• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论研究中的社区参与度测量。

On measuring community participation in research.

机构信息

The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2013 Jun;40(3):346-54. doi: 10.1177/1090198112459050. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1177/1090198112459050
PMID:23041704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3665736/
Abstract

Active participation of community partners in research aspects of community-academic partnered projects is often assumed to have a positive impact on the outcomes of such projects. The value of community engagement in research, however, cannot be empirically determined without good measures of the level of community participation in research activities. Based on our recent evaluation of community-academic partnered projects centered around behavioral health issues, this article uses semistructured interview and survey data to outline two complementary approaches to measuring the level of community participation in research-a "three-model" approach that differentiates between the levels of community participation and a Community Engagement in Research Index (CERI) that offers a multidimensional view of community engagement in the research process. The primary goal of this article is to present and compare these approaches, discuss their strengths and limitations, summarize the lessons learned, and offer directions for future research. We find that whereas the three-model approach is a simple measure of the perception of community participation in research activities, CERI allows for a more nuanced understanding by capturing multiple aspects of such participation. Although additional research is needed to validate these measures, our study makes a significant contribution by illustrating the complexity of measuring community participation in research and the lack of reliability in simple scores offered by the three-model approach.

摘要

社区合作伙伴积极参与社区-学术合作项目的研究方面,通常被认为对这类项目的成果具有积极影响。然而,如果没有衡量社区参与研究活动水平的良好措施,就无法从经验上确定社区参与研究的价值。基于我们最近对围绕行为健康问题的社区-学术合作项目的评估,本文使用半结构化访谈和调查数据,概述了衡量社区参与研究水平的两种互补方法——一种“三模型”方法,用于区分社区参与的水平,以及社区参与研究指数(CERI),提供了研究过程中社区参与的多维视角。本文的主要目标是介绍和比较这些方法,讨论它们的优势和局限性,总结经验教训,并为未来的研究提供方向。我们发现,虽然三模型方法是衡量社区参与研究活动的感知的简单措施,但 CERI 通过捕捉参与的多个方面,允许更细致的理解。尽管需要进一步的研究来验证这些措施,但我们的研究通过说明衡量社区参与研究的复杂性以及三模型方法提供的简单分数缺乏可靠性,做出了重要贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f88b/3665736/83079920d4c9/nihms399349f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f88b/3665736/e7c926fb999e/nihms399349f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f88b/3665736/83079920d4c9/nihms399349f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f88b/3665736/e7c926fb999e/nihms399349f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f88b/3665736/83079920d4c9/nihms399349f2.jpg

相似文献

1
On measuring community participation in research.论研究中的社区参与度测量。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Jun;40(3):346-54. doi: 10.1177/1090198112459050. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
2
Community Partner Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, Facilitating Factors, and Lessons Learned from Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships in Detroit.社区合作伙伴对底特律基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的益处、挑战、促进因素及经验教训的看法
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):299-311. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0031.
3
Growing a Community-Academic Partnership: Lessons Learned in Forming a Qualitative Interview Team for the Community Partners in Care Study.培育社区-学术合作伙伴关系:在“社区伙伴参与照护研究”中组建定性访谈小组的经验教训。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):365-370. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.365. eCollection 2018.
4
Increasing minority research participation through collaboration with community outpatient clinics: the STEP-BD Community Partners Experience.通过与社区门诊合作增加少数民族参与研究:STEP-BD 社区合作伙伴经验。
Clin Trials. 2009 Aug;6(4):344-54. doi: 10.1177/1740774509338427. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
5
Exploring the Multidimensionality of Trust in Participatory Health Partnerships - A Network Approach.探索参与式健康伙伴关系中信任的多维性——网络方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 6;10:925402. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.925402. eCollection 2022.
6
Assessing process and outcomes: evaluating community-based participatory research.评估过程与结果:评价基于社区的参与性研究。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Summer;2(2):85-6, 87-97. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0020.
7
Establishing a Framework for Sustainable Community Action Research.建立可持续社区行动研究框架。
Ethn Dis. 2022 Oct 20;32(4):333-340. doi: 10.18865/ed.32.4.333. eCollection 2022 Fall.
8
Lessons learned in measuring patient engagement in a Canada-wide childhood disability network.在加拿大全国性儿童残疾网络中衡量患者参与度所汲取的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 7;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00551-9.
9
Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study.患者和研究人员对初级保健医疗研究中患者参与的体验:一项参与式定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2365-2376. doi: 10.1111/hex.13542. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
10
Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model.参与式健康研究的影响:对基于社区的参与式研究概念模型的检验。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 24;2018:7281405. doi: 10.1155/2018/7281405. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement Methods in Brain Tumor Genomic Research: Multimethod Comparative Study.脑肿瘤基因组研究中的参与方法:多方法比较研究
J Particip Med. 2025 Aug 21;17:e68852. doi: 10.2196/68852.
2
Increasing community members' engagement in cancer research: the making research CLEAR program.提高社区成员对癌症研究的参与度:“让研究清晰明了”项目
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00741-z.
3
Community-Engaged Research in HIV Implementation Science: Characterizing Academic and Community Partnerships in the "Ending the HIV Epidemic" Supplement Awards.

本文引用的文献

1
An Exploration of the Effect of Community Engagement in Research on Perceived Outcomes of Partnered Mental Health Services Projects().社区参与研究对合作心理健康服务项目感知结果的影响探索()。 (注:括号部分原文内容不完整,翻译时保留原样)
Soc Ment Health. 2011 Nov 1;1(3):185-199. doi: 10.1177/2156869311431613.
2
Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA.整合研究与行动:对美国基于社区的参与性研究以解决环境与职业健康方面的健康差异的系统评价
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Aug;62(8):668-76. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.067645.
3
社区参与的艾滋病病毒实施科学研究:“终结艾滋病流行”补充奖中学术与社区伙伴关系的特征分析
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025 Apr 15;98(5S):e28-e37. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003633.
4
Can everyone hear me? Reflections on the use of global online workshops for promoting inclusive knowledge generation.大家都能听到我说话吗?关于利用全球在线研讨会促进包容性知识生成的思考。
Qual Res. 2023 Apr;23(2):195-216. doi: 10.1177/14687941211019585. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
Developing relevant assessments of community-engaged research partnerships: A community-based participatory approach to evaluating clinical and health research study teams.制定社区参与研究伙伴关系的相关评估:一种基于社区参与的方法来评估临床和健康研究团队。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 11;7(1):e123. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.544. eCollection 2023.
6
Community Research Fellows Training Program: Evaluation of a COVID-19-Precipitated Virtual Adaptation.社区研究学者培训计划:对新冠疫情引发的虚拟适应的评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 13;20(4):3254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043254.
7
Construct validation of the Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST).研究参与度调查工具(REST)的结构效度验证。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 16;8(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00360-y.
8
Co-production of the quality of patient-centered outcomes research partnerships instrument for people with mental health conditions.以患者为中心的心理健康状况患者结局研究伙伴关系工具质量的联合生产。
Patient Exp J. 2021;8(1):148-156. doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1533.
9
Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool.研究参与度调查工具简明版的开发与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 23;18(19):10020. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910020.
10
Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada.我们是否在践行参与式原住民健康研究的承诺?加拿大大西洋地区文献的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 27;16(7):e0255265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255265. eCollection 2021.
Promoting environmental justice through community-based participatory research: the role of community and partnership capacity.
通过基于社区的参与性研究促进环境正义:社区与伙伴关系能力的作用。
Health Educ Behav. 2008 Feb;35(1):119-37. doi: 10.1177/1090198106287692. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
4
Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities.运用基于社区的参与性研究来解决健康差异问题。
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jul;7(3):312-23. doi: 10.1177/1524839906289376. Epub 2006 Jun 7.
5
Community-based participatory research: lessons learned from the Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research.基于社区的参与性研究:从儿童环境卫生与疾病预防研究中心吸取的经验教训。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Oct;113(10):1463-71. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7675.
6
Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.基于社区的参与性研究:评估证据
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004 Aug(99):1-8.
7
Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research.基于社区的参与性研究:促进健康研究中伙伴关系方法的政策建议。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2001;14(2):182-97. doi: 10.1080/13576280110051055.
8
Implicit attitude measures: consistency, stability, and convergent validity.内隐态度测量:一致性、稳定性和聚合效度。
Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):163-70. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00328.
9
Principles of practice for academic/practice/community research partnerships.学术/实践/社区研究伙伴关系的实践原则。
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Apr;16(3 Suppl):86-93. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00149-4.