• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年急性髓系白血病患者一线治疗失败后使用去甲基化药物的结果:单机构经验。

Outcome of elderly patients after failure to hypomethylating agents given as frontline therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: Single institution experience.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic, Hospital Pharmacy Services, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Am J Hematol. 2017 Sep;92(9):866-871. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24780. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1002/ajh.24780
PMID:28474744
Abstract

Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy is challenging. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) can be effective in these patients but responses are usually short-lived. The majority of patients will either have stable disease or progress through therapy. We hereby describe the outcome of these patients at our institution after they fail HMAs. The data on 56 AML patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester were reviewed. Patients were considered for our study if they received HMA as frontline therapy for their AML. Out of 56 patients, 15 (27%) patients received azacitidine (AZA) and 41 (73%) received decitabine. Complete remission was found in 10 (18%), with overall response of 28% and median response duration of 10 months. Thirteen (81%) out of 16 responders relapsed. Therefore 53 patients were included in the primary or secondary failure analysis with a median overall survival (OS) of 2 months after the date of failure. Out of 53 patients, 12 (23%) received subsequent treatments. None of the 12 patients who got first salvage therapy achieved remission. Five out of the 12 patients received second salvage therapy, 2 (40%) of which achieved CR. Median OS for patients who received subsequent salvage therapies was better than those who did not receive any subsequent therapy after failing HMA (9.5 vs. 2 months, P = .0009). Outcome for patients who have primary or secondary failure is very poor. Our study provides important historical data for future novel therapies, which are sorely needed for these patients.

摘要

不适合强化化疗的老年急性髓系白血病 (AML) 患者的治疗结果颇具挑战性。低甲基化剂 (HMA) 对这些患者可能有效,但反应通常是短暂的。大多数患者的疾病要么稳定,要么在治疗过程中进展。在此,我们描述了这些患者在我们的机构中在 HMA 治疗失败后的结果。对 Mayo 诊所罗切斯特院区的 56 例 AML 患者的数据进行了回顾。如果患者接受 HMA 作为 AML 的一线治疗,则将其纳入我们的研究。在 56 例患者中,15 例(27%)接受阿扎胞苷 (AZA),41 例(73%)接受地西他滨。10 例(18%)患者达到完全缓解,总体缓解率为 28%,中位缓解持续时间为 10 个月。16 例缓解者中有 13 例(81%)复发。因此,在主要或次要治疗失败分析中,有 53 例患者在失败日期后中位总生存期 (OS) 为 2 个月。在 53 例患者中,有 12 例(23%)接受了后续治疗。首次挽救治疗的 12 例患者中无一例达到缓解。在这 12 例患者中有 5 例接受了第二次挽救治疗,其中 2 例(40%)达到完全缓解。接受后续挽救治疗的患者的中位 OS 优于 HMA 治疗失败后未接受任何后续治疗的患者(9.5 个月 vs. 2 个月,P = .0009)。HMA 治疗失败后的患者预后极差。我们的研究为未来急需的这些患者提供了重要的历史数据。

相似文献

1
Outcome of elderly patients after failure to hypomethylating agents given as frontline therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: Single institution experience.老年急性髓系白血病患者一线治疗失败后使用去甲基化药物的结果:单机构经验。
Am J Hematol. 2017 Sep;92(9):866-871. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24780. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
2
Therapeutic decision-making in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: conventional intensive chemotherapy versus hypomethylating agent therapy.老年急性髓系白血病患者的治疗决策:传统强化化疗与去甲基化药物治疗对比
Ann Hematol. 2017 Nov;96(11):1801-1809. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3104-9. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
3
Discontinuation of hypomethylating agent therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myelogenous leukemia in complete remission or partial response: retrospective analysis of survival after long-term follow-up.骨髓增生异常综合征或急性髓系白血病完全缓解或部分缓解患者停用去甲基化药物治疗:长期随访后生存情况的回顾性分析
Leuk Res. 2015 May;39(5):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
4
Efficacy of the hypomethylating agents as frontline, salvage, or consolidation therapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).低甲基化剂作为一线、挽救或巩固治疗成人急性髓系白血病(AML)的疗效。
Ann Hematol. 2014 Jan;93(1):47-55. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1940-9. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
5
Efficacy and toxicity of Decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): A multicenter real-world experience.地西他滨治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的疗效与毒性:一项多中心真实世界研究经验
Leuk Res. 2019 Jan;76:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Hypomethylating agents in relapsed and refractory AML: outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort.复发/难治性 AML 中去甲基化药物:大型国际患者队列中的结果及其预测因素。
Blood Adv. 2018 Apr 24;2(8):923-932. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016121.
7
Predictive factors for response and survival in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with hypomethylating agents: a real-life experience.低甲基化剂治疗老年急性髓系白血病患者的反应和生存的预测因素:真实世界的经验。
Ann Hematol. 2020 Oct;99(10):2405-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04217-w. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
8
Ten-day decitabine as initial therapy for newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy.十天的地西他滨作为新诊断的不适合强化化疗的急性髓性白血病患者的初始治疗。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2014 Jul;55(7):1533-7. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.856425. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
9
Hypomethylating agents combined with low-dose chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: a real-world clinical experience.低甲基化剂联合小剂量化疗治疗不适合强化化疗的老年急性髓系白血病患者:真实世界的临床经验。
J Chemother. 2023 Jul;35(4):322-329. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2022.2097433. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
10
Venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia refractory to hypomethylating agents-a multicenter historical prospective study.维奈克拉治疗对低甲基化剂耐药的急性髓系白血病患者:一项多中心历史前瞻性研究。
Ann Hematol. 2019 Aug;98(8):1927-1932. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03719-6. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
What's Next after Hypomethylating Agents Failure in Myeloid Neoplasms? A Rational Approach.骨髓肿瘤中去甲基化药物治疗失败后下一步该怎么做?一种合理的方法。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 12;15(8):2248. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082248.
2
Cardiac events in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents.接受维奈克拉联合去甲基化药物治疗的急性髓系白血病患者的心脏事件
Blood Adv. 2022 Sep 13;6(17):5227-5231. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007333.
3
Less intensive antileukemic therapies (monotherapy and/or combination) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia who are not candidates for intensive antileukemic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
不适合强化抗白血病治疗的老年急性髓系白血病患者的低强度抗白血病治疗(单药治疗和/或联合治疗):系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0263240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263240. eCollection 2022.
4
Abnormal expression and methylation of PRR34-AS1 are associated with adverse outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia.PRR34-AS1 的异常表达和甲基化与急性髓系白血病的不良预后相关。
Cancer Med. 2021 Aug;10(15):5283-5296. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4085. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
5
Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.复发/难治性急性髓系白血病的治疗
Hemasphere. 2021 Jun 1;5(6):e572. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000572. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Venetoclax-based chemotherapy in acute and chronic myeloid neoplasms: literature survey and practice points.基于 Venetoclax 的化疗在急性和慢性髓性肿瘤中的应用:文献综述和实践要点。
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Nov 23;10(11):122. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00388-x.
7
Outcomes of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia after frontline hypomethylating agent and venetoclax regimens.一线使用去甲基化药物和维奈克拉方案治疗后复发或难治性急性髓系白血病的疗效
Haematologica. 2021 Mar 1;106(3):894-898. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.252569.