Wallen Gwenyth R, Saygbe Johnetta N, Brooks Alyssa Todaro, McClurkin Michael, Thomas Samantha, Powell-Wiley Tiffany M
Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Health Serv Insights. 2017 Apr 21;10:1178632917701123. doi: 10.1177/1178632917701123. eCollection 2017.
Establishing the validity of health behavior surveys used in community-based participatory research (CBPR) in diverse populations is often overlooked. A novel, group-based cognitive interviewing method was used to obtain qualitative data for tailoring a survey instrument designed to identify barriers to improved cardiovascular health in at-risk populations in Washington, DC. A focus group-based cognitive interview was conducted to assess item comprehension, recall, and interpretation and to establish the initial content validity of the survey. Thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts yielded 5 main themes for which participants (n = 8) suggested survey modifications, including survey item improvements, suggestions for additional items, community-specific issues, changes in the skip logic of the survey items, and the identification of typographical errors. Population-specific modifications were made, including the development of more culturally appropriate questions relevant to the community. Group-based cognitive interviewing provided an efficient and effective method for piloting a cardiovascular health survey instrument using CBPR.
在基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)中,用于不同人群的健康行为调查的有效性往往被忽视。一种新颖的、基于小组的认知访谈方法被用于获取定性数据,以定制一份旨在识别华盛顿特区高危人群改善心血管健康的障碍的调查工具。进行了一次基于焦点小组的认知访谈,以评估项目理解、回忆和解释,并建立该调查的初始内容效度。逐字记录的主题分析产生了5个主要主题,参与者(n = 8)针对这些主题提出了调查修改建议,包括调查项目改进、额外项目建议、社区特定问题、调查项目跳过逻辑的变化以及排版错误的识别。进行了针对特定人群的修改,包括制定与该社区更具文化适应性的问题。基于小组的认知访谈为使用CBPR试点心血管健康调查工具提供了一种高效且有效的方法。