Flor Jaimie, Bellando Jayne, Lopez Maya, Shui Amy
Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Autism Res. 2017 Aug;10(8):1344-1352. doi: 10.1002/aur.1779. Epub 2017 May 5.
Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) may be characterized as "complex" (those with microcephaly and/or dysmorphology) or "essential" (those with neither of these two). Previous studies found subjects in the complex group exhibited lower IQ scores, poorer response to behavioral intervention, more seizures and more abnormal EEGs and brain MRIs compared to the essential group. The objective of this study was to determine if there are differences in complex versus essential subjects based on several developmental/psychological measures as well as certain medical comorbidities. This study utilized data from 1,347 individuals (2-17 years old) well-characterized subjects enrolled in Autism Treatment Network (ATN) Registry. Head circumference measurement and the Autism Dysmorphology Measure (ADM) were used by trained physicians to classify subjects as complex or essential. Significantly lower scores were seen for complex subjects in cognitive level, adaptive behavior and quality of life. Complex subjects showed significantly increased physician-documented GI symptoms and were on a higher number of medications. No significant differences in autism severity scores, behavioral ratings and parent-reported sleep problems were found. After adjusting for multiple comparisons made, adaptive scores remained significantly lower for the complex group, and the complex group used a significantly higher number of medications and had increased GI symptoms. Complex and essential autism subtypes may have distinct developmental and medical correlates and thus underlines the importance of looking for microcephaly and dysmorphology, when evaluating a child with autism. Determining this distinction in autism may have implications in prognosis, identifying medical co-morbidities, directing diagnostic evaluations and treatment interventions. Autism Res 2017, 10: 1344-1352. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童可分为“复杂型”(患有小头畸形和/或畸形)或“典型型”(两者均无)。先前的研究发现,与典型型组相比,复杂型组的受试者智商得分更低、对行为干预的反应更差、癫痫发作更多、脑电图和脑部核磁共振成像异常更多。本研究的目的是根据多项发育/心理指标以及某些合并症,确定复杂型与典型型受试者之间是否存在差异。本研究使用了来自自闭症治疗网络(ATN)登记处的1347名(2至17岁)特征明确的受试者的数据。训练有素的医生使用头围测量和自闭症畸形测量(ADM)将受试者分类为复杂型或典型型。复杂型受试者在认知水平、适应行为和生活质量方面的得分显著更低。复杂型受试者的医生记录的胃肠道症状显著增加,且服用的药物数量更多。在自闭症严重程度评分、行为评分和家长报告的睡眠问题方面未发现显著差异。在对多次比较进行调整后,复杂型组的适应得分仍然显著更低,且复杂型组使用的药物数量显著更多,胃肠道症状增加。复杂型和典型型自闭症亚型可能具有不同的发育和医学关联,因此强调了在评估自闭症儿童时寻找小头畸形和畸形的重要性。确定自闭症中的这种差异可能对预后、识别合并症、指导诊断评估和治疗干预具有影响。《自闭症研究》2017年,10: 1344 - 1352。© 2017国际自闭症研究协会,威利期刊公司