• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

八种根管封闭剂的细胞毒性比较评估

Comparative cytotoxicity evaluation of eight root canal sealers.

作者信息

Poggio Claudio, Riva Paolo, Chiesa Marco, Colombo Marco, Pietrocola Giampiero

机构信息

Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences - Section of Dentistry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Departement of Molecular Medicine, Unit of Biochemistry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Apr 1;9(4):e574-e578. doi: 10.4317/jced.53724. eCollection 2017 Apr.

DOI:10.4317/jced.53724
PMID:28469826
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5410681/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the cytotoxic effects of eight root canal sealers (BioRoot RCS, TotalFill BC Sealer, MTA Fillapex, Sealapex, AH Plus, EasySeal, Pulp Canal Sealer, N2) on immortalized human gingival fibroblasts over a period of 24, 48 and 72 hours.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Immortalized human gingival fibroblast-1 HGF-1 (ATCC CRL-2014) were incubated. Root canal sealers were then placed into sterile, cylindrical Teflon moulds. The extraction was made eluting the sealers in cell culture medium. Cells (1 × 104) were seeded in each well of a 96-well plate and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Cultures were then exposed to 100 μL of the extracts medium. The percentage of viable cells in each well was calculated relative to control cells set to 100%.

RESULTS

BioRoot RCS and TotalFill BC Sealer extracted for 24h showed no cytotoxic effect, while it was mild by using 48 and 72 h extracts. No cytotoxic effect was measured by using AH Plus medium eluted for 24 h, while it was moderate after 48 h and severe after 72 h. Pulp Canal Sealer, Sealapex and N2 showed moderately cytotoxic activity for all the extraction times. EasySeal and MTA Fillapex remained severely or borderline mildly cytotoxic for all the extraction times.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study only BioRoot RCS, TotalFill BC Sealer and AH Plus showed no cytotoxic effects at least in the first 24h. All the other sealers revealed moderately or severely cytotoxic activity during all the extraction times. Cytotoxicity, gingival fibroblast, MTT test, root canal sealer.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估和比较八种根管封闭剂(BioRoot RCS、TotalFill BC封闭剂、MTA Fillapex、Sealapex、AH Plus、EasySeal、牙髓根管封闭剂、N2)在24、48和72小时内对永生化人牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞毒性作用。

材料与方法

培养永生化人牙龈成纤维细胞-1 HGF-1(ATCC CRL-2014)。然后将根管封闭剂放入无菌圆柱形聚四氟乙烯模具中。通过在细胞培养基中洗脱封闭剂进行提取。将细胞(1×10⁴)接种到96孔板的每个孔中,并在37°C下孵育24小时。然后将培养物暴露于100μL提取培养基中。计算每个孔中活细胞的百分比相对于设定为100%的对照细胞的比例。

结果

提取24小时的BioRoot RCS和TotalFill BC封闭剂未显示细胞毒性作用,而使用48小时和72小时提取物时细胞毒性作用较轻。使用洗脱24小时的AH Plus培养基未检测到细胞毒性作用,而48小时后为中度,72小时后为重度。牙髓根管封闭剂、Sealapex和N2在所有提取时间均显示出中度细胞毒性活性。EasySeal和MTA Fillapex在所有提取时间均保持重度或临界轻度细胞毒性。

结论

在本研究中,仅BioRoot RCS、TotalFill BC封闭剂和AH Plus至少在最初24小时内未显示细胞毒性作用。所有其他封闭剂在所有提取时间均显示出中度或重度细胞毒性活性。细胞毒性、牙龈成纤维细胞、MTT试验、根管封闭剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4e/5410681/f0d1f0423818/jced-9-e574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4e/5410681/f0d1f0423818/jced-9-e574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4e/5410681/f0d1f0423818/jced-9-e574-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative cytotoxicity evaluation of eight root canal sealers.八种根管封闭剂的细胞毒性比较评估
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Apr 1;9(4):e574-e578. doi: 10.4317/jced.53724. eCollection 2017 Apr.
2
Biological and physico-chemical properties of new root canal sealers.新型根管封闭剂的生物学和物理化学性质
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Feb 1;10(2):e120-e126. doi: 10.4317/jced.54548. eCollection 2018 Feb.
3
Antibacterial activity of different root canal sealers against .不同根管封闭剂对……的抗菌活性
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jun 1;9(6):e743-e748. doi: 10.4317/jced.53753. eCollection 2017 Jun.
4
Biocompatibility and Mineralization Activity of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer in Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.与传统树脂基封闭剂相比,三种硅酸钙基根管封闭剂在人牙髓干细胞中的生物相容性和矿化活性
Materials (Basel). 2019 Aug 5;12(15):2482. doi: 10.3390/ma12152482.
5
Analysis of the physicochemical properties, cytotoxicity and volumetric changes of AH Plus, MTA Fillapex and TotalFill BC Sealer.AH Plus、MTA Fillapex和TotalFill BC封闭剂的物理化学性质、细胞毒性及体积变化分析
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Nov 1;12(11):e1058-e1065. doi: 10.4317/jced.57527. eCollection 2020 Nov.
6
Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的细胞相容性及其对间充质牙干细胞生物学反应的影响评估。
Int Endod J. 2017 Jan;50(1):67-76. doi: 10.1111/iej.12596. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
7
Cytotoxicity Comparison of MTA Fillapex, AH-26 and Apatite Root Canal Sealer at Different Setting Times.MTA Fillapex、AH-26和磷灰石根管封闭剂在不同凝固时间的细胞毒性比较
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):162-167. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.32.
8
Evaluation of the biocompatibility of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells ex vivo.评价根管封闭剂对人牙周膜细胞的体外生物相容性。
Odontology. 2019 Jan;107(1):54-63. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0380-3. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
Short-Term Antibacterial Efficacy of Three Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers Against Biofilms.三种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂对生物膜的短期抗菌效果
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Mar;54(1):3-9. doi: 10.15644/asc54/1/1.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Root Canal Sealers on Cultured Human Periodontal Fibroblasts: In vitro Study.根管封闭剂对培养的人牙周膜成纤维细胞细胞毒性的比较评价:体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jul 1;19(7):847-852.

引用本文的文献

1
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity evaluation of AH Plus, Well-Root ST, and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer.AH Plus、Well-Root ST和AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 31;25(1):867. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06231-8.
2
Comparative analysis of the inflammatory response of human gingival fibroblasts to NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers: an in vitro study.人牙龈成纤维细胞对NeoSEALER Flo和CeraSeal生物陶瓷封闭剂炎症反应的比较分析:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05692-1.
3
Evaluation of the antibacterial and cytotoxic properties of TotalFill and NeoSEALER flo bioceramic sealers.

本文引用的文献

1
Biocompatibility of three new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers on human periodontal ligament stem cells.三种新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞的生物相容性。
Int Endod J. 2017 Sep;50(9):875-884. doi: 10.1111/iej.12703. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
2
Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在三维细胞培养模型中的细胞相容性
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1531-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1918-9. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
3
Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells.
TotalFill和NeoSEALER流动型生物陶瓷封闭剂的抗菌和细胞毒性特性评估
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 May;27(5):491-497. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_103_24. Epub 2024 May 10.
4
Analysis of the cytotoxicity and bioactivity of CeraSeal, BioRoot™ and AH Plus sealers in pre-osteoblast lineage cells.分析 CeraSeal、BioRoot™ 和 AH Plus 根管封闭剂对前成骨细胞系细胞的细胞毒性和生物活性。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04021-2.
5
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer.与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54726-1.
6
Remineralization ability of different root canal sealers.不同根管封闭剂的再矿化能力
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Dec;35(8):1014-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
7
Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers.Bio C封闭剂与多种根管封闭剂的细胞毒性比较
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Feb 1;15(2):e110-e117. doi: 10.4317/jced.59868. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Influence of Commonly Used Endodontic Irrigants on the Setting Time and Metal Composition of Various Base Endodontic Sealers.常用根管冲洗剂对各种根管封闭剂凝固时间和金属成分的影响。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;14(1):27. doi: 10.3390/polym14010027.
9
Biocompatibility and bioactive potential of the NeoMTA Plus endodontic bioceramic-based sealer.基于NeoMTA Plus牙髓生物陶瓷的封闭剂的生物相容性和生物活性潜力。
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Dec 17;46(1):e4. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e4. eCollection 2021 Feb.
10
Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration.硅酸钙基封闭剂的呈现形式会影响牙本质封闭吗?一项关于小管渗透的体外共聚焦激光研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 31;14(3):659. doi: 10.3390/ma14030659.
硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的细胞相容性及其对间充质牙干细胞生物学反应的影响评估。
Int Endod J. 2017 Jan;50(1):67-76. doi: 10.1111/iej.12596. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic endodontic sealer.一种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性、遗传毒性及抗菌效果
Int Endod J. 2016 Sep;49(9):858-864. doi: 10.1111/iej.12523. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Bioactivity of a Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Cement (BioRoot RCS): Interactions with Human Periodontal Ligament Cells In Vitro.一种硅酸钙基根管充填粘固剂(BioRoot RCS)的生物活性:体外与人牙周膜细胞的相互作用
J Endod. 2015 Sep;41(9):1469-73. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 19.
6
In vitro cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-containing endodontic sealers.含硅酸钙的根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性
J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
7
In vitro cytotoxicity of white MTA, MTA Fillapex® and Portland cement on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.白色MTA、MTA Fillapex®和波特兰水泥对人牙周膜成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性
Braz Dent J. 2013;24(2):111-6. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201302115.
8
Long-term cytotoxic effects of contemporary root canal sealers.当代根管封闭剂的长期细胞毒性作用。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;21(1):43-7. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757201302304.
9
Evaluation of cytotoxicity and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer MTA Fillapex.评估基于硅酸钙的根管封闭剂 MTA Fillapex 的细胞毒性和理化性能。
J Endod. 2013 Feb;39(2):274-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.030. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
10
Cytotoxicity evaluation of two root canal sealers and a commercial calcium hydroxide paste on THP1 cell line by Trypan Blue assay.采用台盼蓝法评估两种根管封闭剂和一种商用氢氧化钙糊剂对 THP1 细胞系的细胞毒性。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Sep-Oct;17(5):457-61. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000500020.