Morris Gareth, Leite Marco, Kullmann Dimitri M, Pavlov Ivan, Schorge Stephanie, Lignani Gabriele
Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG London, United Kingdom.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG London, United Kingdom
J Neurosci. 2017 May 31;37(22):5484-5495. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3697-16.2017. Epub 2017 May 4.
A major challenge in experimental epilepsy research is to reconcile the effects of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) on individual neurons with their network-level actions. Highlighting this difficulty, it is unclear why carbamazepine (CBZ), a frontline AED with a known molecular mechanism, has been reported to increase epileptiform activity in several clinical and experimental studies. We confirmed in an mouse model (in both sexes) that the frequency of interictal bursts increased after CBZ perfusion. To address the underlying mechanisms, we developed a method, activity clamp, to distinguish the response of individual neurons from network-level actions of CBZ. We first recorded barrages of synaptic conductances from neurons during epileptiform activity and then replayed them in pharmacologically isolated neurons under control conditions and in the presence of CBZ. CBZ consistently decreased the reliability of the second action potential in each burst of activity. Conventional current-clamp recordings using excitatory ramp or square-step current injections failed to reveal this effect. Network modeling showed that a CBZ-induced decrease of neuron recruitment during epileptic bursts can lead to an increase in burst frequency at the network level by reducing the refractoriness of excitatory transmission. By combining activity clamp with computer simulations, the present study provides a potential explanation for the paradoxical effects of CBZ on epileptiform activity. The effects of anti-epileptic drugs on individual neurons are difficult to separate from their network-level actions. Although carbamazepine (CBZ) has a known anti-epileptic mechanism, paradoxically, it has also been reported to increase epileptiform activity in clinical and experimental studies. To investigate this paradox during realistic neuronal epileptiform activity, we developed a method, activity clamp, to distinguish the effects of CBZ on individual neurons from network-level actions. We demonstrate that CBZ consistently decreases the reliability of the second action potential in each burst of epileptiform activity. Network modeling shows that this effect on individual neuronal responses could explain the paradoxical effect of CBZ at the network level.
实验性癫痫研究中的一个主要挑战是协调抗癫痫药物(AEDs)对单个神经元的作用与其在网络水平上的作用。突出这一困难的是,尚不清楚卡马西平(CBZ),一种具有已知分子机制的一线AED,为何在多项临床和实验研究中被报道会增加癫痫样活动。我们在小鼠模型(雌雄均有)中证实,灌注CBZ后发作间期爆发的频率增加。为了探究其潜在机制,我们开发了一种方法,即活动钳制,以区分单个神经元的反应与CBZ在网络水平上的作用。我们首先在癫痫样活动期间记录神经元的突触电导阵发放,然后在对照条件下以及存在CBZ的情况下,在药理学隔离的神经元中重放这些电导阵发放。CBZ持续降低每次活动爆发中第二个动作电位的可靠性。使用兴奋性斜坡或方波电流注入的传统电流钳记录未能揭示这种效应。网络建模表明,CBZ诱导的癫痫发作期间神经元募集减少可通过降低兴奋性传递的不应期导致网络水平上爆发频率增加。通过将活动钳制与计算机模拟相结合,本研究为CBZ对癫痫样活动的矛盾效应提供了一种潜在解释。抗癫痫药物对单个神经元的作用难以与其在网络水平上的作用分开。尽管卡马西平(CBZ)具有已知的抗癫痫机制,但矛盾的是,在临床和实验研究中也有报道称它会增加癫痫样活动。为了在真实的神经元癫痫样活动中研究这一矛盾现象,我们开发了一种方法,即活动钳制,以区分CBZ对单个神经元的作用与网络水平上的作用。我们证明,CBZ持续降低癫痫样活动每次爆发中第二个动作电位的可靠性。网络建模表明,这种对单个神经元反应的影响可以解释CBZ在网络水平上的矛盾效应。