McKirdy A, Imbuldeniya A M
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, West Middlesex University Hospital, Twickenham Road, Isleworth TW7 6AF UK
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, West Middlesex University Hospital, Twickenham Road, Isleworth TW7 6AF UK.
Bone Joint Res. 2017 May;6(5):259-269. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.65.BJR-2017-0330.R1.
To assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a virtual fracture clinic (VFC) model, and supplement the literature regarding this service as recommended by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA).
This was a retrospective study including all patients (17 116) referred to fracture clinics in a London District General Hospital from May 2013 to April 2016, using hospital-level data. We used interrupted time series analysis with segmented regression, and direct before-and-after comparison, to study the impact of VFCs introduced in December 2014 on six clinical parameters and on local Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) spend. Student's tests were used for direct comparison, whilst segmented regression was employed for projection analysis.
There were statistically significant reductions in numbers of new patients seen face-to-face (140.4, sd 39.6 461.6, sd 61.63, p < 0.0001), days to first orthopaedic review (5.2, sd 0.66 10.9, sd 1.5, p < 0.0001), discharges (33.5, sd 3.66 129.2, sd 7.36, p < 0.0001) and non-attendees (14.82, sd 1.48 60.47, sd 2.68, p < 0.0001), in addition to a statistically significant increase in number of patients seen within 72-hours (46.4% 3873 of 8345 5.1% 447 of 8771, p < 0.0001). There was a non-significant increase in consultation time of 1 minute 9 seconds (14 minutes 53 seconds sd 106 seconds 13 minutes 44 seconds sd 128 seconds, p = 0.0878). VFC saved the local CCG £67 385.67 in the first year and is set to save £129 885.67 annually thereafter.
We have shown VFCs are clinically and cost-effective, with improvement across several clinical performance parameters and substantial financial savings for CCGs. To our knowledge this is the largest study addressing clinical practice implications of VFCs in England, using robust methodology to adjust for pre-existing trends. Further studies are required to appreciate whether our results are reproducible with local variations in the VFC model and payment tariffs. A. McKirdy, A. M. Imbuldeniya. The clinical and cost effectiveness of a virtual fracture clinic service: An interrupted time series analysis and before-and-after comparison. 2017;6:-269. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.65.BJR-2017-0330.R1.
评估虚拟骨折诊所(VFC)模式的临床效果和成本效益,并按照英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)和英国骨科协会(BOA)的建议补充有关该服务的文献资料。
这是一项回顾性研究,利用医院层面的数据,纳入了2013年5月至2016年4月间转诊至伦敦一家地区综合医院骨折诊所的所有患者(17116例)。我们采用带有分段回归的中断时间序列分析以及直接前后比较,来研究2014年12月引入的VFC对六个临床参数和当地临床委托小组(CCG)支出的影响。采用学生检验进行直接比较,而分段回归用于预测分析。
面对面就诊的新患者数量(140.4,标准差39.6对461.6,标准差61.63,p<0.0001)、首次骨科复诊天数(5.2,标准差0.66对10.9,标准差1.5,p<0.0001)、出院人数(33.5,标准差3.66对129.2,标准差7.36,p<0.0001)和未就诊人数(14.82,标准差1.48对60.47,标准差2.68,p<0.0001)均有统计学显著减少,此外,72小时内就诊的患者数量有统计学显著增加(46.4%,8345例中的3873例对5.1%,8771例中的447例,p<0.0001)。会诊时间增加了1分9秒,但无统计学显著性(14分53秒,标准差106秒对13分44秒,标准差128秒,p = 0.0878)。VFC在第一年为当地CCG节省了67385.67英镑,此后预计每年节省129885.67英镑。
我们已证明VFC在临床和成本效益方面表现良好,多个临床绩效参数得到改善,为CCG节省了大量资金。据我们所知,这是英国针对VFC对临床实践影响的最大规模研究,采用了稳健的方法来调整既往趋势。需要进一步研究以了解我们的结果在VFC模式和支付费率存在地区差异的情况下是否具有可重复性。A. 麦柯迪,A.M. 因布尔迪尼亚。虚拟骨折诊所服务的临床和成本效益:中断时间序列分析和前后比较。2017;6:-269。DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.65.BJR-2017-0330.R1。