symptoms and improving functionality compared to baseline when evaluated on the 1st, 5th and 12th weeks. On the other hand the intergroup analyses showed no significant differences between DDN and peppering groups. The only significant difference between the groups is the lesser pain felt during the procedure in the DDN group.

CONCLUSION

Both DDN and peppering are effective in MPS and the effects last up to 12 weeks. Also the adverse event profiles of the two techniques are similar. On the other hand, DDN is a painless procedure.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同的干针疗法(深部干针疗法和散刺法)治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)的疗效。

方法

将我院门诊诊断为MPS的72例患者随机分为深部干针疗法(DDN)组和散刺法组。所有患者在治疗前、治疗方案完成后的1周、5周和12周进行4次评估。每次评估时,记录视觉模拟量表(VAS)、诺丁汉日常生活活动扩展量表(NEADLS)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)得分。此外,对所有患者进行操作过程中的疼痛感受和副作用情况评估。

结果

DDN组26例患者和散刺法组28例患者完成了随访。在第1周、第5周和第12周评估时,与基线相比,DDN和散刺法在缓解疼痛和抑郁症状以及改善功能方面似乎都有效。另一方面,组间分析显示DDN组和散刺法组之间无显著差异。两组之间唯一的显著差异是DDN组在操作过程中疼痛较轻。

结论

DDN和散刺法治疗MPS均有效,且效果可持续12周。此外,两种技术的不良事件情况相似。另一方面,DDN是一种无痛操作。

相似文献

1
Comparision of two different dry-needling techniques in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome.两种不同干针技术治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的比较。
Agri. 2017 Jan;29(1):9-16. doi: 10.5505/agri.2016.38991.
2
Deep dry needling of trigger points located in the lateral pterygoid muscle: Efficacy and safety of treatment for management of myofascial pain and temporomandibular dysfunction.翼外肌激痛点的深部干针疗法:治疗肌筋膜疼痛和颞下颌功能障碍的疗效及安全性
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 May 1;20(3):e326-33. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20384.
3
The effect of dry needling in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.干针疗法治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的效果:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;32(3):309-15. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2112-3. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
4
Randomized, double-blind study comparing percutaneous electrolysis and dry needling for the management of temporomandibular myofascial pain.比较经皮电解与干针疗法治疗颞下颌肌筋膜疼痛的随机双盲研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018 Jul 1;23(4):e454-e462. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22488.
5
Effectiveness of Different Deep Dry Needling Dosages in the Treatment of Patients With Cervical Myofascial Pain: A Pilot RCT.不同深度干针剂量治疗颈肌筋膜疼痛患者的有效性:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;96(10):726-733. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000733.
6
Comparison of miniscalpel-needle release, acupuncture needling, and stretching exercise to trigger point in myofascial pain syndrome.肌筋膜疼痛综合征中小针刀松解、针刺与伸展运动治疗扳机点的比较。
Clin J Pain. 2010 Mar-Apr;26(3):251-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b8cdc8.
7
Comparison of lidocaine injection, botulinum toxin injection, and dry needling to trigger points in myofascial pain syndrome.利多卡因注射、肉毒杆菌毒素注射与肌筋膜疼痛综合征触发点干针疗法的比较。
Rheumatol Int. 2005 Oct;25(8):604-11. doi: 10.1007/s00296-004-0485-6. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
8
Postneedling Soreness and Tenderness After Different Dosages of Dry Needling of an Active Myofascial Trigger Point in Patients With Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.颈部疼痛患者不同剂量干针疗法针刺活跃肌筋膜触发点后的针后酸痛和压痛:一项随机对照试验
PM R. 2018 Dec;10(12):1311-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
Comparison of the Efficacy of Dry Needling and High-Power Pain Threshold Ultrasound Therapy with Clinical Status and Sonoelastography in Myofascial Pain Syndrome.肌筋膜疼痛综合征中干针疗法与高功率疼痛阈值超声疗法的疗效与临床状况及超声弹性成像的比较
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;95(10):e149-58. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000600.
10
Referred Pain Patterns of the Infraspinatus Muscle Elicited by Deep Dry Needling and Manual Palpation.深部干针疗法和手法触诊引发的冈下肌牵涉痛模式
J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Nov;23(11):890-896. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0306. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dry Needling for Tension-Type Headache: A Scoping Review on Intervention Procedures, Muscle Targets, and Outcomes.干针疗法治疗紧张型头痛:关于干预程序、肌肉靶点和结果的范围综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 28;14(15):5320. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155320.
2
Lack of standardization in dry needling dosage and adverse event documentation limits outcome and safety reports: a scoping review of randomized clinical trials.干针剂量和不良事件记录缺乏标准化限制了结局和安全性报告:随机临床试验的范围综述。
J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Apr;31(2):72-83. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2077516. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a randomised controlled trial.
比较两种用于足跟足底疼痛的干针疗法:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e038033. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038033.
4
Dry needling for spine related disorders: a scoping review.干针治疗脊柱相关疾病:范围综述。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 May 11;28(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00310-z.
5
New perspectives on dry needling following a medical model: are we screening our patients sufficiently?医学模式下干针疗法的新视角:我们对患者的筛查是否足够?
J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Jul;27(3):172-179. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1567011. Epub 2019 Jan 19.