• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

离体肾结石的CT纹理分析可预测冲击波碎石术的碎石难易程度。

CT Texture Analysis of Ex Vivo Renal Stones Predicts Ease of Fragmentation with Shockwave Lithotripsy.

作者信息

Cui Helen W, Devlies Wout, Ravenscroft Samuel, Heers Hendrik, Freidin Andrew J, Cleveland Robin O, Ganeshan Balaji, Turney Benjamin W

机构信息

1 Oxford Stone Group, University of Oxford , Oxford, United Kingdom .

2 Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium .

出版信息

J Endourol. 2017 Jul;31(7):694-700. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0084. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0084
PMID:28474533
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the factors affecting success of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) would improve informed decision-making on the most appropriate treatment modality for an individual patient. Although stone size and skin-to-stone distance do correlate with fragmentation efficacy, it has been shown that stone composition and architecture, as reflected by structural heterogeneity on CT, are also important factors. This study aims to determine if CT texture analysis (CTTA), a novel, nondestructive, and objective tool that generates statistical metrics reflecting stone heterogeneity, could have utility in predicting likelihood of SWL success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven spontaneously passed, intact renal tract stones, were scanned ex vivo using standard CT KUB and micro-CT. The stones were then fragmented in vitro using a clinical lithotripter, after which, chemical composition analysis was performed. CTTA was used to generate a number of metrics that were correlated to the number of shocks needed to fragment the stone.

RESULTS

CTTA metrics reflected stone characteristics and composition, and predicted ease of SWL fragmentation. The strongest correlation with number of shocks required to fragment the stone was mean Hounsfield unit (HU) density (r = 0.806, p = 0.028) and a CTTA metric measuring the entropy of the pixel distribution of the stone image (r = 0.804, p = 0.039). Using multiple linear regression analysis, the best model showed that CTTA metrics of entropy and kurtosis could predict 92% of the outcome of number of shocks needed to fragment the stone. This was superior to using stone volume or density.

CONCLUSIONS

CTTA metrics entropy and kurtosis have been shown in this experimental ex vivo setting to strongly predict fragmentation by SWL. This warrants further investigation in a larger clinical study for the contribution of CT textural metrics as a measure of stone heterogeneity, along with other known clinical factors, to predict likelihood of SWL success.

摘要

引言

了解影响体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)成功的因素,将有助于就个体患者最合适的治疗方式做出明智的决策。虽然结石大小和皮肤至结石距离确实与碎石效果相关,但研究表明,CT上结构异质性所反映的结石成分和结构也是重要因素。本研究旨在确定CT纹理分析(CTTA)这一新型、无损且客观的工具,其能生成反映结石异质性的统计指标,是否有助于预测SWL成功的可能性。

材料与方法

对七颗自然排出的完整尿路结石进行体外扫描,采用标准CT KUB和微型CT。然后使用临床碎石机在体外将结石粉碎,之后进行化学成分分析。CTTA用于生成一些与粉碎结石所需冲击次数相关的指标。

结果

CTTA指标反映了结石特征和成分,并预测了SWL碎石的难易程度。与粉碎结石所需冲击次数相关性最强的是平均亨氏单位(HU)密度(r = 0.806,p = 0.028)以及测量结石图像像素分布熵的CTTA指标(r = 0.804,p = 0.039)。使用多元线性回归分析,最佳模型显示熵和峰度的CTTA指标可预测92%的结石粉碎所需冲击次数的结果。这优于使用结石体积或密度。

结论

在本体外实验环境中,已表明CTTA指标熵和峰度能有力地预测SWL碎石情况。这值得在更大规模的临床研究中进一步探究,以确定CT纹理指标作为衡量结石异质性的指标,与其他已知临床因素一起,对预测SWL成功可能性的贡献。

相似文献

1
CT Texture Analysis of Ex Vivo Renal Stones Predicts Ease of Fragmentation with Shockwave Lithotripsy.离体肾结石的CT纹理分析可预测冲击波碎石术的碎石难易程度。
J Endourol. 2017 Jul;31(7):694-700. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0084. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
2
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石:CT 纹理分析技术能否帮助预测疗效?
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.Hounsfield 单位在预测冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石结局中的作用:系统评价结果。
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Apr;24(4):173-185. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01145-w. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
5
The role of plain radiography in predicting renal stone fragmentation by shockwave lithotripsy in the era of noncontrast multidetector computed tomography.在非增强多排螺旋 CT 时代,普通 X 线摄影在预测冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石碎裂中的作用。
J Endourol. 2014 Jul;28(7):850-3. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0034. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
6
The utility of automated volume analysis of renal stones before and after shockwave lithotripsy treatment.冲击波碎石术前后肾结石自动体积分析的实用性。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Jun;49(3):219-226. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01212-8. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy based on CT texture analysis.基于 CT 纹理分析的体外冲击波碎石术的疗效。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14823. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14823. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
8
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.评估平均结石密度和皮肤至结石距离在预测肾和输尿管结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的重要性。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
9
External Validation and Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the Triple D Score to Predict Stone-Free Status After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后预测结石清除状态的三联D评分的可靠性和有效性的外部验证与评估
J Endourol. 2017 Feb;31(2):169-173. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0721. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up.肾结石特征比肾脏解剖结构更能预测体外冲击波碎石术的结果:一项前瞻性研究并结合 CT 随访的结果。
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):63-67. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0545. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical applications of AI in body imaging.人工智能在人体成像中的实际应用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05088-3.
2
Prediction of burden and management of renal calculi from whole kidney radiomics: a multicenter study.基于全肾影像组学预测结石负担并管理肾结石:一项多中心研究。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 May;46(5):2097-2106. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02865-0. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
3
Comparison of ultrasound-assisted and pure fluoroscopy-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.超声辅助与纯透视引导体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的比较。
BMC Urol. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00756-6.
4
Differentiating High-Grade Gliomas from Brain Metastases at Magnetic Resonance: The Role of Texture Analysis of the Peritumoral Zone.磁共振成像鉴别高级别胶质瘤与脑转移瘤:瘤周区域纹理分析的作用
Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 16;10(9):638. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10090638.
5
Radiomic Analysis of MRI Images is Instrumental to the Stratification of Ovarian Cysts.MRI图像的放射组学分析有助于卵巢囊肿的分层。
J Pers Med. 2020 Sep 14;10(3):127. doi: 10.3390/jpm10030127.
6
The utility of automated volume analysis of renal stones before and after shockwave lithotripsy treatment.冲击波碎石术前后肾结石自动体积分析的实用性。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Jun;49(3):219-226. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01212-8. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Predicting shockwave lithotripsy outcome for urolithiasis using clinical and stone computed tomography texture analysis variables.使用临床和结石 CT 纹理分析变量预测上尿路结石的体外冲击波碎石术疗效。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 11;9(1):14674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51026-x.
8
Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters for Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcome in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Cases.非对比 CT 参数对上尿路结石钬激光碎石术治疗结果的预测作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 2;2018:9253952. doi: 10.1155/2018/9253952. eCollection 2018.
9
Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.CT-Calculometry(CT-CM)的高级非对比计算机断层扫描后处理优于已建立的冲击波碎石术结果预测指标。
World J Urol. 2018 Dec;36(12):2073-2080. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2348-x. Epub 2018 May 29.